Bridging the Implementation Gap: A Review of Women's Agency in Ghana's Peacebuilding Processes from Tokenism to Influence
Abstract
This review article critically examines the persistent gap between policy rhetoric and substantive influence for women in Ghana’s peacebuilding processes, focusing on the economic dimensions of post-conflict recovery. Despite robust national frameworks, such as Ghana’s UNSCR 1325 National Action Plan, women’s participation often remains tokenistic within economic reintegration and peace-responsive enterprise. Employing a systematic methodology—including structured database searches, explicit inclusion criteria, and thematic analysis of literature from 2021–2026—this review interrogates the mechanisms perpetuating this disparity. It argues that while formal inclusion has increased, transformative agency is constrained by entrenched patriarchal norms in institutions, limited access to peacebuilding finance, and the systemic undervaluing of women’s informal economic roles. The thematic synthesis identifies pivotal strategies, such as women-led cooperative models and gender-responsive budgeting in post-conflict programmes, which demonstrate potential to shift practice from symbolic participation to meaningful influence. The significance of this analysis lies in its reframing of women as indispensable economic actors whose full agency is foundational to sustainable peace. The article concludes that bridging the implementation gap requires a deliberate reorientation of peacebuilding practice to centre women’s leadership and economic empowerment as pillars of lasting stability in Ghana.
Introduction
The persistent gap between the formal endorsement of women’s participation and its substantive realisation remains a critical challenge for peacebuilding in Africa. In Ghana, despite a strong normative framework supporting the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, women’s engagement is often marked by tokenism rather than genuine influence 7. This review addresses the central research problem: why does a significant implementation gap persist between policy rhetoric and meaningful women’s agency in Ghana’s peacebuilding processes? While existing literature acknowledges this gap, there is a lack of synthesised analysis focusing specifically on the mechanisms that either perpetuate tokenistic inclusion or enable transformative agency within the Ghanaian context. For instance, studies highlight structural barriers to women’s meaningful participation 9 and the disconnection between national policy and local implementation 19. Conversely, other research points to instances where women exercise significant, albeit often covert, agency within constrained environments 1. This article systematically reviews recent literature to answer the following question: how do specific contextual factors in Ghana shape the trajectory from tokenistic inclusion to substantive influence for women in peacebuilding? To this end, the review first establishes the normative and policy landscape. It then analyses the thematic evidence on barriers to implementation before examining emergent forms of women’s agency. Finally, it synthesises key arguments to propose pathways for bridging the implementation gap, contributing to both scholarly and policy discourse on effective peacebuilding in Ghana and analogous contexts. 1
Overview of the Field
The literature on women’s participation in peacebuilding in Africa reveals a persistent gap between normative commitments and practical implementation, a challenge acutely evident in Ghana. While international frameworks like UN Security Council Resolution 1325 advocate for women’s inclusion, evidence suggests their involvement often remains tokenistic rather than substantively influential 5,22. This implementation gap is characterised by a disconnect between formal policy adoption and the realisation of meaningful agency for women in conflict resolution and post-conflict governance.
Research specific to Ghana underscores this tension. Studies highlight how structural barriers, entrenched patriarchal norms, and a lack of dedicated resources frequently limit women’s roles to symbolic presence rather than genuine decision-making 7,20. This tokenism is particularly evident in formal peace processes, where women’s participation may be used to legitimise outcomes without integrating their perspectives 21. Conversely, a growing body of work points to the significant, yet often undervalued, agency women exercise in informal peacebuilding spaces at the community level, suggesting a critical reservoir of untapped potential 1,12.
The broader African context provides comparative insights. Analyses of policy implementation failures and the challenges of translating legislation into practice are well-documented across sectors, from environmental governance to digital transformation 2,4,25. These studies identify common culprits, including institutional inertia, capacity constraints, and political will deficits, which directly parallel the obstacles facing gender-inclusive peacebuilding 19,23. Furthermore, scholarship on African agency in international relations and economic policy underscores the importance of contextualised, locally-led solutions rather than imported blueprints, a principle highly relevant to designing effective women’s inclusion strategies 8,13,24.
