Vol. 1 No. 1 (2003)

View Issue TOC

Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Efficiency Gains

Nakato Nalwadda, National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18949145
Published: July 27, 2003

Abstract

{ "background": "Public health surveillance systems are critical for disease control, yet their methodological evaluation, particularly regarding efficiency, remains underdeveloped in many low-resource settings. There is a recognised need for robust quantitative frameworks to assess the impact of system enhancements.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to develop and apply a novel quasi-experimental framework to quantify efficiency gains from a nationwide digital integration intervention within Uganda's public health surveillance architecture.", "methodology": "We employed a difference-in-differences (DiD) design, analysing longitudinal, facility-level data from sentinel surveillance sites. The core model was specified as $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 \\text{Treat}i + \\beta2 \\text{Post}t + \\delta (\\text{Treat}i \\times \\text{Post}t) + \\epsilon_{it}$, where $\\delta$ captures the causal effect. Inference was based on cluster-robust standard errors at the district level.", "findings": "The digital integration intervention significantly reduced mean reporting latency by 4.2 days (95% CI: 2.8 to 5.6; p<0.001). This represented a 38% improvement relative to control facilities, which showed no statistically significant change over the same period.", "conclusion": "The applied DiD model provides a rigorous methodological proof-of-concept for evaluating surveillance system performance, demonstrating substantial and significant efficiency gains from digital integration.", "recommendations": "Policy makers should prioritise investment in integrated digital reporting infrastructures. Future evaluations of public health systems should adopt quasi-experimental designs to strengthen causal inference.", "key words": "surveillance evaluation, health systems, digital health, quasi-experimental design, causal inference, Sub-Saharan Africa", "contribution statement": "This paper provides the first application of a difference-in-differences framework to quantify the causal impact of a digital intervention on surveillance efficiency metrics in a low-resource setting, offering

Full Text:

Read the Full Article

The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.

How to Cite

Nakato Nalwadda (2003). Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Efficiency Gains. African Food Systems Research (Interdisciplinary - incl Agri/Env), Vol. 1 No. 1 (2003). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18949145

Keywords

Public health surveillanceUgandaEfficiencyDifference-in-differencesSub-Saharan AfricaHealth systems evaluationMethodology

Research Snapshot

Desktop reading view
Language
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2003)
Current Journal
African Food Systems Research (Interdisciplinary - incl Agri/Env)

References