African Petroleum Engineering

Advancing Scholarship Across the Continent

Vol. 2002 No. 1 (2002)

View Issue TOC

Evaluating Process-Control Systems Adoption Rates in Uganda Using Difference-in-Differences Methodology

Otombe Sebulu, Department of Civil Engineering, Busitema University Ebugwu Tumweseko, Busitema University Mandima Mukaba, Department of Sustainable Systems, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) Obbo Okello, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18750821
Published: November 20, 2002

Abstract

Process-control systems (PCS) are critical for optimising operations in various industries, including petroleum engineering. In Uganda, adoption rates of PCS vary significantly across different sectors and regions. A DID model was employed to analyse data from multiple sites representing different contexts within Uganda. The model accounts for pre-existing differences and potential confounding variables to isolate the effect of PCS adoption incentives on operational performance. The analysis revealed a significant increase in PCS adoption rates in regions where training programmes were implemented, indicating that targeted educational initiatives can accelerate uptake. This study contributes to the literature by offering empirical evidence on how specific interventions can enhance the diffusion of advanced technologies like process-control systems in developing countries. Based on findings, policymakers and industry leaders should prioritise collaborative training programmes as a key strategy for promoting PCS adoption across Uganda's petroleum sector. The maintenance outcome was modelled as $Y_{it}=\beta_0+\beta_1X_{it}+u_i+\varepsilon_{it}$, with robustness checked using heteroskedasticity-consistent errors.

How to Cite

Otombe Sebulu, Ebugwu Tumweseko, Mandima Mukaba, Obbo Okello (2002). Evaluating Process-Control Systems Adoption Rates in Uganda Using Difference-in-Differences Methodology. African Petroleum Engineering, Vol. 2002 No. 1 (2002). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18750821

Keywords

UgandanPetroleumMethodologyAdoptionEvaluationDifference-in-DifferencesAnalytics

References