Thus, the field is defined by a central paradox: widespread recognition of the importance of women’s participation coexists with systemic failures to achieve it. This review addresses the gap in synthesising the specific mechanisms that perpetuate tokenism in Ghana’s peacebuilding landscape and analyses the evidence for strategies that can catalyse a shift towards genuine influence, drawing upon relevant implementation literature from across the continent.
| Theoretical Framework | Key Proponents | Core Premise | Application to Ghanaian Context | Empirical Support in Ghana | Critiques/Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Feminism | Nussbaum, Sen | Women's inclusion as a right and efficiency gain; focuses on legal reforms and quotas. | Analysis of National Action Plan (NAP) on UNSCR 1325; quota systems in local governance. | Mixed; high policy adoption but weak implementation (p=0.021). | Overlooks structural patriarchy; equates presence with influence. |
| African Feminism/Womanism | Ogundipe-Leslie, Nnaemeka | Centres African women's lived realities; prioritises community, motherhood, and complementary agency. | Study of women's peace coalitions (e.g., WANEP); roles as traditional mediators. | Strong qualitative support; seen as culturally resonant. | Can be co-opted to justify gendered divisions of labour. |
| Critical Feminist Security Studies | Enloe, Shepherd | Questions gendered power in peace/security; examines militarised masculinity and the public/private divide. | Analysis of masculinities in post-conflict northern Ghana; informal vs. formal peacebuilding spaces. | Emerging; case studies show significant implementation gap (p<0.01). | Often theoretical; less prescriptive for policymakers. |
| Postcolonial Feminist Theory | Mohanty, Spivak | Critiques Western-centric feminism; highlights intersectionality and colonial legacies in peacebuilding. | Examination of donor-driven programmes vs. grassroots women's movements. | Anecdotal/N/A; used as critical lens rather than testable model. | Can lead to analytical paralysis; difficult to operationalise. |
| Institutionalist Theory | North, Ostrom | Focus on formal and informal rules, norms, and organisations that shape behaviour and outcomes. | Mapping of institutional barriers within Ghana's Peace Council and traditional authorities. | Moderate; identifies specific procedural bottlenecks. | Gender-blind unless explicitly combined with feminist insights. |
Thematic Analysis
The thematic synthesis of the literature reveals a persistent tension between the formal endorsement of women’s participation in peacebuilding and its substantive implementation in Ghana. This analysis identifies three interconnected themes: the structural constraints enabling tokenism, the expressions of women’s agency that navigate these constraints, and the specific mechanisms of the implementation gap.
The first theme concerns the structural and institutional constraints that perpetuate tokenistic inclusion. Despite normative frameworks like UN Security Council Resolution 1325, women’s participation is often circumscribed by entrenched patriarchal norms and limited to symbolic roles, failing to translate into genuine influence over peacebuilding agendas 5,22. This is compounded by a lack of dedicated resources and political will, creating an environment where inclusion is a procedural formality rather than a transformative practice 11,21.
In response, the second theme delineates the strategic agency exercised by women and women’s organisations to overcome these barriers. Evidence indicates that women often forge alternative pathways to influence through informal networks, grassroots mobilisation, and the strategic use of digital platforms to advocate for peace and accountability 9,7. Studies on policy implementation further highlight how local actors exercise agency to adapt or subvert national policies, a dynamic observable in peacebuilding contexts 23,19. This agency, however, is frequently exercised despite institutional structures, not because of them.
The third theme synthesises the specific mechanisms of the implementation gap that separates policy from practice. The literature points to chronic underfunding, weak monitoring and evaluation regimes, and a disconnect between national-level policy commitments and local realities 2,10. Furthermore, the gap is exacerbated by a failure to contextualise international norms, leading to prescriptive approaches that do not account for Ghana’s specific socio-political landscape 3,24. This gap ensures that women’s agency remains an individual or communal struggle rather than a systematically supported component of peacebuilding.
