Journal Design Engineering Masthead
African Civil Engineering Journal | 09 November 2017

Comparative Evaluation of Process-Control System Methodologies for Industrial Risk Reduction in Rwanda

A Quasi-Experimental Analysis
C, l, a, u, d, i, n, e, U, w, a, s, e, N, i, y, o, n, s, e, n, g, a, ,, J, e, a, n, d, e, D, i, e, u, U, w, i, m, a, n, a
Process SafetyRisk AssessmentQuasi-ExperimentIndustrial Rwanda
Hybrid Bow-Tie method showed 22.4% SPI improvement versus 14.1% for HAZOP.
Quasi-experimental design with fixed-effects panel model provides robust evidence.
Methodology choice has substantial impact on risk reduction outcomes.
Findings support barrier-based approaches for regional safety guidelines.

Abstract

{ "background": "Industrial process safety in developing economies often relies on imported control system methodologies without localised validation. There is a critical gap in evidence regarding the comparative efficacy of these systems in mitigating operational risks within specific regional contexts, such as sub-Saharan Africa.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to empirically compare the risk reduction performance of three prevalent process-control system methodologies—Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), and a hybrid Bow-Tie approach—within the industrial landscape of Rwanda.", "methodology": "A quasi-experimental design was employed, implementing each methodology across matched cohorts of manufacturing and processing plants. Risk reduction was quantified using a composite safety performance index (SPI). The primary analysis utilised a fixed-effects panel model: $\\Delta SPI{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 Methodology{it} + \\gamma X{it} + \\alphai + \\epsilon{it}$, where $\\alphai$ denotes plant-level fixed effects. Robust standard errors were clustered at the plant level.", "findings": "The hybrid Bow-Tie methodology yielded a significantly greater mean improvement in SPI (22.4%, 95% CI [18.7, 26.1]) compared to HAZOP (14.1%) and FMEA (9.8%). The treatment effect for Bow-Tie remained statistically significant (p < 0.01) after controlling for plant size and maintenance expenditure.", "conclusion": "The findings demonstrate that the choice of process-control methodology has a substantial, measurable impact on industrial risk reduction outcomes in this context. The structured, barrier-based approach of the hybrid Bow-Tie method proved most effective.", "recommendations": "Industry regulators should consider promoting barrier-based methodologies in safety guidelines. Plant engineers are advised to integrate Bow-Tie analysis into their safety management systems, supplemented by foundational HAZOP studies for process understanding.", "key words": "process safety, risk assessment, quasi-experiment,