Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026)
Aeroelastic Instability Analysis of Long-Span Bridges Under Turbulent Wind Conditions
Abstract
Long-span bridges—cable-stayed, suspension, and arch structures with main spans exceeding 300 m—are inherently susceptible to wind-induced aeroelastic instabilities, of which flutter, vortex-induced vibration (VIV), and torsional divergence represent the most structurally critical failure modes. The catastrophic collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940 established the definitive precedent for aeroelastic failure of bridge decks and initiated seven decades of research into the coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) phenomena governing bridge aerodynamics. This paper presents a comprehensive analytical and computational aeroelastic instability analysis framework for long-span bridges under turbulent wind, integrating Scanlan's flutter derivative theory, the quasi-steady buffeting theory of Davenport and Scanlan, stochastic simulation of turbulent wind fields using the spectral representation method, and a geometrically nonlinear time-domain finite element formulation for the bridge structural system. The framework is applied to a parametric study of bridges spanning 400–900 m, covering streamlined box girder, open truss, and plate girder deck cross-sections. The critical flutter wind speed U_F is determined by eigenvalue analysis of the state-space aeroelastic system incorporating frequency-dependent flutter derivatives H₁*–H₄* and A₁*–A₄* calibrated against wind tunnel measurements. Buffeting response is computed by random vibration analysis using the Davenport-Holmes buffeting force spectrum and frequency-domain mechanical admittance functions, with root mean square (RMS) and peak displacements evaluated at multiple wind return periods. A tuned mass damper (TMD) optimisation study demonstrates that a 2% mass ratio TMD reduces RMS buffeting displacement by 42–55%
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Keywords
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewReferences
- AASHTO (2020). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
- Bleich, F., McCullough, C. B., Rosecrans, R., & Vincent, G. S. (1950). The Mathematical Theory of Vibration in Suspension Bridges. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- Chen, X., & Kareem, A. (2002). Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 128(11), 1193–1205.
- Davenport, A. G. (1962). Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 88(ST3), 233–268.
- Den Hartog, J. P. (1947). Mechanical Vibrations, 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- EN 1991-1-4 (2010). Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures – Part 1-4: Wind Actions. European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), Brussels.
- Farquharson, F. B. (1949). Aerodynamic Stability of Suspension Bridges. Bulletin 116, University of Washington Engineering Experiment Station, Seattle.
- Frandsen, J. B. (2004). Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 89(1), 95–129.
- Holmes, J. D. (2015). Wind Loading of Structures, 3rd Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
- Kwon, S. D., & Park, K. S. (2004). Suppression of bridge flutter using tuned mass dampers based on robust performance design. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 92(11), 919–934.
- Larsen, A., & Walther, J. H. (1998). Discrete vortex simulation of flow around five generic brid