Abstract
{ "background": "Railway infrastructure in developing nations faces significant operational risks, with maintenance depot methodologies being a critical yet under-researched component of systemic safety. Current practices are often based on imported standards with limited local validation of their efficacy for risk reduction.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to conduct a comparative evaluation of two distinct maintenance depot systems—centralised versus decentralised—to determine their relative effectiveness in mitigating operational risks within a specific national railway network.", "methodology": "A quasi-experimental design was employed, comparing risk metrics across two matched depot groups over an operational period. The primary analysis used a generalised linear model: $\\log(\\lambdai) = \\beta0 + \\beta1 Xi + Zi^T \\gamma$, where $\\lambdai$ is the incident rate for depot $i$, $Xi$ denotes the depot type, and $Zi$ is a vector of covariates. Inference was based on robust standard errors clustered at the regional level.", "findings": "The decentralised depot system was associated with a statistically significant reduction in reported safety incidents. The estimated incidence rate ratio was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.85), indicating a 28% lower incident rate compared to the centralised model, after controlling for traffic volume and asset age.", "conclusion": "The decentralised maintenance methodology demonstrated superior performance in reducing operational risks under the studied conditions, suggesting that organisational structure and proximity to operational lines are key factors in depot efficacy.", "recommendations": "Railway authorities should consider a phased transition towards a decentralised depot model, supported by targeted investment in local technical capacity and integrated data systems for continuous risk monitoring.", "key words": "railway maintenance, risk reduction, quasi-experiment, depot methodology, infrastructure safety, comparative study", "contribution statement": "This paper provides the first quasi-experimental evidence comparing centralised and decentralised maintenance depot systems for railway risk mitigation in