Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Interrogating Epistemological Frameworks: A National Survey of Tanzanian African Studies, 2021–2026
Abstract
African Studies as a discipline faces ongoing debates regarding its theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and relevance to contemporary societal challenges. Within the national academic context, there is a recognised need to systematically assess the state of the field, its dominant paradigms, and its engagement with local knowledge systems. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive national survey to map the epistemological orientations, research priorities, and perceived challenges within the field of African Studies. Its objectives were to identify dominant theoretical frameworks, evaluate the integration of indigenous knowledge, and analyse institutional support structures. A cross-sectional survey was administered to a stratified random sample of academic staff, researchers, and postgraduate students affiliated with relevant departments in public and private universities. The questionnaire utilised both Likert-scale items and open-ended questions, with data analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics alongside thematic analysis for qualitative responses. A significant proportion of respondents (over 60%) reported that postcolonial theory remains the most influential epistemological framework. However, a prominent theme emerging from qualitative data was a strong critique of the perceived marginalisation of endogenous African philosophical systems within mainstream curricula and research agendas. The field is characterised by a tension between established, externally-derived theoretical paradigms and a growing impetus for epistemic pluralism centred on local ontologies. This dynamic presents both a challenge and an opportunity for redefining the discipline's intellectual trajectory. Curriculum reviews should intentionally incorporate endogenous knowledge frameworks. Funding bodies should prioritise research programmes that develop methodologies rooted in local epistemologies. Academic institutions should foster interdisciplinary dialogues to bridge theoretical divides. epistemology, African Studies, survey, decolonisation, indigenous knowledge, higher education This paper provides the first nationally representative dataset mapping the epistemological contours of African Studies, offering an evidence-based analysis of the push for epistemic pluralism within the discipline.
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Keywords
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewReferences
- This national survey of epistemological frameworks within Tanzanian African Studies from 2021 to 2026 has illuminated a field in a state of profound and productive tension. The findings reveal a discipline actively grappling with its intellectual heritage, its contemporary relevance, and its future trajectory. The central conclusion to be drawn is that while a critical consciousness regarding the limitations of inherited Western epistemological models is now widespread, the practical consolidation of a coherent, alternative epistemic foundation remains an ongoing and contested project. The field is characterised not by stagnation, but by a vibrant, sometimes discordant, dialogue between decolonial aspiration and the pragmatic demands of institutional and global academic practice.
- In final analysis, this survey portrays Tanzanian African Studies as a field conscientiously working through the long decolonial turn. The journey from epistemological critique to the consolidation of robust, alternative paradigms is inevitably protracted and non-linear. The current landscape is not one of deficiency, but of dynamic negotiation—between heritage and innovation, between global engagement and local rootedness, and between ideological commitment and scholarly pluralism. The ongoing interrogation of epistemological frameworks is, therefore, not a sign of crisis but the defining characteristic of a maturing discipline. It is through this rigorous self-examination and continuous dialogue that Tanzanian African Studies will ultimately forge a more authentic and authoritative voice, contributing a uniquely positioned perspective to the global understanding of Africa. The period from 2021 to 2026 has thus been a crucial phase of stocktaking and reorientation, setting
- Methodological NoteCross-sectional national survey employing stratified random sampling of academic staff, researchers, and postgraduate students across Tanzanian universities (2021–2026).