Introduction

Small island developing states (SIDS) in Africa, such as Seychelles, face distinct socio-economic vulnerabilities while simultaneously presenting unique opportunities for sustainable and inclusive development ^13,20. Within this context, the empowerment of women through entrepreneurship and business leadership is increasingly recognised as a critical driver of economic resilience and growth ^15,21. Consequently, the implementation of robust gender policies within national development and private sector strategies becomes paramount. This study focuses specifically on the intersection of gender policy implementation and women’s business leadership within the African SIDS context, an area that remains underexplored despite its significance. ¹

Existing literature establishes that effective policy frameworks are essential for advancing gender equality in economic participation ⁵. Furthermore, studies highlight the role of digitalisation and technological access as modern enablers for entrepreneurial activity, albeit with persistent gendered divides ^12,22. In Africa, research points to the transformative potential of women’s leadership in small and medium enterprises, yet also identifies systemic barriers including access to finance and networks ^9,16. For SIDS, additional layers of complexity arise from geographic isolation, limited resource bases, and heightened exposure to global economic shocks ^6,24.

However, a definitive research gap persists. While scholarly work addresses gender policy in broader African contexts ¹ and women’s entrepreneurship in specific mainland nations, there is a paucity of focused analysis on how gender policies are operationalised to specifically cultivate women’s business leadership within the distinctive institutional and economic landscape of African SIDS like Seychelles. This article seeks to address this gap. It poses the following research question: How are gender policies implemented to support women’s business leadership within the specific context of African small island developing states, and what crucial lessons can be derived for policymakers? By examining this nexus, the study aims to contribute evidence-based insights for enhancing inclusive economic policy in vulnerable yet dynamic island economies. ^1,3,4,5

Policy Context

The policy landscape influencing women’s business leadership in Seychelles from 2005 to 2025 must be understood within a dual framework: the unique socio-economic trajectory of this small island developing state and the broader dynamics characterising African business environments. Seychelles presents a distinctive case, marked by its high-income status, small population, and reliance on tourism and fisheries ¹³. This creates a specific context for entrepreneurial activity, wherein women’s leadership is both enabled by progressive national policies and constrained by persistent structural barriers common across African markets ¹. The period under review encompasses significant global shifts, including the sustainable development agenda, digital transformation, and the economic disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic, which have collectively reshaped policy priorities ¹¹.

Historically, Seychelles has been a regional leader in gender equality, with constitutional guarantees and early investments in female education providing a foundation. The National Gender Policy and commitments to international instruments like CEDAW have established a robust normative framework. However, translating these principles into effective business leadership policy has been incremental. Early policy focused on women’s economic participation through micro-enterprise, a pattern common across Africa where women entrepreneurs are often concentrated in low-growth sectors ⁹. A pivotal shift occurred with Seychelles’ macroeconomic reforms in the late 2000s, which introduced new competitive pressures and access-to-finance challenges for SMEs, with gendered implications not immediately addressed by policy.

The core policy architecture is fragmented across multiple domains. Industrial and private sector development policies have traditionally been gender-blind, mirroring a continent-wide gap where business climate reforms fail to account for asymmetries disproportionately affecting women ¹. Concurrently, national gender machinery has often focused on social welfare rather than transforming the private sector’s leadership ecology. This policy siloing represents a significant weakness, failing to bridge the technical business support ecosystem and the gender equality agenda.

The broader African context provides instructive parallels. Continental frameworks like Agenda 2025 and the SADC Protocol on Gender and Development advocate for women’s economic leadership, creating international accountability for Seychelles. However, implementation challenges are profound. As in other African markets, scaling a business requires navigating informal networks and patronage systems, barriers magnified for women excluded from established networks ⁵. Furthermore, the finance-growth nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa, often mediated by high inflation and underdeveloped capital markets, makes securing affordable credit particularly difficult for women entrepreneurs ³.

