Journal Design Engineering Masthead
African Structural Engineering | 02 March 2010

A Quasi-Experimental Design for the Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Railway Maintenance Depot Systems in Uganda

N, a, k, a, t, o, K, i, g, o, z, i, ,, M, o, s, e, s, S, s, e, k, a, n, d, i
Railway MaintenanceCost-EffectivenessQuasi-Experimental DesignInfrastructure Management
A novel quasi-experimental design for causal inference in infrastructure management.
Centralised depot systems reduced maintenance costs by 17.5% versus decentralised models.
Methodological framework applicable to resource-constrained operational environments.
Stable asset availability maintained alongside significant cost efficiencies.

Abstract

{ "background": "The cost-effectiveness of railway maintenance depot systems in developing economies is poorly understood, with a lack of robust methodological frameworks for evaluation under real-world constraints.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to develop and apply a novel quasi-experimental design to rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different maintenance depot systems, focusing on operational efficiency and lifecycle costs.", "methodology": "A quasi-experimental design was implemented, comparing a treatment group of depots under a centralised, technology-augmented system against a control group using decentralised, conventional practices. Cost and performance data were collected over an operational period. The primary analysis employed a difference-in-differences model: $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 \\text{Treat}i + \\beta2 \\text{Post}t + \\beta3 (\\text{Treat}i \\times \\text{Post}t) + \\epsilon{it}$, where robust standard errors were clustered at the depot level.", "findings": "The centralised system demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in average maintenance cost per kilometre, with an estimated treatment effect of a 17.5% decrease (95% CI: 12.1% to 22.9%). This was achieved without a concurrent reduction in asset availability, which remained stable across both groups.", "conclusion": "The applied quasi-experimental design proved viable for engineering cost-effectiveness analysis in a resource-constrained setting. The centralised maintenance system was found to be more cost-effective than the decentralised model for the studied network.", "recommendations": "Railway operators should consider phased implementation of centralised, technology-integrated depot systems. Further research should apply this methodological framework to longitudinal data to assess long-term structural performance impacts.", "key words": "quasi-experimental design, cost-effectiveness, railway maintenance, depot systems, infrastructure management, difference-in-differences", "contribution statement": "This paper provides a novel methodological framework for causal