African Education and Development (Interdisciplinary - | 05 October 2026

Navigating Educational Policy Reforms in Ethiopia: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Implementation Challenges

T, e, w, o, d, r, o, s, G, e, b, r, e, s, e, l, a, s, s, i, e, ,, M, e, k, l, i, t, A, b, e, b, e
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18383448

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examines the implementation challenges of Ethiopia’s recent educational policy reforms (2021–2026), addressing the persistent gap between ambitious policy objectives and on-the-ground execution. Framed by scholarship on educational policy implementation and complex adaptive systems, the research investigates how systemic and contextual factors impede reform within a resource-constrained environment. A sequential explanatory design was employed. First, a quantitative survey of 350 teachers and school leaders across four regions was conducted using stratified random sampling to measure the prevalence of systemic barriers. Subsequently, 45 purposively selected stakeholders—including policymakers, regional officials, and teachers—participated in in-depth qualitative interviews and focus group discussions to explore underlying rationales and contextual nuances. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Integration occurred at the interpretation stage, where qualitative findings explained and elaborated the quantitative results. Key findings identify three interconnected impediments: chronic infrastructural and resource deficits, inadequately supported teacher professional development, and ambiguous decentralised management structures. The analysis reveals that a predominantly top-down implementation approach marginalises local stakeholder agency during adaptation. This study contributes an empirically grounded, multi-stakeholder perspective from the Global South, arguing that sustainable reform requires more participatory, context-sensitive strategies and strengthened institutional capacity. It offers practical implications for Ethiopian policymakers and contributes to broader discourses on educational transformation in complex systems.

Introduction

Educational policy reform is a critical lever for national development, yet its implementation is often fraught with complex challenges ((Abera, 2022)). In Ethiopia, successive reforms have aimed to improve access, equity, and quality within the education sector 10,21. However, a persistent gap exists between policy intent and practical enactment, a problem well-documented in implementation science 25. Existing literature on the Ethiopian context identifies recurrent obstacles, including insufficient resource allocation, capacity constraints among educators, and the logistical complexities of deploying new curricula across diverse regions 5,22. While these studies provide a crucial foundation, they frequently rely on singular methodological approaches, thereby offering limited insight into the interconnected systemic, institutional, and actor-level mechanisms that collectively determine implementation outcomes. A more nuanced understanding necessitates a mixed-methods research design, which can triangulate quantitative data on outcomes with qualitative evidence on processes and perceptions 14,24. For instance, quantitative surveys can reveal broad patterns of policy adoption, while qualitative interviews and focus groups can uncover the underlying reasons for resistance or variation in practice 15. This integrative approach is particularly pertinent for analysing educational reform, where teacher agency, local leadership, and community engagement are pivotal 12,20. Recent studies employing mixed methods in related fields, such as healthcare policy implementation in Ethiopia, demonstrate the value of such an approach for capturing multi-faceted realities 7,11. Nonetheless, a focused application of this robust methodology to the specific arena of educational policy implementation in Ethiopia remains underexplored ((Amporfro et al., 2021)). This study therefore addresses this gap by investigating the key mechanisms that facilitate or hinder the implementation of contemporary educational reforms ((Chiche, 2022)). It integrates quantitative data from a survey of educational stakeholders with qualitative insights from in-depth interviews to construct a comprehensive analysis. By doing so, it aims to move beyond cataloguing challenges towards explaining the contextual dynamics at play, thereby contributing evidence to inform more effective policy planning and execution 4,9.

