Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)

View Issue TOC

Prioritization of Road Rehabilitation Investments in Post-Conflict South Sudan Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Aduot Madit Anhiem, UNICAF / Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; UniAthena / Guglielmo Marconi University, Rome, Italy ORCID 0009-0003-7755-1011
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19063453
Published: February 11, 2026

Abstract

South Sudan's post-conflict road rehabilitation agenda faces a fundamental challenge: a backlog of deteriorated road infrastructure vastly exceeding available funding, with no transparent or technically defensible framework for directing limited resources where they will generate the greatest national benefit. This paper presents a rigorous Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for criteria weighting and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for alternative ranking, applied to the prioritization of road rehabilitation investments across twelve candidate road segments in South Sudan. Seven evaluation criteria are identified and operationalized — pavement condition index, traffic volume, conflict exposure index, economic impact coefficient, population served, climate vulnerability score, and network connectivity index — and their relative weights are determined through a structured expert elicitation survey involving 34 civil engineering and transport planning experts. A decision matrix encompassing quantitative field data, remote-sensing indicators, and socio-economic survey outputs is constructed and processed through the TOPSIS algorithm to generate a closeness coefficient ranking. Results identify the Juba–Bor segment of National Highway N-8 (C_i = 0.831) as the highest-priority rehabilitation investment, followed by the Malakal–Renk Corridor (C_i = 0.794) and the Wau–Aweil Road (C_i = 0.762). A budget-constrained optimisation model using integer linear programming selects an optimal rehabilitation portfolio of six segments within a USD 75 million capital budget, yielding a combined TOPSIS benefit score of 4.411. Sensitivity analysis confirms the stability of the top-fou

Full Text:

Read the Full Article

The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.

How to Cite

Aduot Madit Anhiem (2026). Prioritization of Road Rehabilitation Investments in Post-Conflict South Sudan Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. African Journal of Applied Mathematics: Algorithms for Operations, Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19063453

Keywords

MCDAAHPTOPSISroad rehabilitationSouth Sudanpost-conflict infrastructureinvestment prioritization

Research Snapshot

Desktop reading view
Language
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Current Journal
African Journal of Applied Mathematics: Algorithms for Operations

References

  • ACLED — Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (2023) South Sudan Data Export 2000–2023. Available at: https://acleddata.com.
  • African Development Bank (2023) South Sudan Country Strategy Paper 2023–2027. Abidjan: AfDB Group.
  • Chen, T.Y., Chang, H.L. and Hung, L.Y. (2015) "A TOPSIS-based method for evaluating road maintenance projects." Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 43(2), pp. 389–401.
  • Christensen, A. and Harild, N. (2009) Forced Displacement: The Development Challenge. Washington DC: World Bank Social Development Department.
  • Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. (2004) "Greed and grievance in civil war." Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), pp. 563–595.
  • Coyne, C.J. (2007) After War: The Political Economy of Exporting Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Dyer, R.F. and Forman, E.H. (1992) "Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process." Decision Support Systems, 8(2), pp. 99–124.
  • Farhan, J. and Murray, A.T. (2008) "Siting park-and-ride facilities using a multi-objective spatial optimization model." Computers & Operations Research, 35(2), pp. 445–456.
  • Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Lichfield, N. (1969) "Evaluation methodology of urban and regional plans: A review." Regional Studies, 4(2), pp. 151–165.
  • Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K.M.D., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N. and Valipour, A. (2015) "Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications: A review of the literature." Economic Research, 28(1), pp. 516–571.
  • Mitchell, S., OSullivan, M. and Dunning, I. (2011) PuLP: A Linear Programming Toolkit for Python. Auckland: Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland.
  • MoRB — Ministry of Roads and Bridges, South Sudan (2022) South Sudan Road Condition Survey 2022: Summary Report. Juba: MoRB.
  • MoRB — Ministry of Roads and Bridges, South Sudan (2023) National Transport Master Plan 2023–2035: Final Report. Juba: MoRB.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • TRL — Transport Research Laboratory (2004) Overseas Road Note 9: A Design Manual for Small Roads. Crowthorne: TRL Limited.
  • Tsamboulas, D.A. (2007) "A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments." Transport Policy, 14(1), pp. 11–26.
  • UNOPS (2022) Infrastructure Unit Cost Database: East Africa Region 2022. Copenhagen: UNOPS.
  • Vickerman, R. (2007) "Cost-benefit analysis and large-scale infrastructure projects: State of the art and challenges." Environment and Planning B, 34(4), pp. 598–610.
  • World Bank (2022) South Sudan Infrastructure Sector Assessment 2022. Washington DC: World Bank Group.
  • World Bank (2023) South Sudan Transitional Development Assistance Framework 2025–2028: Road Sector Component. Washington DC: World Bank Group.
  • © 2025 African Journal of Applied Mathematics: Algorithms for Operations. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.XXXXX/ajama.2025.0913
  • Conversion notesMessage(type='warning', message='An unrecognised element was ignored: {http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/math}oMathPara')