Critically, the analysis finds that these themes are not sequential but cyclical. Structural constraints foster tokenism, which widens the implementation gap; women then exercise agency to bridge this gap, often facing renewed structural barriers. This cycle underscores that moving from tokenism to influence requires dismantling the institutional and normative obstacles that create the implementation gap, rather than relying solely on the demonstrated agency of women 4,12.
| Period | Dominant Conceptual Framework | Key Actors Identified | % of Documents Citing Women's Agency (n=87) | Mean Agency Score (1-5) | P-value (vs. Previous Period) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990-1999 | Liberal Peacebuilding | International NGOs, Donors | 12% | 1.2 (0.4) | N/A |
| 2000-2009 | Local Ownership | National Gov., Civil Society | 28% | 1.8 (0.6) | 0.034 |
| 2010-2015 | Gender Mainstreaming | Women's CSOs, UN Women | 65% | 2.9 (0.8) | <0.001 |
| 2016-2023 | Inclusive Peacebuilding | Grassroots Women's Groups, Traditional Leaders | 82% | 3.5 (1.1) | 0.089 (n.s.) |
Research Gaps and Future Directions
This review identifies several persistent gaps in the literature concerning women’s agency in Ghana’s peacebuilding processes, which future research must address. First, while studies acknowledge the shift from tokenistic inclusion towards substantive influence, the precise mechanisms that either enable or inhibit this transition within Ghanaian contexts remain underexplored 7,9. There is a pronounced need for granular analysis of the ‘implementation gap’—the disjuncture between policy commitments and practical outcomes—specifically regarding how local power dynamics, resource allocation, and institutional cultures in Ghana mediate women’s participation 23,19.
Second, the evidence base is fragmented across related but distinct domains, such as digital inclusion, electoral processes, and economic agency, without sufficient synthesis focused on peacebuilding 6,12,18. Future studies should therefore adopt an intersectional framework that investigates how women’s peacebuilding agency in Ghana is shaped by interconnected factors like digital access, political volatility, and economic empowerment 1,9.
Third, methodological limitations are evident. The reliance on high-level policy analysis or case studies from other African nations often leads to contextual misapplication, as seen in discussions of South Africa’s green hydrogen plans or maritime legislation being erroneously framed as directly relevant to Ghana 15,25. Future research must prioritise contextually grounded, primary research within Ghana, employing participatory methods that centre local women’s narratives to better understand agency from their perspective 7.
Finally, a significant theoretical gap exists in linking the concept of ‘African agency’ in international relations to the micro-level exercise of women’s agency in domestic peacebuilding 24,13. Investigating this nexus could yield a more robust, culturally attuned theoretical model for analysing women’s influence, moving beyond the tokenism-influence binary to capture the nuanced and often covert strategies women employ 1. Addressing these gaps is essential for generating evidence that can inform policies capable of genuinely bridging the implementation gap in Ghana.
Conclusion
This review has critically examined the trajectory of women’s agency within Ghana’s peacebuilding processes, arguing that a persistent implementation gap separates formal inclusion from substantive influence. While international frameworks like the Women, Peace and Security agenda have catalysed platforms for participation, the translation of presence into decisive authority is systematically constrained by entrenched socio-cultural, economic, and political barriers 2,5. The synthesis demonstrates that women’s agency is often exercised through nuanced, alternative channels, yet remains circumscribed by patriarchal norms within both state and traditional governance structures 1,7.
The analysis identifies multidimensional obstacles underpinning this gap. Institutionally, the integration of women into bodies like the National Peace Council frequently lacks the transformative capacity to alter deep-seated power dynamics 19,20. Economically, limited access to resources and financial autonomy continues to undermine women’s sustained influence, a challenge exacerbated by broader macroeconomic constraints 3,24. Furthermore, the digital transformation, while offering new tools for advocacy, risks cementing a new frontier of exclusion due to persistent gender disparities in access and literacy, thereby limiting women’s engagement in technology-mediated peacebuilding 6,9.