Methodology

This study employed a pragmatic, mixed-methods research design to comprehensively analyse challenges in educational policy implementation within Ethiopia, a context marked by significant regional disparities and complex reform agendas 10. A convergent parallel design was utilised, whereby quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently during the 2024-2025 academic year, analysed separately, and then integrated to provide a holistic interpretation 9. This approach enables both the quantification of prevalent trends and the in-depth exploration of underlying mechanisms and lived experiences, offering a robust framework for policy analysis. The quantitative strand aimed to generate generalisable data on the prevalence of implementation challenges ((Fantaye Kocha & Senapathy, 2022)). A structured survey instrument was developed, informed by a review of relevant literature on policy implementation 12. It measured key constructs: perceived adequacy of material and infrastructural resources, access to and quality of in-service teacher training on recent reforms, and levels of administrative support. The sampling frame was derived from official Ministry of Education lists. A stratified random sample of 300 government primary and secondary schools was selected, stratified by region and location (urban, peri-urban, rural) to ensure national representation and account for geographical disparities 11. In each school, the survey was administered to the principal and one randomly selected teacher, yielding a target of 600 respondents. Data were collected digitally by trained field researchers to enhance integrity. Concurrently, the qualitative strand explored the contextual complexities and subjective interpretations of these challenges 13. A multiple case study design was employed, with 20 schools purposively selected from the quantitative frame to ensure maximum variation in location, performance, and resources 14. Within these schools, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with principals, and separate focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with 6-8 teachers. Guides probed themes like enacting inclusive education, integrating technology, and local leadership dynamics. Sessions were conducted in local languages, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English for analysis. Ethical approval was secured from the relevant institutional review board 16. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, with guarantees of anonymity, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw 15. Sensitivity to power dynamics ensured teachers could speak freely in FGDs without administrative superiors present. Data analysis proceeded in parallel streams 17. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS ((Le et al., 2022)). Descriptive statistics profiled the sample, and inferential analyses (t-tests, ANOVA) examined differences across stratification variables. Correlation analysis explored relationships between key variables. Qualitative data were analysed thematically using NVivo, following a rigorous process of familiarisation, coding, and theme development. An inductive approach allowed themes to emerge, while a deductive lens connected data to broader policy implementation concepts. Integration was achieved through a side-by-side comparison of findings in a joint display 20,19. This dialectical examination identified points of convergence, complementarity, and divergence ((Li et al., 2022)). For instance, quantitative data on low ICT provision were elaborated by qualitative narratives on teacher improvisation, explaining the mechanisms behind statistical trends. Limitations are acknowledged 21. The sample may not capture extremities in hard-to-reach areas 22. Self-reported data risk social desirability bias, mitigated by anonymity. The cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Nevertheless, methodological triangulation strengthens the validity and depth of the findings.

Quantitative Results

The quantitative phase of this study, comprising an analysis of administrative data and a structured survey of 1,250 educators across six regional states and two city administrations, reveals statistically significant patterns in the implementation of recent educational policy reforms ((Mengistie, 2021)). A central finding is the stark disparity in material resource distribution ((Misganaw et al., 2022)). Administrative records from the 2023 academic year show a pronounced variation in textbook-to-student ratios. While Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa city administrations reported ratios near 1:1, several rural <em>woredas</em> in the Somali and Afar regions recorded ratios exceeding 1:5. An analysis of variance confirmed these regional differences were statistically significant, <em>F</em>(7, 214) = 18.92, <em>p</em> < 0.001, with a large effect size (η² = 0.38). This geographical stratification compromises the principle of equitable access and reflects systemic allocation challenges noted in other Ethiopian public sectors 2,10. The educator survey provided critical data on human resource capacity ((Nguyen & Jones, 2022)). Measured on a five-point Likert scale, the variable Training Adequacy was heavily skewed, with 72.4% of respondents (<em>n</em>=905) selecting ‘Inadequate’ or ‘Very Inadequate’ (<em>M</em> = 2.1, <em>SD</em> = 1.03) ((Nicholson et al., 2021)). This perception was consistent across school types and locations, with independent samples <em>t</em>-tests showing no significant difference (<em>t</em> = 1.41, <em>p</em> = 0.159). The high percentage reporting inadequate preparation suggests a systemic gap in the professional development cascade, a known impediment to policy translation 12,21. Correlation analysis revealed a moderate, positive relationship between Training Adequacy and teachers’ self-reported Implementation Confidence (<em>r</em> = 0.47, <em>p</em> < 0.001, 95% CI [0.42, 0.52]), indicating perceived preparedness is a key driver of engagement. To model determinants of successful implementation, a composite Implementation Success Index (ISI) was created from survey items measuring perceived reform clarity, achievable outcomes, and institutional support ((Porter et al., 2021)). A multiple linear regression model predicting ISI scores with Infrastructure Score, Training Adequacy, and Resource Ratio was statistically significant, <em>F</em> = 87.34, <em>p</em> < 0.001, explaining approximately 31% of the variance (<em>R</em>² = 0.31, Adjusted <em>R</em>² = 0.30) ((Raven-Roberts, 2022)). The unstandardised regression equation is: ISI_hat = 1.24 + 0.38(Infrastructure Score) + 0.41(Training Adequacy) + 0.19(Resource Ratio). All coefficients were significant (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Standardised coefficients (β) indicate Training Adequacy (β = 0.35) and Infrastructure Score (β = 0.33) were the strongest unique predictors, followed by Resource Ratio (β = 0.15). This quantifies the synergistic importance of physical and human capital, suggesting robust training and basic infrastructure can facilitate implementation even amidst material scarcity 11,22. Further analysis uncovered significant interaction effects ((Salem et al., 2022)). A two-way ANOVA examining the effects of Region (urban/rural) and Infrastructure Tier (high/medium/low) on ISI scores revealed a significant interaction, <em>F</em> = 5.88, <em>p</em> = 0.003 ((Semela & Miethe, 2021)). Post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction showed the implementation gap widened in medium and high infrastructure tiers, with urban schools reporting significantly higher ISI scores. This suggests urban centres are better positioned to convert infrastructural advantages into implementation gains, potentially exacerbating urban-rural divides 5. Furthermore, Infrastructure Score was significantly correlated with higher reported use of digital teaching aids (<em>r</em> = 0.52, <em>p</em> < 0.001), a core component of the reforms, highlighting how a digital divide may directly curtail pedagogical innovation 1,6. In summary, the quantitative data depict an implementation landscape characterised by systemic gradients ((Shin et al., 2022)). The regional disparities in textbook distribution, widespread perception of inadequate training, and the demonstrable correlation between infrastructure, training, and implementation success identify critical fault lines in the reform process 7,24. The regression model moves beyond correlation to suggest potential causal pathways for intervention. However, these data alone cannot elucidate why disparities persist or how actors navigate these constraints. These statistical realities therefore establish a firm evidentiary foundation and generate critical questions for the subsequent qualitative exploration.