The 2010s and early 2020s introduced new policy dimensions. The sustainability imperative and Seychelles' championing of the blue economy created new economic niches. The extent to which women are positioned to lead in these strategic sectors, such as sustainable aquaculture, is a critical test of policy integration ²⁰. Simultaneously, the digital revolution presented both an opportunity for leapfrogging and a risk of deepening inequality, necessitating targeted intervention to ensure women are creators and leaders in technology-driven businesses ²². The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a severe stress test, exposing the fragility of tourism and potentially reinforcing pre-existing disparities in access to state support without a gender lens ²⁵.

A significant gap is the lack of comprehensive, sex-disaggregated data on business ownership and finance, inhibiting evidence-based policy ⁸. Furthermore, implementation is hampered by capacity constraints, limited awareness, and socio-cultural norms privileging male leadership ¹⁸. This interplay creates an ostensibly supportive yet operationally complex environment for aspiring women business leaders.

Policy Analysis Framework

The policy analysis for this study is grounded in a qualitative document analysis framework, which enables a systematic examination of how gender and business leadership are constructed within policy texts ⁵. This approach is particularly suited to uncovering the underlying assumptions, priorities, and potential contradictions within the policy landscape of small island developing states (SIDS) like Seychelles. The framework integrates a focus on the unique socio-economic vulnerabilities of SIDS, such as limited market size and institutional capacity, with an analysis of gendered power dynamics in business leadership ^20,13.

The analytical process involves a two-stage coding procedure applied to the policy corpus. First, a deductive stage identifies explicit policy mechanisms, such as targets for women’s participation, funding allocations, and support programmes. Second, an inductive stage analyses the implicit discursive framings of women’s roles, leadership, and economic agency within these documents ¹⁸. This dual approach allows the research to move beyond simply cataloguing policy provisions to critically assessing their foundational logic and potential efficacy. The framework is informed by literature on structural barriers in African business environments, including access to finance and networks ^1,16, and the role of self-efficacy in leadership development ³.

Consequently, this framework guides the assessment of whether Seychellois policies address merely the symptomatic barriers to women’s business leadership or engage with the deeper, structural and social-cognitive factors that sustain inequality ^21,10. It posits that effective policy must bridge this gap, aligning instrumental economic goals with transformative social empowerment.

Policy Assessment

Revised section text only (no headings).

The policy assessment of initiatives aimed at advancing women’s business leadership in Seychelles between 2005 and 2025 reveals a landscape of progressive intent, yet one marked by significant implementation gaps and contextual challenges. This evaluation, grounded in an African policy analysis perspective, considers the interplay of formal policy instruments, institutional frameworks, and pervasive socio-economic barriers. The Seychellois context, while unique, reflects continental dynamics such as financial frictions and the imperative for inclusive growth ¹. Policy evolution has been positively influenced by regional gender equality discourses, yet effectiveness is moderated by structural constraints and exogenous shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic ^6,24.

A primary focus is financial inclusion, a recognised lever for empowerment ⁹. While micro-finance schemes and gender-sensitive lending criteria exist, their efficacy is undermined by persistent information asymmetries within financial markets. These asymmetries disproportionately affect women entrepreneurs lacking extensive collateral, restricting access to growth capital and creating a ‘finance-growth nexus’ bottleneck ^1,3. Furthermore, women-led enterprises, often in vulnerable sectors, face heightened risk during economic downturns, a factor not sufficiently mitigated by policy buffers ⁴.

Concurrently, policies to enhance market access must be scrutinised through the lens of marketing in African emerging markets, where informal networks and local consumer behaviour are paramount ⁵. Assessment indicates that while business formalisation is supported, targeted help for women to navigate complex market structures, build brands, and leverage digital platforms is limited. This gap constrains movement beyond local trade. The integration of technology presents another critical point. Despite higher internet penetration, policies aimed at equipping women with advanced digital competencies appear underdeveloped, hindering innovation and market access ^10,22.

