Journal Design Engineering Masthead
African Structural Engineering | 19 March 2026

A Comparative Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Municipal Infrastructure Asset Management Efficiency in Ghana, 2000–2026

K, w, a, m, e, A, s, a, n, t, e, ,, K, o, f, i, A, g, y, e, m, a, n, -, B, a, d, u, ,, A, m, a, M, e, n, s, a, h, ,, E, s, i, A, n, o, k, y, e
Causal InferenceAsset ManagementMunicipal EngineeringPanel Data
A 15.2 percentage point reduction in lifecycle costs attributed to systematic asset management.
Difference-in-differences model isolates causal effects from secular trends.
Parallel trends assumption validated for pre-intervention period.
Methodology applicable to infrastructure programme evaluation across contexts.

Abstract

{ "background": "Municipal infrastructure asset management systems in many developing nations face persistent challenges in efficiency and performance measurement. The evaluation of interventions aimed at improving these systems requires robust, quasi-experimental methods to isolate causal effects from confounding factors.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aims to methodologically evaluate the efficiency gains of implemented asset management systems across selected municipalities. The primary objective is to apply and critically assess a difference-in-differences (DiD) model for quantifying the causal impact of these systems on key engineering performance indicators.", "methodology": "A comparative panel study design was employed, analysing longitudinal data from treatment and control groups of municipalities. The core statistical model is a two-way fixed effects DiD specification: $Y{it} = \\alpha + \\beta (Treatmenti \\times Postt) + \\gammai + \\deltat + \\epsilon{it}$, where $Y_{it}$ is the efficiency metric. Inference is based on cluster-robust standard errors at the municipal level.", "findings": "Preliminary model specification tests indicate a positive and statistically significant average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) for core efficiency metrics. The ATT estimate for asset lifecycle cost reduction was 15.2 percentage points (95% CI: 11.4, 19.0). Diagnostic testing revealed the parallel trends assumption held for the pre-intervention period.", "conclusion": "The DiD framework provides a rigorous methodological approach for evaluating infrastructure management interventions, offering a counterfactual-based measure of efficiency gains. The model successfully isolates the effect of systematic asset management from secular trends.", "recommendations": "Municipal engineers and policymakers should adopt quasi-experimental evaluation designs for infrastructure programmes. Future research should incorporate granular asset condition data and explore heterogeneous effects across different asset classes and regional contexts.", "key words": "infrastructure asset management, difference-in-differences, causal inference, municipal engineering, performance evaluation, panel data", "contribution statement": "This paper provides a novel application of