Journal Design Engineering Masthead
African Civil Engineering Journal | 05 May 2021

Methodological Evaluation and Cost-Effectiveness of Manufacturing Systems in Nigeria

A Randomised Field Trial
A, d, e, b, a, y, o, A, d, e, w, u, n, m, i, ,, I, b, r, a, h, i, m, S, u, l, e, i, m, a, n, ,, C, h, i, a, m, a, k, a, O, k, o, n, k, w, o
Manufacturing SystemsCost-effectivenessField ExperimentIndustrial Engineering
Lean cellular systems showed 18.7% greater cost-effectiveness than batch systems.
22% reduction in work-in-progress inventory under the lean configuration.
15% increase in labour productivity observed in treatment plants.
Method demonstrates feasibility of rigorous field experiments in industrial engineering.

Abstract

{ "background": "The manufacturing sector in Nigeria faces persistent challenges in optimising production systems for cost-effectiveness. Existing evaluations often rely on retrospective data or theoretical models, lacking rigorous, real-world evidence on the comparative performance of different operational methodologies.", "purpose and objectives": "This case study aimed to methodologically evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of two distinct manufacturing systems—a lean cellular system versus a traditional batch-processing system—within the operational context of Nigerian industrial plants.", "methodology": "A randomised field trial was conducted across multiple manufacturing plants. Plants were randomly assigned to implement either the lean cellular (treatment) or traditional batch (control) system. Cost-effectiveness was measured via a composite metric integrating unit production cost and throughput. The primary analysis used a linear mixed-effects model: $y{ij} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 T{ij} + uj + \\epsilon{ij}$, where $y{ij}$ is the cost-effectiveness score for plant $j$ in period $i$, $T{ij}$ is the treatment indicator, $uj$ is a plant-level random effect, and $\\epsilon{ij}$ is the error term. Robust standard errors were calculated.", "findings": "The lean cellular system demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness, with an estimated mean improvement of 18.7% (95% CI: 12.3% to 25.1%) over the traditional batch system. This gain was primarily driven by a 22% reduction in work-in-progress inventory and a 15% increase in labour productivity. The treatment effect was statistically significant (p < 0.01).", "conclusion": "The randomised field trial provides robust evidence that lean cellular manufacturing systems can be significantly more cost-effective than traditional batch systems in the studied industrial setting. The methodological approach demonstrates the feasibility of rigorous experimental design in real-world engineering management.", "recommendations": "Manufacturing practitioners should prioritise the adoption of lean cellular configurations where product variety and volumes permit. Policymakers and