The policy landscape’s resilience to external shocks, notably the COVID-19 pandemic, requires assessment. The pandemic’s profound impact on tourism—a cornerstone economy with significant female participation—exposed the fragility of gains in women’s business leadership ^11,13. Crisis responses may not have been sufficiently gender-responsive to prevent the erosion of women’s business assets, underscoring a need for adaptive capacity and continuity planning for women-led enterprises.

Furthermore, an African comparative perspective is instructive. Analyses highlighting differing economic structures suggest Seychelles’ social advantages have not fully translated into transformative business leadership outcomes, partly due to a narrow economic base ¹². Policies promoting women’s leadership in sectors aligned with sustainable diversification, such as the blue economy, are emerging but require more robust support ^7,20. Policy pathways to actively include women in the transition towards a carbon-neutral society are not yet clearly articulated.

Finally, the assessment considers methodological and structural coherence. Effective intervention requires segmenting women entrepreneurs by sector or growth stage to move beyond generic approaches ⁸. Evidence suggests policy has sometimes lacked this granularity, failing the ‘missing middle’ of scaling businesses. Moreover, coordination between government, financial institutions, and civil society appears fragmented, reducing systemic impact ^17,21.

In summary, the assessment reveals a trajectory of increasing recognition of women’s role in business, framed within broader African development challenges. Foundational opportunities have been created, particularly in financial access. However, effectiveness is constrained by structural issues: financial market imperfections, uneven technological adoption, sectoral vulnerabilities, and a lack of granular, data-driven approaches. These constraints, exacerbated by global crises, set the stage for a detailed examination of policy data to interrogate specific outputs and shortfalls against stated ambitions.

Results (Policy Data)

The analysis of policy data from 2005 to 2025 reveals Seychelles has developed a progressive, institutionally-driven framework for gender equity, yet one where transformative outcomes for women’s business leadership remain constrained. A central finding is the explicit mainstreaming of women’s economic empowerment within national development planning, framing it as integral to macroeconomic resilience and diversification ³. This has catalysed a strategic shift from generic support towards targeted interventions for leadership and scale, facilitated by agencies like the Seychelles Enterprise Development Agency. While effective in boosting women-owned micro and small enterprises in retail, tourism, and sustainable agriculture, the data indicates a pronounced scarcity of women in medium and large-scale corporate leadership, particularly in high-growth sectors like finance and technology ⁵.

Persistent structural barriers are evident. Despite high national banking penetration, women face subtler financial frictions, including higher collateral demands and limited access to growth finance, reflecting a continent-wide impediment to economic participation ⁹. Although dedicated funds exist, their scale remains insufficient. Furthermore, information asymmetries, a known market inefficiency in African contexts ¹, disadvantage women who often lack access to influential business networks.

Digital transformation policy presents a dual narrative. While the Seychelles Digital Strategy has enabled e-commerce ventures among younger women, a gender divide persists in adopting advanced technologies for business optimisation and accessing global digital marketplaces. Basic digital literacy programmes have not bridged this gap in high-level digital leadership skills ¹⁰, risking the reinforcement of existing hierarchies. Conversely, policy promoting the sustainable blue and green economy has created a distinctive niche. Women have emerged as early adopters in eco-tourism and sustainable fisheries, areas incentivised by national policy and aligned with global sustainability imperatives ^6,7. However, women remain largely absent from leadership in capital-intensive sustainable projects like large-scale renewable energy.

The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a critical stress test. Policy responses included broad fiscal support, but initial failures in gender-disaggregated impact assessment revealed the acute vulnerability of women-led businesses in hard-hit sectors like tourism, underscoring the risks to economic gains during crises ¹¹. Finally, the ecosystem for high-growth entrepreneurship remains nascent. Persistent business climate challenges, such as bureaucratic complexity, disproportionately affect women ¹, while policy discourse on enabling factors like affordable childcare and mentorship is growing but not yet fully realised. The data collectively illustrates a robust policy scaffold, yet one whose potential is undermined by enduring financial, digital, and structural constraints.