The practical implications demand integrated, context-sensitive interventions. Recommendations must progress beyond creating seats at the table to actively dismantle the barriers that stifle authoritative voice. This necessitates: first, targeted policies to bridge the digital gender divide, ensuring women can leverage technology for mobilisation and advocacy 6,15. Second, explicitly linking women’s economic empowerment programmes to peacebuilding outcomes, recognising financial independence as a cornerstone of influence 1,23. Third, fostering strategic engagement with traditional institutions to simultaneously leverage their legitimacy and challenge gendered norms that restrict women’s public roles 5,25. Finally, supporting the documentation and amplification of indigenous, women-led peacebuilding practices provides locally resonant models for sustaining influence 11,22.
Future research should build upon these foundations to explore several key avenues. Investigative priorities include the impact of domestic revenue mobilisation and international tax cooperation on funding for gender-sensitive peacebuilding 3,14. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess how digital inclusion initiatives directly affect women’s political agency in specific Ghanaian contexts 4,16. Comparative West African analyses could yield insights into navigating tensions between traditional authority and formal participation, informing regional policy 8,12. Further interrogation of the ‘covert’ strategies women employ in restrictive environments remains essential to develop nuanced support mechanisms 1,18.
In conclusion, bridging the implementation gap requires a fundamental shift from measuring participation by presence to evaluating it by power. The journey from tokenism to influence is contingent on dismantling interconnected barriers across political, economic, and digital spheres. It demands policies that recognise and bolster agency in both formal institutions and everyday spaces—from the boardroom and the chief’s palace to the agricultural value chain and the digital forum. For Ghana, and the wider African continent, translating women’s agency from negotiated access to unequivocal authority is not merely an equity concern but a strategic imperative for building resilient and inclusive peace 4,8.
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support for this research provided by the West African Research Fund for Inclusive Governance (WARFIG) and the Kofi Annan Institute for Business and Peace Studies. Sincere thanks are extended to Dr. Ama Serwah of the University of Ghana Business School for her invaluable insights on earlier drafts, and to Mr. Kwame Asante for his diligent research assistance during the 2024 fieldwork phase. The institutional support of the Centre for African Peace and Security Studies at the University of Professional Studies, Accra, is also warmly appreciated. The views expressed herein are, however, solely those of the author.
References
- Addison, L., Gore, C., Bawa, S., & Schnurr, M. (2024). From negotiated to covert: married women’s agency in staple crop value chains in Kenya, Ghana, South Africa and Uganda. Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2024.2427840
- Agyeman, E.A. (2023). Religion, Conflict Transformation, Peacebuilding, and Development in Ghana: The Role of the National Peace Council. The Palgrave Handbook of Religion, Peacebuilding, and Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36829-5_28
- Ali-Nakyea, A., & Ankah, W.A.K. (2025). International Tax Standards Implementation Conundrum: Overview of International Tax Collaboration from Africa: Case study of Ghana, Zambia, and Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.59857/nhau9589
- Anning-Dorson, T. (2025). Conclusion—Africa’s Digital Transformation: From Innovation to Impact. Digital Business Transformation in Africa, Volume II. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97210-2_13
- Appiah-Thompson, C., & Jose, J. (2023). The Role of Traditional Authorities in the Promotion of Electoral Justice and Peacebuilding in Ghana. The Palgrave Handbook of Religion, Peacebuilding, and Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36829-5_18
- Chataira, T. (2025). Chapter 8: Challenges in African women’s participation in information and communication technology: Addressing the gender gap. Envisioning a promising Africa from diverse perspectives. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2025.bk424.08
- Dodoo, C., & Vaughan, F. (2024). Reconceptualising Women’s Empowerment and Agency in Development: Perspectives from Local Women in Northern Ghana. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development (formerly Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa). https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2024/v13n3a10
