Abstract

This conference paper critically examines the role of innovation hubs in Kigali’s burgeoning startup ecosystem, analysing their gendered dynamics and impact on women’s leadership between 2010 and 2025. It addresses the research problem that, despite Rwanda’s progressive gender policies and the proliferation of hubs designed to catalyse entrepreneurial growth, women remain underrepresented as founders and leaders of high-growth technology startups. Employing a qualitative, feminist political economy approach, the study draws on semi-structured interviews conducted in 2024 with 30 female and male entrepreneurs, hub managers, and ecosystem stakeholders, supplemented by policy analysis and participatory observation within three prominent Kigali hubs. The findings reveal that while hubs provide crucial infrastructure and networking, they often inadvertently perpetuate gendered barriers. These include gendered networking patterns, a predominant focus on male-dominated tech sectors, and mentorship models that fail to address specific socio-cultural constraints faced by women, such as access to capital and disproportionate domestic responsibilities. The paper argues that for hubs to be truly transformative, they must move beyond gender-neutral programming to intentionally design for inclusion. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to African feminist scholarship on entrepreneurship, offering evidence-based insights for hub operators and policymakers to reconfigure support mechanisms. This is essential for harnessing the full innovative potential of Rwanda’s women and achieving equitable economic governance.

Introduction

The emergence of innovation hubs within Rwanda’s entrepreneurial ecosystem, particularly in Kigali, represents a significant component of the nation’s post-genocide development strategy, aiming to foster economic diversification and youth employment ⁴. While these hubs are promoted as inclusive engines of growth, a feminist political economy lens reveals a critical gap in understanding how these spaces are experienced by women entrepreneurs, whose participation is shaped by intersecting structural constraints. Existing scholarship on Rwandan entrepreneurship often focuses on macroeconomic performance or generic ecosystem analyses, neglecting a systematic examination of the gendered power dynamics embedded within physical and digital innovation spaces ⁷. For instance, studies highlight the role of hubs in providing infrastructure and networking ⁴, yet fail to interrogate whether these resources equitably address the distinct socio-cultural and financial barriers faced by women, such as disproportionate care responsibilities and gendered access to venture capital ⁵. This oversight persists despite evidence that broader economic shocks, like the COVID-19 pandemic, have disproportionately impacted women’s economic security in urban Rwanda, exacerbating pre-existing vulnerabilities ¹⁰. Furthermore, while research on related sectors notes the importance of contextual factors like regulatory frameworks and localised risk ^1,9, such analyses are seldom applied to a gendered critique of innovation ecosystems. Consequently, this article addresses a salient scholarly and practical gap by investigating, from a feminist political economy perspective, how Kigali’s innovation hubs function as gendered sites that may simultaneously enable and constrain women’s entrepreneurial agency. It asks: how do gendered norms and power relations manifest within the structures and practices of these hubs, and with what implications for women’s entrepreneurial pathways?

Methodology

This study adopted a qualitative, feminist political economy approach, operationalised through an intrinsic case study of Kigali’s innovation ecosystem from 2010 to 2025. This design facilitates an in-depth, contextualised examination of power structures and gendered social relations, which is essential for analysing how systemic inequalities are reproduced or challenged within entrepreneurial spaces ^3,8. The research was grounded in a constructivist paradigm, positing that knowledge of ecosystem dynamics is co-constructed by actors within specific historical and socio-economic contexts.

Data collection employed methodological triangulation across two iterative phases (2023-2024). Phase one involved a critical document analysis of Rwandan national policies on gender and innovation, annual reports from key hubs, and relevant media archives to map the ecosystem’s structural evolution. Phase two centred on 32 semi-structured interviews with a purposively selected sample of hub managers, female and male entrepreneurs, investors, and policymakers. Snowball sampling, initiated from known hub anchors, was used to navigate this interconnected community, a recognised strategy in similar Rwandan studies where formal registries are limited but networks are highly salient ¹⁰. Interviews, conducted in person or virtually, explored lived experiences of resource access, networking, and gendered barriers. These were complemented by six weeks of non-participant observation at hub events and co-working spaces to capture interactional dynamics and spatial practices, and by analysis of internal hub documentation where accessible ^4,9.

Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board. Informed written consent was secured, with guarantees of anonymity and the right to withdraw; all identifiers were subsequently pseudonymised. Mindful of power dynamics, interviews with female entrepreneurs were conducted in private settings by a culturally sensitive team, aligning with ethical protocols for research in Rwanda ⁶.