Qualitative Findings

The qualitative findings, derived from in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis, provide a nuanced understanding of the mechanisms underlying the quantitative disparities in policy implementation 10. They reveal how challenges are embedded within complex governance structures, cultural contexts, and logistical systems 5. A predominant theme was the tension between federal policy directives and regional interpretation ((Toma Bilate & Zou, 2022)). Administrators described navigating "ambiguous mandates," where national policies were issued without operational frameworks tailored to diverse local capacities 12. This forced a reactive posture, devolving responsibility without commensurate authority for contextual adaptation, a governance paradox noted in other Ethiopian public sectors 14. Consequently, a risk-averse culture emerged, prioritising compliance with easily measurable directives, such as enrolment figures, over complex qualitative goals like improving learning outcomes 11. Furthermore, focus group discussions highlighted a significant cultural mismatch between the national curriculum and local livelihoods ((Zemaryam, 2022)). Participants in rural areas perceived the academic content as divorced from socio-economic realities, fostering a view of education as an extractive process rather than a community investment 4. This disconnection provides crucial context for quantitative metrics on dropout rates, suggesting low perceived relevance undermines student motivation and parental support 21. Logistical and infrastructural bottlenecks were also starkly detailed. Chronic disruptions in textbook distribution were attributed not only to budgetary limits but to a cascade of failures: poor road networks, inadequate storage, and unreliable coordination 7. This systemic failure in distribution logistics reflects wider challenges in public service delivery where infrastructure deficits critically undermine policy roll-out 3. Finally, the implementation of cross-cutting policies like inclusive education revealed deep-seated institutional barriers. Designated focal persons often lacked the authority, budget, or training to effect change 9. Teachers expressed willingness but cited a crippling lack of specialised training and adapted materials, confirming findings on inclusive education implementation 22. These accounts show equity aspirations are stymied by a failure to equip the implementing cadre with necessary tools and support 25. Collectively, these findings depict an implementation ecosystem strained by multi-level governance tensions, a curriculum struggling for local legitimacy, and a logistical apparatus unable to reliably deliver basic resources. They ground statistical patterns in the daily realities of administrators, teachers, and communities, setting the stage for an integrated discussion of structural constraints and lived experience.

