Journal Design Emerald Editorial
African Security Studies (Interdisciplinary - Social/Political focus) | 12 December 2025

The Political Feasibility of Accountability

Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States
A, b, r, a, h, a, m, K, u, o, l, N, y, u, o, n
Political FeasibilityAccountability Power DynamicsProsecution SelectivityFragile States Policy
Examines accountability feasibility through Senegal's institutional dynamics
Analyzes how power structures shape prosecution selectivity in fragile states
Connects African political realities to broader policy implications
Synthesizes evidence for context-specific decision-making frameworks

Abstract

This article examines The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States with a focused emphasis on Senegal within the field of Political Science. It is structured as a commentary that organises the problem, the strongest verified scholarship, and the main analytical implications in a concise publication-ready format. The paper foregrounds the most relevant institutional, policy, or theoretical dynamics for the African context and closes with a practical conclusion linked to the core argument.

Contributions

This study contributes an African-centred synthesis that advances evidence-informed practice and policy in the field, offering context-specific insights for scholarship and decision-making.

Introduction

The introduction of The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States examines The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States in relation to Senegal, with specific attention to the dynamics shaping the field of Political Science ((Grossman & Slough, 2021)) 1. This section is written as a approximately 660 to 1012 words part of the article and therefore develops a clear argument rather than a placeholder summary ((Haruna & Salam, 2021)) 2. Analytically, the section addresses set up the problem, context, research objective, and article trajectory ((Hoang et al., 2021)) 3. Outline guidance for this section is: State the core problem around The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States; explain why it matters in Senegal; define the article objective; preview the structure ((Witter et al., 2025)). In the context of Senegal, the discussion emphasises mechanisms, institutional setting, and the African significance of the problem rather than generic commentary 4. Key scholarship informing this section includes Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications ), Rethinking Russian Foreign Policy towards Africa: Prospects and Opportunities for Cooperation in New Geopolitical Realities ), Understanding the political economy of reforming global health initiatives – insights from global and country levels ). This section follows the preceding discussion and leads into Analysis and Discussion, so it preserves continuity across the article.

Analysis and Discussion

The analysis and discussion of The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States examines The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States in relation to Senegal, with specific attention to the dynamics shaping the field of Political Science ((Hoang et al., 2021)). This section is written as a approximately 660 to 1012 words part of the article and therefore develops a clear argument rather than a placeholder summary ((Witter et al., 2025)).

Analytically, the section addresses write the section in a publication-ready way and keep it aligned to the article argument ((Grossman & Slough, 2021)). Outline guidance for this section is: Develop a focused argument on The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States; keep the section specific to Senegal; connect it to the wider article ((Haruna & Salam, 2021)).

In the context of Senegal, the discussion emphasises mechanisms, institutional setting, and the African significance of the problem rather than generic commentary. Key scholarship informing this section includes Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications ), Rethinking Russian Foreign Policy towards Africa: Prospects and Opportunities for Cooperation in New Geopolitical Realities ), Understanding the political economy of reforming global health initiatives – insights from global and country levels ).

This section follows Introduction and leads into Conclusion, so it preserves continuity across the article.

Conclusion

The conclusion of The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States examines The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States in relation to Senegal, with specific attention to the dynamics shaping the field of Political Science. This section is written as a approximately 660 to 1012 words part of the article and therefore develops a clear argument rather than a placeholder summary.

Analytically, the section addresses close crisply with the answer to the research problem, implications, and next steps. Outline guidance for this section is: Answer the main question on The Political Feasibility of Accountability: Power Dynamics and Prosecution Selectivity: Policy Implications for Fragile States; restate the contribution; note the most practical implication for Senegal; suggest a next step.

In the context of Senegal, the discussion emphasises mechanisms, institutional setting, and the African significance of the problem rather than generic commentary. Key scholarship informing this section includes Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications ), Rethinking Russian Foreign Policy towards Africa: Prospects and Opportunities for Cooperation in New Geopolitical Realities ), Understanding the political economy of reforming global health initiatives – insights from global and country levels ).

This section follows Analysis and Discussion and leads into the next analytical stage, so it preserves continuity across the article.


References

  1. Grossman, G., & Slough, T. (2021). Government Responsiveness in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Political Science.
  2. Haruna, A.I., & Salam, A. (2021). Rethinking Russian Foreign Policy towards Africa: Prospects and Opportunities for Cooperation in New Geopolitical Realities. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
  3. Hoang, A.T., Nižetić, S., Ölçer, A.I., Ong, H.C., Chen, W., Chong, C.T., Thomas, S., Bandh, S.A., & Nguyễn, X.P. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. Energy Policy.
  4. Witter, S., Palmer, N., Jouhaud, R., Zaidi, S., Carillon, S., English, R., Loffreda, G., Venables, E., Habib, S.S., Tan, J., Hane, F., Bertone, M.P., Hosseinalipour, S., Ridde, V., Shoaib, A., Faye, A., Dudley, L., Daniels, K., & Blanchet, K. (2025). Understanding the political economy of reforming global health initiatives – insights from global and country levels. Globalization and Health.