Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Volume 1, Issue 1 (2021)
Peace Agreements as Political Texts: Performance, Interpretation, and the R-ARCSS Implementation Gap
African Peace
DO I
Evaluation Commission reports
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19678384
Published: April 21, 2026
Abstract
Peace Agreements as Political Texts: Performance, Interpretation, and the R-ARCSS Implementation Gap examines the persistent gap between negotiated commitments and lived political order, showing how this gap is produced as much by interpretation and performance as by technical incapacity. Centering South Sudan without treating it as exceptional, the study situates the case within broader debates in interpretive political science, sociolegal studies, and performative theory. It develops the concept of the performative peace text to explain how formal provisions, institutional design, and struggles over authority become fused during implementation.
Drawing on interpretive textual analysis of the CPA (2005), ARCSS (2015), and R-ARCSS (2018); implementation tracking through Joint Monitoring and Evaluation Commission reports; interviews with negotiators, mediators, and civil society monitors; and comparative analysis with the Arusha, Lomé, and Abuja agreements, the study advances three linked propositions. First, ambiguity in peace agreements functions as political design rather than technical flaw. Second, implementation unfolds as an interpretive struggle among competing actors. Third, participatory drafting reshapes the authority and contestability of peace texts.
The analysis addresses the central puzzle of how the R-ARCSS should be read as a political text, showing that its ambiguities, omissions, and contradictions reveal the underlying political settlement it encodes rather than the formal order it appears to establish. It treats institutions, narratives, and policy frameworks as political instruments rather than neutral containers.
The study concludes that reform efforts fail when they target implementation gaps without addressing the underlying distribution of power
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
African Peace, DO I, Evaluation Commission reports (2026). Peace Agreements as Political Texts: Performance, Interpretation, and the R-ARCSS Implementation Gap. African Peace and Conflict Studies (Broader - Interdisciplinary), Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Volume 1, Issue 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19678384
Keywords
s : Peace agreementsR-ARCSSinterpretive analysisimplementationpolitical textJMECSouth Sudan
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewLanguage
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Volume 1, Issue 1 (2021)
Current Journal
African Peace and Conflict Studies (Broader - Interdisciplinary)
References
- Mark Bevir (2003). Narrating the British state: an interpretive critique of New Labour's institutionalism. Review of International Political Economy, 10(3), 455-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290308428
- Bart Nooteboom; Irma Bogenrieder (2003). Change Of Routines: A Multi-Level Analysis. RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam). https://repub.eur.nl/pub/329
- Reva Siegel (1996). "The Rule of Love": Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy. The Yale Law Journal, 105(8), 2117-2117. https://doi.org/10.2307/797286
- Jane H. Hill (1998). Language, Race, and White Public Space. American Anthropologist, 100(3), 680-689. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.680
- Sven Beckert (2004). Emancipation and Empire: Reconstructing the Worldwide Web of Cotton Production in the Age of the American Civil War. The American Historical Review, 109(5), 1405-1438. https://doi.org/10.1086/530931
- Gyda Marås Sindre (2014). Internal party democracy in former rebel parties. Party Politics, 22(4), 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814550436
- Jana Hönke; Markus-Michael Müller (2012). Governing (in)security in a postcolonial world: Transnational entanglements and the worldliness of ‘local’ practice. Security Dialogue, 43(5), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612458337
- Pablo R. Castillo (2007). Rethinking Deterrence: The International Criminal Court in Sudan. Hispana, 167-184. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_unis.2007.n13.29144
- Unknown Author (2014). Appendix 1:. A Concise History of South Sudan, 351-353. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2tp742d.16
- Christopher Zambakari (2019). Peacemaking and Peace Agreements in South Sudan: An Introduction. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3405803
- International IDEA (2021). Defending Democracy: Annual Outcome Report 2020. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2021.44
- Nicholas Sambanis (2002). A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War. Defence and Peace Economics, 13(3), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690210976
- Daniel C. Fain; Jan Pedersen (2006). Sponsored search: A brief history. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 32(2), 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.1720320206
- Unknown Author (2015). 2015 Miracle Yearbook. https://doi.org/10.15385/yb.miracle.2015
- Katey Walter Anthony; Thomas Schneider von Deimling; Ingmar Nitze; Steve Frolking; A.M. Emond; R. P. Daanen; Peter Anthony; Prajna R Lindgren; Benjamin Jones; Guido Grosse (2018). 21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes. Nature Communications, 9(1), 3262-3262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05738-9