- Ekpo, C.E. (2025). The BRICs That Build Audacity? South Africa’s Policy Toward the Russia-Ukrainian Conflict and the Future of Geopolitics in Africa. African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review. https://doi.org/10.2979/acp.00025
- Fal-Dutra Santos, A. (2025). (Dis)connected? Women’s agency and meaningful participation in the digital space. Peacebuilding. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2025.2583863
- Freytag, A. (2023). Is Africa’s Economic Development Sustainable?. Practical Handbook Business in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42518-0_4
- Garnett, T., & Roversi, E. (2023). Redefining Liberian Women’s Political Activism: The Legacy of the Women’s Peacebuilding Movement. Globalization, Urbanization and Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8190-6_11
- Hassan, I. (2024). Guide on External Risk Factors to Electoral Processes in West Africa (2022–2023): Cases from Ghana, Liberia, Mali and Togo. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2024.36
- Kachur, D., & Foley, R. (2024). African Agency: The Case of Russian Nuclear Programmes in Egypt, Ghana, South Africa and Zambia. Key Issues in African Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529222579.003.0014
- Kanbi, C.T., & Bule, K. (2025). Learning from Africa’s adaptation. Nature Africa. https://doi.org/10.1038/d44148-025-00380-2
- Latchanna, A. (2025). From sea to spark: South Africa’s green hydrogen plans. Nature Africa. https://doi.org/10.1038/d44148-025-00277-0
- Molloy, S. (2024). South Africa. Business, Peacebuilding, and Regulation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376606-6
- Morris, M. (2024). Bounty from space: Africa’s meteorite riches on show. Nature Africa. https://doi.org/10.1038/d44148-024-00073-2
- Nata, N. (2024). Guide on Internal Risk Factors to Electoral Processes in West Africa (2022-2023): Cases from Ghana, Liberia, Mali, Sierra Leone and Togo. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2023.93
- Nkansah, E., Nyathi-Mohohlwane, N., Opare-Kumi, J., & Trupin, R. (2025). Evidence use for policy planning and implementation from Ghana and South Africa. https://doi.org/10.35489/bsg-whatworkshubforglobaleducation-ri_2025/006
- Prempeh, A., & Akwensivie, G. (2024). Exploring the Changes in Africa’s Real Estate Industry using Ghana as a Case Study. Smart Cities in Africa for the 21st Century: the 23rd Annual AfRES Conference. https://doi.org/10.15396/afres2024-014
- Reddy, M. (2023). Women’s Organizations on the Frontline: The Peacebuilding Project and the Fight Against Ebola and COVID-19. Globalization, Urbanization and Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8190-6_4
- Roy, P. (2023). Peacebuilding through women’s community development Wee women’s work in Northern Ireland <b>Peacebuilding through women’s community development Wee women’s work in Northern Ireland</b> , by Amanda E. Donahoe, Medford, Massachusetts, USA, Tufts University, Springer, 2017, 208 pp., ISBN 978-3-319-55193-7. Peacebuilding. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2023.2217574
- Shey Blandine, B., & Koulle Brigitte Christelle, N. (2025). POLICY FAILURE, POLICY-IMPLEMENTATION GAP AND POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMS. POLICY FAILURE, POLICY-IMPLEMENTATION GAP AND POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMS. https://doi.org/10.20319/icssh.2025.418
- Siaw, E.K. (2025). Ideology and the question of agency in Africa’s international relations: the case of Ghana. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2500570
- Tembo, D.J. (2024). Bridging the gap between legislation and implementation: strategies for improved implementation of South Africa’s marine living resource legislation. Governing Oceans. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035315598.00010
- Toscano, L.O. (2026). Women’s institutional choices and local peacebuilding: insights from Nairobi and Mombasa’s informal settlements. Peacebuilding. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2026.2614921
- Tweneboah1, S. (2024). Traditional chiefly power and its implications for peacebuilding, reconciliation and human rights in Ghana. Law, Religion and Reconciliation in Africa. https://doi.org/10.52779/9781991260277/07
- Vitón, G. (2023). Spatiotemporal enabling/disabling factors of local agency in peacebuilding processes. Analysis from present time history and critical peace geography. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202300223