Journal Design Engineering Masthead
African Structural Engineering | 04 August 2019

A Difference-in-Differences Modelling Framework for Evaluating Power-Distribution Equipment Adoption in Kenya, 2000–2026

K, a, m, a, u, O, c, h, i, e, n, g, ,, A, m, i, n, a, H, a, s, s, a, n, ,, W, a, n, j, i, k, u, M, w, a, n, g, i, ,, K, i, p, k, o, r, i, r, L, a, n, g, a, t
causal inferenceinfrastructure evaluationtechnology adoptionquasi-experimental design
Presents a DiD model to quantify causal effects of electrification programmes on equipment adoption.
Specifies core statistical model with cluster-robust standard errors for county-level inference.
Framework detects significant treatment effects when key identifying assumptions are met.
Provides replicable methodology for evaluating engineering and policy interventions in power grids.

Abstract

{ "background": "Evaluating the impact of infrastructure programmes on the adoption of new engineering technologies, such as advanced power-distribution equipment, requires robust quasi-experimental designs. Many existing methods struggle to isolate causal effects from concurrent policy changes and regional development variations.", "purpose and objectives": "This article presents a methodological framework for quantifying the causal effect of a national electrification programme on the adoption rates of modern distribution transformers and switchgear. The objective is to provide a replicable model for engineers and planners to assess technology uptake.", "methodology": "A difference-in-differences (DiD) modelling framework is specified. The core statistical model is $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 \\text{Treat}i + \\beta2 \\text{Post}t + \\delta (\\text{Treat}i \\times \\text{Post}t) + \\epsilon{it}$, where $Y{it}$ is the adoption rate in county $i$ at time $t$. Inference relies on cluster-robust standard errors at the county level to account for serial correlation.", "findings": "As this is a methodology article, no empirical results from the application are reported. The framework's application to simulated data indicates that the model can detect a statistically significant average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) of 15–20 percentage points in adoption rates when key identifying assumptions are met.", "conclusion": "The proposed DiD framework provides a rigorous, transparent methodology for evaluating the efficacy of engineering and policy interventions aimed at accelerating the deployment of critical power-grid assets.", "recommendations": "Practitioners applying this method must rigorously test the parallel trends assumption using pre-intervention data and consider staggered adoption designs. Future work should integrate spatial econometric techniques to account for network interdependencies.", "key words": "difference-in-differences, causal inference, power distribution, technology adoption, quasi-experimental design, infrastructure evaluation", "contribution statement": "This paper provides a novel