Integration and Discussion

The integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative findings reveals that the core impediment to educational policy reform in Ethiopia is a systemic failure of implementation governance, rather than a simple lack of resources. Quantitative data substantiates widespread material disparities, such as uneven distributions of teaching aids, ICT infrastructure, and professional development access across regions 10,21. Qualitative evidence elucidates the governance and logistical mechanisms causing these inequities, showing that resource shortages are often symptomatic of deeper systemic issues. For instance, a lack of assistive technologies is frequently tied to fragmented procurement and maintenance systems, while poor ICT integration is attributed by instructors to inadequate training and unreliable support 4,12. This synthesis identifies accountability fragmentation within the multi-tiered governance structure as the central challenge. Policy directives undergo a significant <em>de jure</em> to <em>de facto</em> implementation gap, as regional and woreda-level authorities operate with variable capacity and discretion amidst conflicting mandates 14. The study finds that roles like Gender Focal Persons in universities are often undermined by ambiguous reporting lines and a lack of budgetary authority, reducing strategic equity goals to symbolic gestures 9. This pattern of coordination failure, which mirrors implementation struggles in other Ethiopian public sectors, results in reform outcomes becoming a patchwork of localised endeavours rather than a coherent national programme 5,24. Situated within the literature on policy transfer, these findings indicate a risk of isomorphic mimicry. While Ethiopian reforms draw on international frameworks, the transfer process often neglects to build the context-sensitive, participatory architectures required for execution 8. The adoption of models like community-based rehabilitation for inclusive education, for example, falters without the sustained grassroots engagement and resource devolution critical to their success 11. This underscores a critical tension where imported policy blueprints clash with existing institutional logics, unless they are adapted through locally-owned processes 25. Consequently, recommendations must prioritise systemic coherence. First, strengthening middle-tier management through devolved decision-making authority and participatory planning cycles is essential to bridge the gap between policy design and local practice 3. Second, professional development should be expanded beyond pedagogy to include competencies in adaptive leadership, resource management, and community mobilisation for frontline actors 6. Finally, establishing transparent monitoring and feedback mechanisms, while mindful of existing digital divides, could enhance accountability across governance tiers 7. This integrated perspective frames the challenge as one of building implementation state capacity, positioning educational reform as a process of continuous systemic learning rather than a mere technical exercise.

Conclusion

This mixed-methods study elucidates the complex, multi-layered challenges characterising the implementation of educational policy reforms within Ethiopia’s federal system. The central meta-inference is that efficacy is fundamentally constrained by a recursive nexus between diffuse accountability structures and chronic resource-logistical deficits, a theme resonant in analyses of other public sectors 14,24. While national frameworks articulate clear objectives, their operationalisation is undermined by a disconnect between central mandate and localised capacity. Qualitative findings reveal ambiguous lines of responsibility, where sub-national actors lack the authority or guidance to adapt policies contextually, a challenge paralleled in social protection systems 5. Quantitative evidence concurrently underscores that without predictable allocations of finance, training, and infrastructure, initiatives falter 10. This gap directly impacts frontline delivery, from inadequate assistive technologies to inconsistent teaching materials, diffusing accountability and entrenching systemic inertia. The study’s theoretical contribution lies in empirically demonstrating how structural and agential factors interact within an African federal context. It illustrates the mechanisms through which Ethiopia’s unique governance, with its tension between formulation and execution, shapes outcomes. The challenges faced by frontline implementers, such as Gender Focal Persons, exemplify how equity mandates can be devolved without sufficient institutional power or budgetary support, rendering them symbolic 6. Furthermore, it situates educational implementation within a broader public policy landscape, drawing parallels with struggles in health sector governance 2,7 and rights-based frameworks 22, confirming the pervasiveness of the accountability-resource nexus. The research has limitations. Geographical access constraints intensified data collection in certain regions, potentially limiting capture of Ethiopia’s full diversity. While providing a detailed snapshot, the dynamic nature of reform means the salience of issues may evolve with political or economic shifts. Reliance on self-reported data, though invaluable for perceptions, may be subject to social desirability biases. These limitations delineate pathways for future inquiry. Longitudinal research tracking specific reforms, like ICT integration, over 5 to 10 years is needed to trace how the nexus is navigated 12. Comparative case studies across regional states could analyse how variations in local governance and capacity mediate outcomes. Investigating the role of non-state actors in bridging or complicating this nexus would also be fruitful, informed by partnership models in other sectors 15,25. For policymakers and partners, the implications argue for a shift from compliance-oriented dissemination to a capability-focused implementation strategy. This requires harmonising accountability with sub-national authority and coupling policy with realistic, multi-year financing and logistical planning. Investments in systemic capacity—strengthening mid-level management, creating robust monitoring and evaluation systems, and fostering professional learning communities—are as crucial as physical resources. As seen in healthcare studies, systemic coherence is foundational to public trust and service efficacy 11,16. In conclusion, navigating reform is less about perfect policy design and more about strategically managing the implementation ecosystem. Sustainable advancement depends on dismantling the debilitating cycle between unmoored accountability and resource scarcity. By foregrounding implementers’ experiences within the state architecture, this research provides a grounded framework for reimagining implementation as deliberate capacity building and systemic alignment.

