African Structural Engineering

Advancing Scholarship Across the Continent

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010)

View Issue TOC

A Randomised Field Trial Methodology for Evaluating Maintenance Depot Risk Reduction in Ghana

Abena Serwaa Adjei, University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA) Nana Ama Boateng, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) Kofi Mensah, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) Kwame Asare, University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18971746
Published: January 15, 2010

Abstract

{ "background": "Transport maintenance depots in Ghana are critical infrastructure nodes where systemic safety and operational risks are concentrated. Current risk assessment methodologies are largely observational and lack rigorous causal inference for evaluating intervention effectiveness.", "purpose and objectives": "This article presents a novel methodological framework for conducting a randomised field trial to causally evaluate engineering and procedural interventions aimed at reducing depot-wide risk. The primary objective is to detail a protocol for randomisation, measurement, and analysis suitable for complex, operational industrial environments.", "methodology": "The methodology employs a cluster-randomised, waitlist-controlled design. Depots are the unit of randomisation. The core intervention is a bundled package of engineered safety upgrades and revised maintenance protocols. Primary outcome is a composite risk score derived from audit checklists and incident data. The analysis uses a linear mixed model: $Y{ij} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 T{ij} + uj + \\epsilon{ij}$, where $Y{ij}$ is the risk score for depot $j$ at time $i$, $T{ij}$ is the treatment indicator, $uj$ is a depot random effect, and $\\epsilon{ij}$ is the error term. Inference is based on cluster-robust standard errors.", "findings": "As a methodology article, this paper presents no empirical trial results. However, the proposed design is shown to be feasible through a pilot study, which indicated a high likelihood of detecting a clinically meaningful risk reduction of 30% with 80% power, given an intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.05.", "conclusion": "The outlined randomised field trial methodology provides a robust, evidence-based framework for evaluating depot risk reduction strategies, overcoming limitations of prior quasi-experimental approaches.", "recommendations": "Researchers applying this methodology should conduct thorough site-specific power analyses, ensure blinding of outcome assessors, and plan for intent-to-treat analysis to maintain trial integrity in operational settings.", "key words": "randomised controlled trial

How to Cite

Abena Serwaa Adjei, Nana Ama Boateng, Kofi Mensah, Kwame Asare (2010). A Randomised Field Trial Methodology for Evaluating Maintenance Depot Risk Reduction in Ghana. African Structural Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18971746

Keywords

Randomised controlled trialRisk assessment methodologyTransport infrastructure maintenanceSub-Saharan AfricaDepot safety managementField experimentOperational risk reduction

References