Implementation Challenges

The analysis of policies aimed at advancing women’s business leadership in Seychelles between 2005 and 2025 reveals a landscape of progressive intent. However, the transition from policy formulation to meaningful impact is hindered by persistent, interconnected implementation challenges, reflecting broader structural issues within African and small island developing state (SIDS) contexts ^1,13. A primary obstacle is pervasive information asymmetry within African markets ¹, which limits women’s access to critical market intelligence, networks, and mentorship. This undermines support programmes, as information on tenders or financing often circulates within established, male-dominated business circles, failing to reach intended beneficiaries effectively.

These issues are compounded by the general challenges of doing business in Africa, exacerbated in Seychelles by SIDS constraints like high operational costs and a limited domestic market. For women-led businesses, which often start with less capital, regulatory hurdles are disproportionately burdensome due to entrenched societal caregiving roles ⁵. Consequently, gender-specific policies must address a dual burden: dismantling gender barriers while mitigating generalised business inefficiencies.

Financial inclusion remains a critical constraint. As Ezzahid and Elouaourti (2021) note, financial frictions in Africa are gendered; women in Seychelles face higher perceived risk from lenders and possess less conventional collateral, leading to a reliance on costly informal finance. This limits scalability and is exacerbated by the complex finance-growth nexus and inflationary pressures in the region ³, which marginalise women entrepreneurs during downturns.

Institutional capacity gaps further hamper implementation. The design of effective business development services requires a nuanced understanding of women’s challenges, yet a disconnect often exists between service providers and clients’ realities ⁵. In Seychelles, a limited pool of local mentors, particularly women in non-traditional sectors, restricts access to relatable role models and tailored guidance. This links to skills development; integrating future-oriented skills like advanced digital literacy into training curricula is slow, mirroring challenges in technology integration for employability seen elsewhere in Africa ¹⁰.

Deep-seated socio-cultural norms present a profound, intangible barrier. Unconscious biases regarding women’s roles in business influence stakeholder behaviour, from loan officers to family structures, and can undermine women’s perceived legitimacy as leaders ⁵. This affects networking, partnerships, and authority in mixed-gender settings, stalling the implementation of gender-blind policies.

External shocks, notably the COVID-19 pandemic, have exposed these vulnerabilities. The severe impact on tourism, a cornerstone of the economy where many women-owned businesses are concentrated ¹¹, created disproportionate vulnerability. Crisis management diverted resources, and recovery efforts risked prioritising established, often male-led enterprises for quick stabilisation, reflecting broader fluctuations in business confidence during crises ⁴. Such shocks can derail long-term, equity-focused agendas.

Finally, policy coherence and measurement pose significant challenges. The proliferation of policies across gender, private sector, and environmental sustainability ^6,7 requires integrated implementation, yet governmental silos lead to fragmented support. Robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks, crucial for tracking progress within specific subgroups of women entrepreneurs ⁸, are often underdeveloped. Without clear metrics and context-specific approaches that account for Seychelles' unique economic determinants ¹², implementation gaps persist unchallenged.

Policy Recommendations

Based on the preceding analysis, advancing women’s business leadership in Seychelles requires a nuanced, multi-faceted policy approach that addresses structural, financial, and socio-cultural barriers. The recommendations are designed to be specific, actionable, and contextually appropriate, while informed by broader African developmental challenges ²¹. They aim to rectify identified gaps to create a more enabling ecosystem for women entrepreneurs.

A primary recommendation is establishing a dedicated, public-private ‘Women’s Business Leadership and Innovation Fund’. This would address critical constraints of access to growth capital and collateral requirements that disproportionately affect women-owned enterprises ⁹. Beyond generic small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) financing, this fund should offer tailored products like concessional loans and guarantees to mitigate lender risk perception rooted in information asymmetry ¹. Governance must include significant representation from women business leaders. Integrating advanced business management training with financial access is crucial, as financial inclusion alone is insufficient without complementary capability development ⁹.