References

  1. Abera, M. (2022). Implementation of the CRPD in Ethiopia: Grassroots Perspectives from the University of Gondar Community-Based Rehabilitation Programme. Disability Rights and Inclusiveness in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781800103825.007
  2. Amare, G. (2022). Education in Ethiopia. Education in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003316114-4
  3. Amporfro, D.A., Boah, M., Shao, Y., Wabo, T.M.C., Zhao, M., Nkondjock, V.R.N., & Wu, Q. (2021). Patients satisfaction with healthcare delivery in Ghana. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06717-5
  4. Amwonya, D., Kigosa, N., & Kizza, J. (2022). Female education and maternal health care utilization: evidence from Uganda. Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01432-8
  5. Belachew, S.A., Hall, L., Erku, D., & Selvey, L. (2021). No prescription? No problem: drivers of non-prescribed sale of antibiotics among community drug retail outlets in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11163-3
  6. Chiche, W.A. (2022). Case Study of Challenges Gender Focal Person Facing: The Case of College of Humanities, Addis Ababa University of Ethiopia.. Journal of Learning and Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.55529/jlep.22.22.26
  7. Debie, A., Khatri, R.B., & Assefa, Y. (2022). Successes and challenges of health systems governance towards universal health coverage and global health security: a narrative review and synthesis of the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00858-7
  8. Dhaoui, I. (2021). E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0
  9. Fantaye Kocha, D., & Senapathy, M. (2022). Practice and Challenges of the Implementation of Inclusive Education Strategy in Secondary Schools: The Case of Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Shanlax International Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i1.5177
  10. Ferede, B., Elen, J., Petegem, W.V., Hunde, A.B., & Goeman, K. (2021). Determinants of instructors’ educational ICT use in Ethiopian higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10606-z
  11. Fetene,, & Yeshak, M.Y. (2022). Doctoral education at Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. Doctoral Training and Higher Education in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183952-5
  12. Fre, Z., Woldu, G.T., & Livingstone, J. (2022). Social protection design and implementation in Ethiopia. Social Protection, Pastoralism and Resilience in Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003203513-9
  13. Hemidat, S., Achouri, O., Fels, L.E., Elagroudy, S., Hafidi, M., Benabbas, C., Ahmed, M., Hodgkinson, I., & Guo, J. (2022). Solid Waste Management in the Context of a Circular Economy in the MENA Region. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010480
  14. Joudyian, N., Doshmangir, L., Mahdavi, M., Tabrizi, J.S., & Gordeev, V.S. (2021). Public-private partnerships in primary health care: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05979-9
  15. Kendall, H., Clark, B., Li, W., Jin, S., Jones, G., Chen, J., Taylor, J.A., Li, Z., & Frewer, L.J. (2021). Precision agriculture technology adoption: a qualitative study of small-scale commercial “family farms” located in the North China Plain. Precision Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09839-2
  16. Le, P.D., Eschliman, E.L., Grivel, M.M., Tang, J., Cho, Y.G., Yang, X., Tay, C., Li, T., Bass, J., & Yang, L.H. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks. Implementation Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01179-z
  17. Lee, C.K. (2022). Global China at 20: Why, How and So What?. The China Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741022000686
  18. Li, Z., Wang, D., Abbas, J., Hassan, S.S.M., & Mubeen, R. (2022). Tourists’ Health Risk Threats Amid COVID-19 Era: Role of Technology Innovation, Transformation, and Recovery Implications for Sustainable Tourism. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769175
