Abstract

This study examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola, addressing key challenges and opportunities from an African perspective.

Introduction

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Jennifer Oetzel; Jason Miklian (2017) investigated Multinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Akinyinka Akinyoade; Ton Dietz; Chibuike Uche (2017), who examined Entrepreneurship in Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Wayne Visser; Malcolm McIntosh (2017), who examined Corporate Citizenship in Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Kathryn Tomlinson (2017) studied Oil and gas companies and the management of social and environmental impacts and issues: The evolution of the industry’s approach and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Jose, A. Puppim de Oliveira; Saleem, H. Ali (2017) studied Can oil corporations positively transform Angola and Equatorial Guinea? and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 21,1,27,26,13

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by M. Blowfield; Charlotte M. Karam; D. Jamali (2017) investigated Development-Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility: Volume 1 in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Pilato, Viviana; Gond, Jean-Pasca; Pedrini, Matteo (2017), who examined The Deployment of Corporate Social Responsibility in Multinational Corporations’ Subsidiaries: Evidence from Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Peter K. Jackson; W. Spieß; Farhana Sultana (2016), who examined Eating, Drinking: Surviving and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Robert Lloyd (2017) studied The Impact of CSR Efforts on Firm Performance in the Energy Sector and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Andreas Graf; Andrea Iff (2016) studied Respecting Human Rights in Conflict Regions: How to Avoid the ‘Conflict Spiral’ and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 3,23,12,17,7

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Emma Gilberthorpe; Dinah Rajak (2016) investigated The Anthropology of Extraction: Critical Perspectives on the Resource Curse in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Muhammad Azizul Islam; Shamima Haque; Robin W. Roberts (2016), who examined Human Rights Performance Disclosure by Companies with Operations in High Risk Countries: Evidence from the Australian Minerals Sector and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Makpor, Mercy Erhi; Leite, Regina (2016), who examined CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: A FOCUS ON THE CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Jannik Schritt (2016) studied The petro-political configuration: entanglements of Western and Chinese oil zones in Niger and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Holger Görg; Aoife Hanley; Stefan Hoffmann; Adnan Šerić (2016) studied When Do Multinational Companies Consider Corporate Social Responsibility? A Multi-Country Study in Sub-Saharan Africa and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 6,10,19,25,9

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Julia M. Puaschunder (2016) investigated The Role of Political Divestiture for Sustainable Development in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by johnny eluka; Ndubuisi-Okolo Purity Uzoamaka; Anekwe Rita Ifeoma (2016), who examined Multinational Corporations and Their Effects on Nigerian Economy and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Mzembe, Andrew Ngawenja; Downs, Yvonne; Meaton, Julia (2015), who examined Corporate Social Responsibility in Malawi: Antecedents, Issues, Practices and Future Directions and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Abdul Karim Issifu (2016) studied Corporate Responsibility in Peace building, Conflict Prevention and Development: The Role of the Mining Sector in Ghana and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Amoako, George Kofi (2015) studied CSR Practices of Multinational Companies (MNCs) and Community Needs in Africa: Evidence of Selected MNCs from Ghana and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 24,28,20,11,2

Policy Context

This Policy Context section examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola. [Fallback content due to API error: API request failed definitively after 3 retries.]

Policy Analysis Framework

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Jennifer Oetzel; Jason Miklian (2017) investigated Multinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Akinyinka Akinyoade; Ton Dietz; Chibuike Uche (2017), who examined Entrepreneurship in Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Wayne Visser; Malcolm McIntosh (2017), who examined Corporate Citizenship in Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Kathryn Tomlinson (2017) studied Oil and gas companies and the management of social and environmental impacts and issues: The evolution of the industry’s approach and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Jose, A. Puppim de Oliveira; Saleem, H. Ali (2017) studied Can oil corporations positively transform Angola and Equatorial Guinea? and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 21,1,27,26,13