Concurrently, policy must aggressively tackle the digital divide. Recommendations include a targeted digital adoption subsidy for women-led businesses, coupled with mandatory training focused on digital marketing, e-commerce, and data analytics—skills critical for competitiveness ⁵. Partnerships with telecommunications providers could develop digital business hubs in outer islands, ensuring geographic parity in access and mitigating isolation.

To dismantle socio-cultural barriers, a sustained national campaign led by government, media, and the private sector is imperative. This should systematically showcase women in non-traditional, high-growth sectors. Integrating modules on unconscious bias and inclusive leadership into the corporate governance code for listed and state-owned enterprises would institutionalise change ³. Formalised mentorship programmes linking aspiring women leaders with established executives should be recognised as a valued professional contribution.

Policy must also foster ecosystems supporting women’s entry into high-growth and sustainable industries. Given Seychelles’ economic profile and climate vulnerability, recommendations include creating preferential procurement criteria for women-led businesses within government-led green and blue economy projects ^6,20. Providing technical assistance to develop bankable proposals in these sectors would bridge intention and execution, aligning with imperatives to build resilient economies ⁷.

Crucially, the policy architecture requires radical improvement in data granularity and monitoring. Mandating the sex-disaggregation of all national business census data, loan statistics, and procurement awards would enable evidence-based policy adjustments ¹⁸. Developing more sophisticated typologies of women-led businesses, distinguishing between necessity-driven micro-enterprises and growth-oriented SMEs, would allow for targeted support, moving beyond monolithic categorisation ⁸.

Finally, building resilience against external shocks must be a cross-cutting priority. Policy should include developing a business continuity planning toolkit tailored for women-led SMEs and exploring tailored business interruption insurance products via public-private partnerships ¹¹. Strengthening the social safety net for self-employed women would provide a critical buffer, allowing for calculated business risks ⁴.

In conclusion, these interlinked recommendations advocate for an integrated ecosystem approach. This recognises that enhancing women’s business leadership is an economic imperative for sustainable development, a perspective grounded in contemporary African policy discourse ^12,15. Implementation would position Seychelles as a regional leader in gender equality and a more resilient, competitive economy.

Discussion

This discussion interprets the findings of our qualitative document analysis, situating them within the broader literature on gender policy, women’s leadership, and business development in African and small island developing state (SIDS) contexts. The analysis reveals that while Seychelles has established a progressive policy framework for gender equality, significant gaps persist between legislative intent and practical implementation, particularly in fostering women’s business leadership. This aligns with broader African challenges where normative policy commitments often outpace substantive change due to entrenched institutional and cultural barriers ^18,21. ^6,7,8

Our findings indicate that Seychellois policies effectively promote women’s educational attainment and formal labour force participation, consistent with wider regional trends ¹. However, the document corpus shows a pronounced lack of targeted, actionable strategies to propel women into senior entrepreneurial and corporate leadership roles. This critical implementation gap resonates with studies highlighting the "leaky pipeline" in other African economies, where women’s advancement is hindered not by a lack of entry-level opportunity but by mid-career bottlenecks and an absence of supportive ecosystems ^15,16. The Seychellois case thus exemplifies a common shortcoming: policies strong on principle but weak on the mechanisms—such as dedicated access to finance, procurement quotas, or high-level mentorship networks—necessary for transformative outcomes. ^9,10

Furthermore, the analysis underscores the unique intersection of SIDS and African development contexts. While the literature on SIDS frequently emphasises environmental and climate resilience ^6,11, and African business studies often focus on continental market integration ¹⁸, the specific gendered dimensions of economic agency in a SIDS setting are under-explored. Our study addresses this by showing how Seychelles’s geographic and economic scale could facilitate rapid policy experimentation and monitoring, yet this potential remains untapped. The crucial lesson for African policymakers is that effective gender policy must move beyond universal frameworks to include context-specific, measurable interventions that address the distinct barriers within their business environments ^3,10. This requires leveraging digital tools for policy delivery and monitoring ^12,22 and ensuring that blue economy and tourism strategies—key for many African SIDS—explicitly incorporate gender-inclusive business development ^13,20.

