Journal Design Clinical Emerald
African Food Systems Research (Interdisciplinary - incl Agri/Env) | 27 February 2003

Randomised Field Trial of Community Health Centre Systems for Clinical Outcomes in Uganda

A Methodological Evaluation
D, a, v, i, d, K, a, t, o, M, u, b, i, r, u, ,, A, i, s, h, a, N, a, l, w, o, g, a, ,, J, u, l, i, u, s, O, p, i, o
Cluster-randomised trialHealth systems evaluationPrimary health careMethodological framework
Intervention increased composite treatment completion rate (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.15–1.76).
Hybrid data verification (routine data + spot-audits) was essential for >90% completeness.
Cluster-randomised design proved feasible for health systems evaluation in Uganda.
Methodological blueprint for experimental evaluation in low-resource primary care settings.

Abstract

{ "background": "Community health centres are pivotal for primary care delivery in sub-Saharan Africa, yet robust methodological frameworks for evaluating their systemic impact on clinical outcomes are lacking. Existing evaluations often rely on observational designs, limiting causal inference.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to methodologically evaluate a novel cluster-randomised field trial design for assessing the impact of a streamlined patient management system on key clinical outcomes within Ugandan community health centres.", "methodology": "We conducted a parallel, two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Forty-eight health centres were randomised (1:1) to implement the new system or continue standard care. The primary outcome was the composite rate of treatment completion for malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhoea in children under five. Analysis used a generalised linear mixed model: $logit(P(Y{ij}=1)) = \\beta0 + \\beta1 X{ij} + uj + e{ij}$, where $u_j$ is the cluster random effect, with robust standard errors.", "findings": "The intervention significantly increased the composite treatment completion rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.76). A key methodological finding was that outcome ascertainment required a hybrid of routine data and spot-audits to achieve >90% data completeness, a threshold below which effect estimates became unstable.", "conclusion": "The trial design proved feasible and generated precise effect estimates, demonstrating that rigorous experimental evaluation of health system interventions in low-resource settings is achievable. The new patient management system improved clinical outcomes.", "recommendations": "Future health systems research in similar contexts should adopt cluster-randomised designs and invest in hybrid data verification systems to ensure data integrity. Policymakers should consider scaling the evaluated management system.", "key words": "health systems research, cluster randomised trial, implementation science, primary health care, sub-Saharan Africa, methodological evaluation", "contribution statement": "This paper provides a novel methodological blueprint for conducting