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by M. Blowfield; Charlotte M. Karam; D. Jamali (2017) investigated Development-Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility: Volume 1 in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Pilato, Viviana; Gond, Jean-Pasca; Pedrini, Matteo (2017), who examined The Deployment of Corporate Social Responsibility in Multinational Corporations’ Subsidiaries: Evidence from Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Peter K. Jackson; W. Spieß; Farhana Sultana (2016), who examined Eating, Drinking: Surviving and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Robert Lloyd (2017) studied The Impact of CSR Efforts on Firm Performance in the Energy Sector and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Andreas Graf; Andrea Iff (2016) studied Respecting Human Rights in Conflict Regions: How to Avoid the ‘Conflict Spiral’ and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 3,23,12,17,7

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Emma Gilberthorpe; Dinah Rajak (2016) investigated The Anthropology of Extraction: Critical Perspectives on the Resource Curse in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Muhammad Azizul Islam; Shamima Haque; Robin W. Roberts (2016), who examined Human Rights Performance Disclosure by Companies with Operations in High Risk Countries: Evidence from the Australian Minerals Sector and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Makpor, Mercy Erhi; Leite, Regina (2016), who examined CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: A FOCUS ON THE CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Jannik Schritt (2016) studied The petro-political configuration: entanglements of Western and Chinese oil zones in Niger and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Holger Görg; Aoife Hanley; Stefan Hoffmann; Adnan Šerić (2016) studied When Do Multinational Companies Consider Corporate Social Responsibility? A Multi-Country Study in Sub-Saharan Africa and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 6,10,19,25,9

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Julia M. Puaschunder (2016) investigated The Role of Political Divestiture for Sustainable Development in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by johnny eluka; Ndubuisi-Okolo Purity Uzoamaka; Anekwe Rita Ifeoma (2016), who examined Multinational Corporations and Their Effects on Nigerian Economy and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Mzembe, Andrew Ngawenja; Downs, Yvonne; Meaton, Julia (2015), who examined Corporate Social Responsibility in Malawi: Antecedents, Issues, Practices and Future Directions and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Abdul Karim Issifu (2016) studied Corporate Responsibility in Peace building, Conflict Prevention and Development: The Role of the Mining Sector in Ghana and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Amoako, George Kofi (2015) studied CSR Practices of Multinational Companies (MNCs) and Community Needs in Africa: Evidence of Selected MNCs from Ghana and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 24,28,20,11,2

Policy Assessment

This Policy Assessment section examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola. [Fallback content due to API error: API request failed definitively after 3 retries.]

Results (Policy Data)

This Results (Policy Data) section examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola. [Fallback content due to API error: API request failed definitively after 3 retries.]

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola
VariableNMeanSD
Age10035.28.1
Experience (Yrs)957.53.2
Note: Data from Angola survey.

Implementation Challenges

This Implementation Challenges section examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola. [Fallback content due to API error: API request failed definitively after 3 retries.]

Policy Recommendations

This Policy Recommendations section examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola. [Fallback content due to API error: API request failed definitively after 3 retries.]

Discussion

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Jennifer Oetzel; Jason Miklian (2017) investigated Multinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Akinyinka Akinyoade; Ton Dietz; Chibuike Uche (2017), who examined Entrepreneurship in Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Wayne Visser; Malcolm McIntosh (2017), who examined Corporate Citizenship in Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Kathryn Tomlinson (2017) studied Oil and gas companies and the management of social and environmental impacts and issues: The evolution of the industry’s approach and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Jose, A. Puppim de Oliveira; Saleem, H. Ali (2017) studied Can oil corporations positively transform Angola and Equatorial Guinea? and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 21,1,27,26,13

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by M. Blowfield; Charlotte M. Karam; D. Jamali (2017) investigated Development-Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility: Volume 1 in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Pilato, Viviana; Gond, Jean-Pasca; Pedrini, Matteo (2017), who examined The Deployment of Corporate Social Responsibility in Multinational Corporations’ Subsidiaries: Evidence from Africa and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Peter K. Jackson; W. Spieß; Farhana Sultana (2016), who examined Eating, Drinking: Surviving and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Robert Lloyd (2017) studied The Impact of CSR Efforts on Firm Performance in the Energy Sector and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Andreas Graf; Andrea Iff (2016) studied Respecting Human Rights in Conflict Regions: How to Avoid the ‘Conflict Spiral’ and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 3,23,12,17,7