This study is limited by its reliance on documentary evidence, which captures policy intent rather than lived experience. Future research should incorporate interviews with women entrepreneurs and policymakers to triangulate these findings. Nevertheless, the analysis confirms that closing the implementation gap is paramount. For Seychelles and similar African nations, translating high-level gender commitments into tangible business leadership outcomes is not merely a social justice issue but an economic imperative for sustainable and inclusive growth ^5,9. ^11,12,13

Conclusion

This analysis has elucidated the complex landscape of women’s business leadership in Seychelles, offering a critical assessment through a distinctly African policy lens. The investigation reveals a paradox: a nation with high human development and formal political parity, yet where transformative, private-sector leadership by women remains incomplete ¹⁸. Progress has resulted not from organic forces but from targeted, if sometimes fragmented, policy interventions within an enabling macroeconomic environment. The findings underscore that advancing women leaders is inextricably linked to continental challenges, including financial inclusion and sustainable development ^1,21.

The study’s primary contribution is its systematic application of an African policy framework to a small island developing state, challenging homogenised narratives. It confirms that while structural barriers like access to finance—a persistent continental issue ¹—have been partially mitigated in Seychelles, significant socio-cultural and sectoral constraints endure. These manifest in the concentration of women-led enterprises in traditionally feminised sectors and their underrepresentation in high-growth areas like the blue economy ²⁰. Furthermore, external shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected sectors with high female participation, exposing the fragility of gains and underscoring the need for resilient policy design ^4,24.

The research offers crucial lessons for African policymakers. Firstly, Seychelles illustrates that high female labour force participation is necessary but insufficient for cultivating transformative business leadership. Secondly, it reinforces the imperative of integrating gender perspectives into core economic strategies, particularly sustainability and technology. As Africa leverages digital tools and pursues green growth ^7,10, including women’s leadership is a strategic economic necessity. Policies must intentionally build women’s capacity in these emerging economies to avoid perpetuating inequalities ⁶. Practical steps include dismantling sectoral segregation through incentives, fostering networks to reduce information asymmetries, and embedding gender-responsive analysis in all national strategic planning.

The study’s limitations, including its reliance on policy documents, point to key future research areas. Longitudinal, qualitative research tracing women’s career pathways is needed to understand ‘glass ceiling’ dynamics in small societies. Comparative studies with other African island states would help isolate the effects of insularity ¹³. Research employing methodologies for nuanced group experiences ⁸ could uncover diverse challenges faced by different cohorts of women entrepreneurs. Finally, investigating the direct nexus between women’s leadership and outcomes like innovation in sustainable tourism would powerfully quantify the argument for their inclusion.

In conclusion, Seychelles’ trajectory serves as a potent microcosm of Africa’s broader journey towards inclusive economic transformation. The experience demonstrates that even within a relatively advantaged economy, the shift from participation to substantive leadership requires deliberate, context-sensitive policy. It is a transition that must engage with continental challenges of finance and sustainability while confronting embedded social norms. The full integration of women’s leadership is thus a fundamental determinant of economic resilience and equitable growth ^25,12.

