Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Deterministic Parameter Variation Versus Random-Field Reliability Assessment in Soil-Nailed Slope Stability
Aduot Madit Anhiem
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19199830
Published: March 24, 2026
Abstract
Geotechnical reliability analysis of slopes traditionally relies on deterministic parameter variation using the First Order Reliability Method (FORM), which treats soil cohesion and friction angle as fixed, bounded scalars. This paper contrasts that conventional approach (Case 1) with a spatially resolved Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Adaptive Radial Based Importance Sampling (ARBIS) framework grounded in random field theory (Case 2), applied to a soil-nailed slope. Results demonstrate that while FORM with set-varied parameters yields smooth, monotonically improving factors of safety as soil strength increases, random field realizations reveal non-negligible probabilities of failure even when the mean factor of safety exceeds unity a phenomenon attributable to localised weak zones created by spatial variability of cohesion and friction angle. Anchoring consistently improves the minimum factor of safety in both approaches. The random field framework better captures the physical heterogeneity of soil, supports identification of critical non-linear failure surfaces, and provides a more economically calibrated reliability-based design.
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Aduot Madit Anhiem (2026). Deterministic Parameter Variation Versus Random-Field Reliability Assessment in Soil-Nailed Slope Stability. African Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19199830
Keywords
Reliability Based Design · Random Fields · FORM · Monte Carlo Simulation · ARBIS · Slope Stability · Soil Nailing · Probability of Failure · Factor of Safety
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewLanguage
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Current Journal
African Geotechnical Engineering
References
- Vanmarcke, E. H. (1983). Random Fields – Analysis and Synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Baecher, G. B. and Christian, J. T. (2003). Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
- Cornell, C. A. (1969). A probability-based structural code. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 66(12), 974–985.
- Kulhawy, F. H. and Phoon, K. K. (2002). Observations on geotechnical reliability-based design development in North America. Proc. Int. Workshop on Foundation Design Codes, Kamakura, 31–48.
- Griffiths, D. V. and Fenton, G. A. (2009). Probabilistic settlement analysis by stochastic and random finite element methods. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(11), 1629–1637.
- Duncan, J. M. (2000). Factor of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(4), 307–316.
- Phoon, K. K. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1999). Characterisation of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36, 612–624.
- El-Ramly, H., Morgenstern, N. R. and Cruden, D. M. (2002). Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, 665–683.
- Sudret, B. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2002). Comparison of finite element reliability methods. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 17, 337–348.
- Enevoldsen, I. and Sørensen, J. D. (1994). Reliability-based optimization in structural engineering. Structural Safety, 15(3), 169–196.
- Elkateb, T., Chalaturnyk, R. and Robertson, P. K. (2002). An overview of soil heterogeneity: quantification and implications on geotechnical field problems. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40, 1–15.
- Luo, Z., Atamturktur, S., Juang, C. H., Huang, H. and Lin, P. S. (2011). Probability of serviceability failure in a braced excavation in spatially random field: Fuzzy finite element approach. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 1031–1040.
- Schweiger, H. F. and Peschl, G. M. (2005). Reliability analysis in geotechnics with the random set finite element method. Computers and Geotechnics, 32(6), 422–435.
- Rackwitz, R. (2000). Reviewing probabilistic soils modelling. Computers and Geotechnics, 26, 199–223.
- Taib, S. N. L. (2010). A review of soil nailing approaches. UNIMAS E-Journal of Civil Engineering, 1(2).
- Honjo, Y. (2011). Challenges in geotechnical reliability based design. ISGSR 2011, Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau, ISBN 978-3-939230-01-4.
- Mohsen, A., Kourosh, S., Mostafa, S. and Mehrdad, H. (2011). Uncertainty and reliability analysis applied to slope stability: a case study from Sungun Copper Mine. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29, 581–596.
- US Army Corps of Engineers (1995). Introduction to Probability and Reliability Methods for Use in Geotechnical Engineering. ETL 1110-2-547.
- © Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 2012 | Page PAGE 1