Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)

View Issue TOC

Optimization of Bridge Placement Along Petroleum Logistics Corridors Using GIS and Network Analysis in South Sudan

Aduot Madit Anhiem, UNICAF / Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; UniAthena / Guglielmo Marconi University, Rome, Italy Perak, Malaysia ORCID 0009-0003-7755-1011
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19063748
Published: August 7, 2025

Abstract

The petroleum logistics network of South Sudan spans 1,865 km of classified roads crossing more than 58 river channels, of which only 17 (29%) are currently bridged. During the annual wet season, unbridged crossings render 340–520 km of oil access road intermittently impassable, disrupting crude oil tanker operations for 15–120 days per year and imposing estimated economic losses of USD 68–140 million annually. Determining which of the remaining 41 crossings to bridge, and in what sequence, given a constrained capital budget of USD 80–120 million, constitutes a complex spatial optimisation problem requiring integration of GIS-based multi-criteria analysis, graph-theoretic network performance modelling, and economic cost-benefit analysis. This paper presents a comprehensive GIS and network analysis framework to optimise bridge placement across five petroleum logistics corridors — Juba–Malakal, Juba–Bentiu, Malakal–Renk, Bentiu–Wau, and Juba–Torit — applying three complementary optimisation methods: the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for site prioritisation, Pareto front analysis for budget-constrained portfolio selection, and betweenness centrality analysis for network-level impact quantification. Ten candidate bridge sites are evaluated against eight weighted criteria including traffic volume, flood hazard, river hydraulics, detour cost, geotechnical conditions, seismic hazard, social access equity, and environmental sensitivity. The TOPSIS-optimal sequence identifies the White Nile km 320 crossing (Route A) as the highest-priority investment, with an annual savings-to-cost ratio of USD 4.85M per USD 18.5M capital investment and a Criticality Index of 0.847. Implementation of the full five-priority portfolio generates a 31% reduc

Full Text:

Read the Full Article

The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.

How to Cite

Aduot Madit Anhiem (2025). Optimization of Bridge Placement Along Petroleum Logistics Corridors Using GIS and Network Analysis in South Sudan. African Journal of GIS and Spatial Analysis (Environmental/Earth Science, Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19063748

Keywords

GISnetwork analysisbridge placementpetroleum logisticsSouth SudanTOPSISPareto optimisation

Research Snapshot

Desktop reading view
Language
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Current Journal
African Journal of GIS and Spatial Analysis (Environmental/Earth Science

References

  • IMF. (2023). South Sudan: 2023 Article IV Consultation — Staff Report. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
  • MoRB. (2021). South Sudan National Road Asset Register. Ministry of Roads and Bridges, Ministry of Roads and Bridges, Juba.
  • World Bank. (2024). South Sudan Infrastructure Restoration Project (PAD5318). World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.
  • World Bank. (2023). South Sudan Economic Update — Roads to Recovery. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.
  • Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Latora, V., & Marchiori, M. (2001). Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical Review Letters, 87(19), 198701.
  • Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726.
  • Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
  • Odeck, J. (1996). Ranking of regional road investment in Norway. Transportation, 23(2), 123–140.
  • Adey, B., Hajdin, R., & Brühwiler, E. (2003). Effect of common cause failures on indirect costs. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 8(6), 408–418.
  • Masood, M. U., Khan, S. N., & Haider, S. (2021). Fluvial flood hazard mapping using GIS in Pakistan. Applied Water Science, 11(3), 1–15.
  • World Bank. (2012). Roads and the Economy: Updating and Improving World Bank Road Economics. Transport Note TN-5. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.
  • Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
  • Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria Optimization (2nd ed.). Springer, Berlin.
  • Richardson, E. V., & Davis, S. R. (2001). Evaluating Scour at Bridges (HEC-18, 4th ed.). Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-NHI 01-001, Washington, D.C.
  • Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York.
  • ESRI. (2023). ArcGIS Pro 3.2: GIS and Mapping Software. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
  • NetworkX. (2023). NetworkX 3.2 Reference Documentation. Python Graph Library. https://networkx.org
  • Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems (5th ed.). Routledge, New York.
  • Donnges, C., Edmonds, G., & Johannessen, B. (2017). Rural Road Maintenance: Sustaining the Benefits of Improved Access. ILO, Bangkok.
  • OCHA. (2019). South Sudan Humanitarian Needs Overview 2020 — Flooding Impact Assessment. United Nations, New York.
  • Bader, T., & Santos, G. (2018). Infrastructure investment prioritization in fragile states. Journal of Development Economics, 132, 174–198.
  • Conversion notesMessage(type='warning', message='An unrecognised element was ignored: {http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/math}oMath')