Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Prioritization of Road Rehabilitation in Post-Conflict South Sudan Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Abstract
Decades of civil conflict have left South Sudan with one of the most severely degraded road networks in sub-Saharan Africa, with fewer than 250 km of paved roads across a country of approximately 644,329 km². The post-conflict reconstruction challenge is compounded by severely constrained public financial resources, complex political geography, and extreme seasonal flooding that renders up to 40% of the road network inaccessible for extended periods. Effective prioritisation of limited rehabilitation budgets across competing road segments demands a rigorous, transparent, and defensible decision framework. This study develops and applies a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with a Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to prioritise road rehabilitation investments across 32 candidate road segments in South Sudan’s Central Equatoria, Jonglei, and Upper Nile states. Six evaluation criteria are considered: road condition index (RCI), traffic volume (AADT), socio-economic connectivity, flood vulnerability, cost-benefit ratio, and post-conflict accessibility urgency. AHP-derived weights are validated through sensitivity analysis and expert panel consultation (n = 7 engineers). The MCDA framework identifies 8 high-priority segments totalling 412 km and estimates optimal allocation of a hypothetical USD 180 million rehabilitation budget. Results are validated against Independent Roads Needs Assessment (IRNA) survey data, achieving 81.3% ranking concordance. The framework provides a replicable, evidence-based decision support tool for the Ministry of Roads and Bridges (SSNRA) and international development partners.
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Keywords
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewReferences
- Ministry of Roads and Bridges (SSNRA), “National Roads Inventory and Condition Report 2021–2022,” Ministry of Roads and Bridges, Juba, 2022.
- World Bank, “South Sudan Roads and Bridges Project: Appraisal Document,” Report No. PAD2786, Washington, DC, 2019.
- A. de Waal, “When kleptocracy becomes insolvent: Brute causes of the civil war in South Sudan,” African Affairs, vol. 113, no. 452, pp. 347–369, 2014. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adu028.
- International Monetary Fund, “South Sudan: 2022 Article IV Consultation,” IMF Country Report No. 22/352, Washington, DC, 2022.
- World Bank, “South Sudan Road Sector Review,” Washington, DC, 2021.
- African Development Bank, “South Sudan Transport Infrastructure Investment Programme,” TDOA-2020/07, Abidjan, 2020.
- D. Levine and N. Salisbury, “Road prioritisation in post-conflict environments: Lessons from Afghanistan and South Sudan,” Journal of Infrastructure Development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 88–105, 2020.
- T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
- C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 1981.
- J. B. Odoki, H. R. Kerali, and F. Santorini, “Integrated model for quantifying accessibility-benefits in developing countries,” Transportation Research Part A, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 601–623, 2001.
- S. Tigist and T. Aregawi, “Multi-criteria road investment prioritisation in Ethiopia using AHP,” Journal of African Infrastructure, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44–58, 2022.
- SSNRA / Development Partners, “Independent Roads Needs Assessment (IRNA): South Sudan 2022 Survey Report,” Juba, 2022.
- iMMAP, “Humanitarian Access Monitoring Platform: South Sudan Road Passability Data, 2021–2023,” Juba: iMMAP, 2023.
- Flowminder Foundation, “Mobile Phone Mobility Data for Transport Planning in South Sudan,” Tech. Report, Stockholm, 2022.
- UNOCHA, “South Sudan: Seasonal Flood Impact Assessment 2022–2023,” United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Juba, 2023.
- P. Vincke, Multicriteria Decision-Aid. New York: Wiley, 1992.
- E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and S. Kildiene, “State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 165–179, 2014.
- J. Simos, “Evaluer l’impact sur l’environnement,” Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques Romandes, 1990.
- R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York: Wiley, 1976.
- AASHTO, “AASHTO Pavement Management Guide,” 2nd ed., Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2012.
- G. W. Taylor, “The economics of low-volume rural roads in developing countries,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1418, pp. 1–8, 1993.
- M. Kuhn and K. Wirsing, “Road network resilience in fragile states: Methodology and application,” Transport Policy, vol. 58, pp. 18–29, 2017.
- K. Bickel, M. Schöbel, and U. Peschke, “Decision support tools for road infrastructure prioritisation in low-income countries,” World Development, vol. 48, pp. 85–96, 2013.
- FHWA, “Infrastructure Investment and Prioritization Guidebook for Conflict-Affected Countries,” Washington, DC: FHWA, 2020.
- T. Haavisto and G. Kovacs, “Two decades of humanitarian logistics research: Progress and agenda,” Disasters, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 469–489, 2014.
- T. Nguyen, Y. Lee, and J. Park, “Optimal budget allocation for road network rehabilitation using integer programming,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2434–2445, 2020.
- A. Twele et al., “Sentinel-1 based flood mapping: A fully automated processing chain,” Int. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 2990–3004, 2016.
- IPCC, “Climate Change 2021: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability — Africa,” Geneva: IPCC, 2021.
- H. G. Voogd, Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. London: Pion, 1983.
- N. Mardani et al., “Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications: A review,” Economic Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 516–571, 2015.