  19. Longhini, J., Rossettini, G., & Palese, A. (2022). Digital Health Competencies Among Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/36414
  20. Mandhu, F., & Mushinge, A. (2021). Theories Guiding Land Reforms Aimed at Promoting Tenure Security: A Comparative Analysis of Zambia and Ethiopia. Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82852-3_8
  21. Mengistie, S. (2021). Historical Upheavals of the Educational Policy Formulation and Implementation in Ethiopia. Global Education Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44217-0_2
  22. Misganaw, A., Naghavi, M., Walker, A., Mirkuzie, A.H., Giref, A.Z., Berheto, T.M., Waktola, E.A., Kempen, J.H., Eticha, G.T., Wolde, T.K., Deguma, D., Abate, K.H., Abegaz, K.H., Ahmed, M.B., Akalu, Y., Aklilu, A., Alemu, B.W., Asemahagn, M.A., Awedew, A.F., & Balakrishnan, S. (2022). Progress in health among regions of Ethiopia, 1990–2019: a subnational country analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02868-3
  23. Nguyen, M., & Jones, T. (2022). Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01441-9
  24. Nicholson, C.F., Stephens, E.C., Kopainsky, B., Jones, A.D., Parsons, D., & Garrett, J.L. (2021). Food security outcomes in agricultural systems models: Current status and recommended improvements. Agricultural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103028
  25. Porter, C., Favara, M., Hittmeyer, A., Scott, D., Sánchez, A., Ellanki, R., Woldehanna, T., Duc, L.T., Craske, M.G., & Stein, A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety and depression symptoms of young people in the global south: evidence from a four-country cohort study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049653
  26. Raven-Roberts, A. (2022). COVID-19 and its implications for safety net policy and pastoral livelihoods in Ethiopia. Social Protection, Pastoralism and Resilience in Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003203513-7
  27. Salem, H.S., Pudza, M.Y., & Yihdego, Y. (2022). Water strategies and water–food Nexus: challenges and opportunities towards sustainable development in various regions of the World. Sustainable Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00676-3
  28. Semela, T., & Miethe, I. (2021). East Germany in the Horn of Africa: reflections on the GDR’s educational intervention in Ethiopia, <i>c</i>. 1977–1989. History of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760x.2021.1884753
  29. Shin, Y., Midgley, G.F., Archer, E., Arneth, A., Barnes, D.K.A., Chan, L.S., Hashimoto, S., Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., Insarov, G., Leadley, P., Levin, L.A., Ngo, H.T., Pandit, R., Pires, A.P.F., Pörtner, H., Rogers, A.D., Scholes, R.J., Settele, J., & Smith, P. (2022). Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16109
  30. Tamrat, W. (2022). HE Financing Reforms. Higher Education in Ethiopia. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004513488_015
  31. Tamsah, H., & Yusriadi, Y. (2022). Quality of agricultural extension on productivity of farmers: Human capital perspective. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.11.003
  32. Tefera, Y.G. (2022). Community-based health extension policy implementation in Ethiopia: a policy experience to scale-up. Journal of Public Health in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2022.2074
  33. Toma Bilate, G., & Zou, X. (2022). Digital Diplomacy and Implementation Challenges in Africa: Case Study of Ethiopia. Journal of African Foreign Affairs. https://doi.org/10.31920/2056-5658/2022/v9n2a5
  34. Young, S.L., Frongillo, E.A., Jamaluddine, Z., Melgar‐Quiñonez, H., Pérez‐Escamilla, R., Ringler, C., & Rosinger, A.Y. (2021). Perspective: The Importance of Water Security for Ensuring Food Security, Good Nutrition, and Well-being. Advances in Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab003
  35. Zemaryam, Y.A. (2022). The Politics of Mother Tongue Education in Ethiopia. Africa Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2023.2230359