Journal Design Emerald Editorial
African Food Systems Research (Interdisciplinary - incl Agri/Env) | 25 November 2001

Evaluating Surveillance Systems in Tanzania

A Time-Series Forecasting Model for Clinical Outcomes, 2000–2026
G, o, d, f, r, e, y, M, b, o, y, a, ,, N, e, e, m, a, M, ., S, w, a, i, ,, M, w, a, j, u, m, a, M, w, i, n, y, i, m, k, u, u
Surveillance EvaluationTime-Series ForecastingPublic Health InformaticsPredictive Modelling
SARIMA model demonstrates robust forecasting accuracy for key clinical indicators.
Projected 18% caseload increase highlights significant upward trend requiring attention.
Evaluation exposes systemic gaps in data granularity affecting forecast precision.
Provides a novel framework for quantitative surveillance system assessment.

Abstract

{ "background": "Public health surveillance systems in sub-Saharan Africa generate vast data, yet their methodological rigour for forecasting clinical burdens is often under-evaluated, limiting proactive resource allocation.", "purpose and objectives": "This case study aimed to methodologically evaluate the forecasting capability of a national surveillance system by developing and validating a time-series model for predicting key clinical outcomes.", "methodology": "We constructed a univariate forecasting model using historical, de-identified surveillance data. The core model was a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) formulation: $yt = \\mu + \\Phi(B^s)\\phi(B)(1-B)^d(1-B^s)^D yt + \\Theta(B^s)\\theta(B)\\epsilont$, where $\\epsilont \\sim N(0, \\sigma^2)$. Model selection was based on minimising the Akaike Information Criterion, with forecast uncertainty quantified using 95% prediction intervals.", "findings": "The model demonstrated robust in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting accuracy for a major clinical indicator. A key finding was a projected 18% increase (95% prediction interval: 12% to 24%) in the annual caseload over the forecast horizon, highlighting a significant upward trend. The evaluation revealed specific systemic gaps in data granularity affecting forecast precision.", "conclusion": "The surveillance system provides a viable foundation for forecasting, but its utility is constrained by data quality and completeness issues. Methodological evaluation through modelling exposes critical points for system strengthening.", "recommendations": "Integrate routine forecasting audits into surveillance system evaluations. Invest in improving the temporal resolution and clinical detail of reported data to enhance model accuracy and public health utility.", "key words": "surveillance evaluation, time-series forecasting, SARIMA, public health informatics, health systems, predictive modelling", "contribution statement": "This study provides a novel methodological framework for the quantitative evaluation of public health surveillance systems' forecasting performance, moving beyond descriptive assessments