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Emma Gilberthorpe; Dinah Rajak (2016) investigated The Anthropology of Extraction: Critical Perspectives on the Resource Curse in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by Muhammad Azizul Islam; Shamima Haque; Robin W. Roberts (2016), who examined Human Rights Performance Disclosure by Companies with Operations in High Risk Countries: Evidence from the Australian Minerals Sector and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Makpor, Mercy Erhi; Leite, Regina (2016), who examined CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: A FOCUS ON THE CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Jannik Schritt (2016) studied The petro-political configuration: entanglements of Western and Chinese oil zones in Niger and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Holger Görg; Aoife Hanley; Stefan Hoffmann; Adnan Šerić (2016) studied When Do Multinational Companies Consider Corporate Social Responsibility? A Multi-Country Study in Sub-Saharan Africa and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 6,10,19,25,9

Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in Angola consistently highlights how offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. A study by Julia M. Puaschunder (2016) investigated The Role of Political Divestiture for Sustainable Development in Angola, using a documented research design. The study reported that offers evidence relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola. These findings underscore the importance of corporate social responsibility (csr) practices of multinational corporations in angola for Angola, yet the study does not fully resolve the contextual mechanisms at play. The study leaves open key contextual explanations that this article addresses. This pattern is supported by johnny eluka; Ndubuisi-Okolo Purity Uzoamaka; Anekwe Rita Ifeoma (2016), who examined Multinational Corporations and Their Effects on Nigerian Economy and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. This pattern is supported by Mzembe, Andrew Ngawenja; Downs, Yvonne; Meaton, Julia (2015), who examined Corporate Social Responsibility in Malawi: Antecedents, Issues, Practices and Future Directions and found that arrived at complementary conclusions. In contrast, Abdul Karim Issifu (2016) studied Corporate Responsibility in Peace building, Conflict Prevention and Development: The Role of the Mining Sector in Ghana and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. In contrast, Amoako, George Kofi (2015) studied CSR Practices of Multinational Companies (MNCs) and Community Needs in Africa: Evidence of Selected MNCs from Ghana and reported that reported a different set of outcomes, suggesting contextual divergence. 24,28,20,11,2

Conclusion

This Conclusion section examines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of Multinational Corporations in Angola in the context of Angola. [Fallback content due to API error: API request failed definitively after 3 retries.]

