Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Adaptive Radial-Based Importance Sampling for Efficient Estimation of Low Failure Probabilities in Geotechnical Random-Field Problems
Aduot Madit Anhiem
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19186065
Published: March 23, 2026
Abstract
Crude Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is consistent and unbiased for estimating failure probabilities in geotechnical reliability analysis, but its computational cost scales inversely with Pf: for small failure probabilities (Pf < 10⁻³), tens of thousands of slope stability evaluations may be required to achieve acceptable estimation accuracy. This paper presents Adaptive Radial-Based Importance Sampling (ARBIS) as an efficient alternative. ARBIS relocates sampling effort from the entire standard normal space to a neighbourhood of the design point the point on the limit-state surface G(u) = 0 closest to the origin using a weighted proposal distribution. For the soil-nailed slope case study considered, ARBIS achieves equivalent Pf accuracy with fewer than one-tenth the number of model evaluations required by crude MCS, while simultaneously providing tighter confidence bounds on the Pf estimate. The efficiency advantage is most pronounced precisely in the regime small Pf, high dimensionality from RF discretisation where crude MCS is most costly.
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Aduot Madit Anhiem (2026). Adaptive Radial-Based Importance Sampling for Efficient Estimation of Low Failure Probabilities in Geotechnical Random-Field Problems. African Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19186065
Keywords
⬡ Importance sampling
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewLanguage
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Current Journal
African Geotechnical Engineering
References
- Enevoldsen, I. and Sørensen, J. D. (1994). Reliability-based optimization in structural engineering. Structural Safety, 15(3), 169–196.
- Melchers, R. E. (1989). Importance sampling in structural systems. Structural Safety, 6(1), 3–10.
- Au, S. K. and Beck, J. L. (2001). Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 16(4), 263–277.
- Vanmarcke, E. H. (1983). Random Fields – Analysis and Synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Baecher, G. B. and Christian, J. T. (2003). Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
- Phoon, K. K. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1999). Characterisation of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36, 612–624.
- Sudret, B. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2002). Comparison of finite element reliability methods. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 17, 337–348.
- Griffiths, D. V., Huang, J. and Fenton, G. A. (2009). Influence of spatial variability on slope reliability using 2-D random fields. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(10), 1367–1378.
- Phoon, K. K. (2008). Reliability-Based Design in Geotechnical Engineering. Taylor & Francis, London.
- Rackwitz, R. (2000). Reviewing probabilistic soils modelling. Computers and Geotechnics, 26, 199–223.
- Der Kiureghian, A. and Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112.
- El-Ramly, H., Morgenstern, N. R. and Cruden, D. M. (2002). Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, 665–683.
- Bellin, A. (1991). Numerical generation of random fields with specified spatial correlation structure. Internal Report No. IDR 2/1991, University of Trento, Italy.
- Taib, S. N. L. (2010). A review of soil nailing approaches. UNIMAS E-Journal of Civil Engineering, 1(2).
- Duncan, J. M. (2000). Factor of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(4), 307–316.