Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)

View Issue TOC

A Methodological Evaluation and Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Public Health Surveillance System Adoption in Rwanda, 2000–2024

Claudine Murekatete, Department of Clinical Research, African Leadership University (ALU), Kigali Jean de Dieu Uwimana, Department of Clinical Research, University of Rwanda Marie Chantal Uwase, Department of Surgery, University of Rwanda Jean Paul Mugabo, Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18952346
Published: May 16, 2024

Abstract

{ "background": "The methodological rigour of evaluating national public health surveillance systems in low-resource settings remains underdeveloped, limiting the ability to attribute health outcomes to specific system implementations.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to conduct a methodological evaluation of surveillance system assessments and to quantify the causal impact of a major integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) adoption on reporting completeness.", "methodology": "We performed a systematic methodological critique of evaluation frameworks. A quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DiD) design was employed, using panel data from administrative districts. The core model was $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 (\\text{Treat}i \\times \\text{Post}t) + \\gammai + \\deltat + \\epsilon{it}$, where $\\gammai$ and $\\deltat$ are district and time fixed effects. Inference was based on cluster-robust standard errors at the district level.", "findings": "The methodological review identified a predominant reliance on cross-sectional designs lacking counterfactual reasoning. The DiD analysis estimated that IDSR adoption increased reporting completeness by 23.4 percentage points (95% CI: 18.1 to 28.7). This effect was statistically significant (p<0.001) and robust to multiple sensitivity checks.", "conclusion": "The adoption of the integrated system caused a substantial and significant improvement in surveillance reporting metrics. Methodological approaches incorporating causal inference designs are critical for generating credible evidence of public health programme impact.", "recommendations": "National health ministries should integrate quasi-experimental evaluation designs into routine surveillance system assessments. Future research should apply similar causal inference methods to evaluate the impact on direct health outcomes, such as outbreak detection timeliness.", "key words": "public health surveillance, impact evaluation, difference-in-differences, causal inference, health systems, reporting completeness", "contribution statement": "This paper provides a novel application of a robust quasi-experimental design

Full Text:

Read the Full Article

The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.

How to Cite

Claudine Murekatete, Jean de Dieu Uwimana, Marie Chantal Uwase, Jean Paul Mugabo (2024). A Methodological Evaluation and Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Public Health Surveillance System Adoption in Rwanda, 2000–2024. African Food Systems Research (Interdisciplinary - incl Agri/Env), Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18952346

Keywords

public health surveillanceRwandalow-resource settingsdifference-in-differencesmethodological evaluationhealth systems strengtheningSub-Saharan Africa

Research Snapshot

Desktop reading view
Language
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)
Current Journal
African Food Systems Research (Interdisciplinary - incl Agri/Env)

References