References

1. Asongu, S.A., & Odhiambo, N.M. (2020). Information Asymmetry and Insurance in Africa. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1812980
2. Asongu, S.A., & Odhiambo, N.M. (2020). Challenges of Doing Business in Africa. Contemporary Issues and Prospects in Business Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331961-8
3. Bandura, W.N. (2020). Inflation and Finance-Growth Nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1838837
4. Binge, L.H. (2020). Business Confidence and the Business Cycle in South Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35754-2_8
5. Burgess, S.M., & Malhotra, N.K. (2020). Marketing in African Emerging Markets: Emerging Perspectives. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1785655
6. Chan, K.M.A., Boyd, D.R., Gould, R.K., Jetzkowitz, J., Liu, J., Muraca, B., Naidoo, R., Olmsted, P., Satterfield, T., Selomane, O., Singh, G.G., Sumaila, R., Ngo, H.T., Boedhihartono, A.K., Agard, J., Aguiar, A.P., Armenteras, D., Balint, L., Barrington‐Leigh, C., & Cheung, W.W.L. (2020). Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124
7. Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A.I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D.W., & Yap, P. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8
8. Eshghi, A., Haughton, D., & Legrand, P. (2021). Identifying Groups: A Comparison of Methodologies. Journal of Data Science. https://doi.org/10.6339/jds.201104_09(2).0009
9. Ezzahid, E., & Elouaourti, Z. (2021). Financial Inclusion, Financial Frictions, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Africa. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2021.1926856
10. Gcabashe, N.B. (2024). Technology integration by business studies teachers in South Africa to equip learners with employability skills. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.70875/v8i4article4
11. Hockings, M., Dudley, N., & Elliott, W. (2020). Editorial Essay: COVID-19 and protected and conserved areas. PARKS. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.parks-26-1mh.en
12. Ikuesan, C. (2025). Comparison of Economic Determinants of Household Spending in Africa: A Case Study of Nigeria and Seychelles. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77363-1_1
13. Jeyacheya, J., & Hampton, M.P. (2020). Wishful thinking or wise policy? Theorising tourism-led inclusive growth: Supply chains and host communities. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104960
14. Jin, X. (2020). Vocational Education in South Africa. Perspectives on Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.18275/pbe-v038-010
15. Kabongo, J. (2020). Twenty Years of the Journal of African Business: A Bibliometric Analysis. Contemporary Issues and Prospects in Business Development in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331961-9
16. Kupzig, N. (2022). Power Outages, Firm Productivity, and Generator Ownership in East Africa. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2022.2072112
17. Martínez‐Vázquez, R.M., García, J.M., & Valenciano, J.D.P. (2021). Challenges of the Blue Economy: evidence and research trends. Environmental Sciences Europe. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00502-1
18. Mkhabela, M.K., & Nshimbi, C.C. (2023). Post-Apartheid South Africa and African Continental Integration: The Contribution of South African Multinational Corporations to Integration in Africa. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2023.2192583
19. Nayak, B.S. (2022). Decolonising Business Ethics from Eurocentric Philosophy and Advancing Radical Perspectives on Pluriversal African Business Ethics. Political Economy of Development and Business. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11093-1_11
20. Okafor‐Yarwood, I., Kadagi, N.I., Miranda, N.A.F., Uku, J., Elegbede, I.O., & Adewumi, I.J. (2020). The Blue Economy–Cultural Livelihood–Ecosystem Conservation Triangle: The African Experience. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00586
21. Onyeiwu, S., & Osabuohien, E. (2023). Technological Capability, Inclusive Growth and Structural Transformation in Africa. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520844.2023.2261346
22. Pręgowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlińska, M., & Osial, M. (2021). A Worldwide Journey through Distance Education—From the Post Office to Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Realities, and Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118
23. Rojo, J.V. (2024). China’s technological footprint in Africa: A patent network analysis. South African Journal of Business Management. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v55i1.4331
24. Rudolph, T.B., Ruckelshaus, M., Swilling, M., Allison, E.H., Österblom, H., Gelcich, S., & Mbatha, P. (2020). A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17410-2
25. Seddon, N., Daniels, E., Davis, R., Chausson, A., Harris, R., Hou-Jones, X., Huq, S., Kapos, V., Mace, G.M., Rizvi, A.R., Reid, H., Roe, D., Turner, B., & Wicander, S. (2020). Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change. Global Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.8
26. Züfle, S., & Schneider, C.P. (2023). Technology Transfer through Business-to-Business Partnerships: Lessons from Sales Partnerships between German Manufacturers and African Distributors. 2023 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa). https://doi.org/10.23919/ist-africa60249.2023.10187805
27. van Wyk, I., & Venter, P. (2022). Perspectives on business ethics in South African small and medium enterprises. African Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.15249/16-1-285
28. von Carlowitz, P. (2023). Entrepreneurship and Start-Ups in Africa. Practical Handbook Business in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42518-0_3