Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): Volume 1, Issue 4 (2026)
Vehicle–Bridge Interaction Dynamics: A Coupled Finite Element and Multibody Approach
Abstract
The dynamic interaction between moving vehicles and bridge structures represents one of the most complex coupled problems in structural engineering. This paper presents a comprehensive coupled finite element method (FEM) and multibody system (MBS) framework for analysing vehicle–bridge interaction (VBI) dynamics. The bridge is discretised using Euler–Bernoulli beam elements, while the vehicle is modelled as a multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) sprung mass system. Road surface roughness is generated stochastically using the ISO 8608 power spectral density (PSD) function, and the coupled equations of motion are integrated numerically using the Newmark-β time-stepping algorithm. The dynamic amplification factor (DAF), mid-span deflection, and internal stress responses are evaluated across a parametric range of vehicle speeds (20–140 km/h), axle loads (80–320 kN), and roughness classes (A–C). Results demonstrate that DAF increases nonlinearly with speed and roughness severity, reaching values up to 1.68 for Class C surfaces at 140 km/h, exceeding many current design code limits. A global sensitivity analysis using Sobol indices identifies vehicle speed and axle load as the dominant parameters governing bridge response. The study provides actionable guidance for bridge design codes and maintenance prioritisation, particularly in developing-nation infrastructure contexts.
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Keywords
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewReferences
- AASHTO (2020). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
- Cantero, D., Arvidsson, T., OBrien, E., & Karoumi, R. (2017). Influence of railway speed on the response of bridges. Engineering Structures, 152, 149–161.
- Cebon, D., & Newland, D. E. (1983). Artificial generation of road surface topography by the inverse FFT method. Vehicle System Dynamics, 12(1–3), 160–165.
- Chopra, A. K. (2012). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Deng, L., Yu, Y., Zou, Q., & Cai, C. S. (2015). State-of-the-art review of dynamic impact factors of highway bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 20(5), 04014080.
- EN 1991-2 (2003). Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures – Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges. European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), Brussels.
- Fryba, L. (1972). Vibration of Solids and Structures Under Moving Loads. Noordhoff International Publishing, Groningen.
- Fryba, L. (1999). Dynamics of Railway Bridges. Thomas Telford, London.
- Frýba, L., & Pirner, M. (2001). Load tests and modal analysis of bridges. Engineering Structures, 23(1), 102–109.
- Inglis, C. E. (1934). A Mathematical Treatise on Vibrations in Railway Bridges. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- ISO 8608 (2016). Mechanical Vibration – Road Surface Profiles – Reporting of Measured Data. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva.
- Jiang, L., Feng, Y., Zhou, W., & He, B. (2019). Vibration characteristic analysis of high-speed railway simply supported beam bridge–track structure system. Steel and Composite Structures, 31(6), 591–600.
- Kwon, H. C., & Kim, M. C. (2008). Effect of moving vehicle loads on the dynamic response of bridges considering road surface roughness. Engineering Structures, 30(3), 688–697.
- Liu, K., Reynders, E., De Roeck, G., & Lombaert, G. (2009). Experimental and numerical analysis of a composite bridge for high-speed trains. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 320(1–2), 201–220.
- Mulyanda, A., & Ngo, T. (2022). Dynamic amplification in bridges under overloaded freight vehicles in low-income country contexts. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 28(2), 04022006.
- Newmark, N. M. (1959). A method of computation for structural dynamics. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 85(3), 67–94.
- Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., & Tarantola, S. (2010). Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output: Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Computer Physics Communications, 181(2), 259–270.
- Timoshenko, S. (1922). On the forced vibrations of bridges. Philosophical Magazine, 43(257), 1018–1019.
- Yang, Y. B., & Lin, C. W. (1995). Vehicle-bridge interaction analysis by dynamic condensation method. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 121(11), 1636–1643.
- Yang, Y. B., & Yau, J. D. (1997). Vehicle-bridge interaction element for dynamic analysis. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(11), 1512–1518.
- Yang, Y. B., Yau, J. D., & Wu, Y. S. (2004). Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Dynamics: With Applications to High-Speed Railways. World Scientific, Singapore.
- Zhai, W., Han, Z., Chen, Z., Ling, L., & Zhu, S. (2019). Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: A state-of-the-art review. Vehicle System Dynamics, 57(7), 984–1027.
- Zhang, N., & Xia, H. (2013). Dynamic analysis of coupled vehicle–bridge system based on inter-system iteration method. Computers and Structures, 114, 26–34.