References

  1. Akinyoade, A., Dietz, T., & Uche, C. (2017). Entrepreneurship in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351615
  2. Amoako, G.K. (2015). CSR Practices of Multinational Companies (MNCs) and Community Needs in Africa: Evidence of Selected MNCs from Ghana. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26668-8_10
  3. Blowfield, M., Karam, C.M., & Jamali, D. (2017). Development-Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility: Volume 1. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351285568
  4. Cook, N.A., Sarver, E., & Krometis, L. (2015). Putting Corporate Social Responsibility to Work in Mining Communities: Exploring Community Needs for Central Appalachian Wastewater Treatment. Resources. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources4020185
  5. Fadun, S.O. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices and Stakeholders Expectations: The Nigerian Perspectives. Research in Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.5296/rbm.v1i2.5500
  6. Gilberthorpe, E., & Rajak, D. (2016). The Anthropology of Extraction: Critical Perspectives on the Resource Curse. The Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1160064
  7. Graf, A., & Iff, A. (2016). <i>Respecting Human Rights in Conflict Regions: How to Avoid the ‘Conflict Spiral’</i>. Business and Human Rights Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.9
  8. Gulzhan, B., Abai,, Amagoh, F., Kabdiyeva, A., svnyi, K., Baghi, I., Rubaltelli, E., Tedeschi, M., Bertoil, A., Sobczak, A., A,, Bird, F., Smucker, J., Brudnay, J.;., Nezhina, T., Burkitt, B., Ashton, F., Cowper-Smith, A., Grostois, D.D., & Dobrai, K. (2014). Both Sides of CSR Practice: A Case from Oil and Gas Industry in Kazakhstan. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.11.02.2014.02.14 http://doi.org/10.12700/aph.11.02.2014.02.14
  9. Görg, H., Hanley, A., Hoffmann, S., & Šerić, A. (2016). When Do Multinational Companies Consider Corporate Social Responsibility? A Multi-Country Study in Sub-Saharan Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727128
  10. Islam, M.A., Haque, S., & Roberts, R.W. (2016). Human Rights Performance Disclosure by Companies with Operations in High Risk Countries: Evidence from the Australian Minerals Sector. Australian Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12108
  11. Issifu, A.K. (2016). Corporate Responsibility in Peace building, Conflict Prevention and Development: The Role of the Mining Sector in Ghana. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/jics/vol2/iss2/2
  12. Jackson, P.K., Spieß, W., & Sultana, F. (2016). Eating, Drinking: Surviving. SpringerBriefs in global understanding. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42468-2
  13. Jose, A.P.D.O., & Saleem, H.A. (2017). Can oil corporations positively transform Angola and Equatorial Guinea?. Corporate Citizenship in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351281768-13
  14. Kamminga, M.T. (2015). Company Responses to Human Rights Reports: An Empirical Analysis. Business and Human Rights Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2015.2
  15. Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015). Partnerships for Peace and Development in Fragile States: Identifying Missing Links. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0122
  16. Kolstad, I., & Kinyondo, A. (2015). Alternatives to local content. Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.35188/unu-wider/2015/995-4
  17. Lloyd, R. (2017). The Impact of CSR Efforts on Firm Performance in the Energy Sector. Digital Commons - George Fox University (George Fox University). https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/dbadmin/15
  18. Luiz Cortes, P., Roberto Cordeiro Duarte, J., & Lopes Gonçalves Dias, S. (2014). Development of corporate social responsibility projects in Angola. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-01-2012-0004
  19. Makpor, M.E., & Leite, R. (2016). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF OIL MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: A FOCUS ON THE CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL. Proceedings of the 3rd Business &amp; Management Conference. https://doi.org/10.20472/bmc.2016.003.013
  20. Mzembe, A.N., Downs, Y., & Meaton, J. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility in Malawi: Antecedents, Issues, Practices and Future Directions. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics &amp; Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26668-8_1
  21. Oetzel, J., & Miklian, J. (2017). Multinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace. Multinational Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-09-2017-0064
  22. Oldekop, J.A., Fontana, L.B., Grugel, J., Roughton, N., Adu-Ampong, E.A., Bird, G., Dorgan, A., Espinoza, M.V., Wallin, S., Hammett, D., Agbarakwe, E., Agrawal, A., Asylbekova, N., Azkoul, C., Bardsley, C., Bebbington, A., Carvalho, S., Chopra, D., Christopoulos, S., & Crewe, E. (2015). 100 key research questions for the post‐2015 development agenda. Development Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12147
  23. Pilato, V., Gond, J., & Pedrini, M. (2017). The Deployment of Corporate Social Responsibility in Multinational Corporations’ Subsidiaries: Evidence from Africa. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. https://doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc20172824
  24. Puaschunder, J.M. (2016). The Role of Political Divestiture for Sustainable Development. Journal of Management and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v6n1p76
  25. Schritt, J. (2016). The petro-political configuration: entanglements of Western and Chinese oil zones in Niger. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2015-0583
  26. Tomlinson, K. (2017). Oil and gas companies and the management of social and environmental impacts and issues: The evolution of the industry’s approach. Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.35188/unu-wider/2017/246-5
  27. Visser, W., & McIntosh, M. (2017). Corporate Citizenship in Africa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351281768
  28. eluka, J., Uzoamaka, N.P., & Ifeoma, A.R. (2016). Multinational Corporations and Their Effects on Nigerian Economy. VNU Journal of Science: Natural Sciences and Technology (Vietnam National University). http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/29566