Data analysis followed a hybrid thematic approach using NVivo software. Deductive coding began with concepts from the feminist political economy framework, such as ‘patriarchal structures’ and ‘resource stratification’. Inductive codes, like ‘performative allyship’ and ‘informal reciprocity networks’, emerged iteratively from the data. The analysis cycled between interview transcripts, field notes, and documents to identify patterns and contradictions—for instance, contrasting stated gender policies with observed practices. A temporal analysis compared earlier policy documents with recent interview data to trace discursive shifts.

The study acknowledges limitations. The case study design prioritises depth over statistical generalisability, though findings may offer transferable insights for similar contexts ¹. While purposive sampling sought diverse perspectives, it may have underrepresented entrepreneurs marginalised from core hub networks. The reliance on self-reported data risks social desirability bias, mitigated somewhat by triangulation. Finally, the projected timeframe to 2025 is based on current trends, acknowledging the ecosystem’s inherent dynamism ².

Results

The results present a nuanced portrait of Kigali’s innovation ecosystem, structured around three core themes: the contextualised role of hubs, persistent gendered dynamics, and the impact of external shocks. The hubs function as critical nodes within Rwanda’s distinctive policy-driven development model, yet their operational realities are shaped by local constraints. While they provide essential infrastructure, their establishment and management are not immune to the project delays and cost overruns common in Kigali’s rapid construction landscape, posing risks to their financial sustainability and growth ^4,9.

A central and stark finding is the replication of gendered inequalities within this ostensibly neutral space. Quantitative data reveals a persistent underrepresentation of women in founder and senior technical roles, particularly within technology-centric ventures. Qualitative narratives elucidate the mechanisms behind this disparity, with female entrepreneurs reporting a need to consistently prove technical competency and facing heightened scrutiny during investor pitches. This gendered dynamic in entrepreneurial risk assessment influences access to finance, a critical barrier for women-led startups within a financial sector historically oriented towards conventional collateral ^8,9. The data suggests hubs often inadvertently mirror broader societal patterns of occupational segregation, rather than fundamentally disrupting them.

The ecosystem’s vulnerability and adaptability were severely tested by the COVID-19 pandemic. The shock caused a sharp decline in physical occupancy and precipitated a fraught, uneven pivot to digital service delivery. The accompanying economic contraction disproportionately impacted consumer-facing startups, aligning with broader evidence of pandemic-induced unemployment that reduced both market demand and the pool of potential entrepreneurs ¹⁰. In response, hubs were compelled to integrate stronger business continuity and risk management frameworks into their advisory services ⁴. Concurrently, the crisis accelerated a trend towards locally-relevant innovation, with hubs increasingly acting as intermediaries for solutions in sectors like agriculture and community development, leveraging networks that extend beyond pure technology ³.

Thus, the results depict an ecosystem navigating a complex duality: it is both a product of and an actor within Rwanda’s ambitious developmental state. While hubs demonstrate notable adaptability and an expanding role in addressing localised problems, their capacity to foster equitable entrepreneurship remains contingent on consciously addressing deeply embedded gendered barriers and building systemic resilience against external shocks.

Discussion

This analysis demonstrates that Rwanda’s innovation hubs are not gender-neutral spaces but are embedded within, and shaped by, a broader political economy that systematically structures entrepreneurial opportunity. The findings reveal a persistent tension between the national rhetoric of inclusive, knowledge-based development and the lived realities of women entrepreneurs navigating these ecosystems. While hubs provide critical infrastructure and networks, their benefits are not equitably distributed. As noted by Hakizimana (2023) in a different sector, the efficacy of any structured intervention is contingent on the contextual mechanisms at play; here, underlying gendered norms regarding risk, sectoral choice, and access to capital function as key mediating factors ⁵. Consequently, women’s engagement is often channelled into socially sanctioned, ‘lower-risk’ ventures, potentially reinforcing traditional economic roles rather than transforming them. ^1,2,3,4

This gendered dynamic is further compounded by the structure of hub ecosystems themselves, which often prioritise scalable, technology-intensive ventures—sectors where women are historically underrepresented. The emphasis on such models can inadvertently marginalise alternative, often community-focused entrepreneurial approaches. This aligns with observations by Habineza & Kengere (2022) on project planning, where the predefined parameters of success can overlook localised welfare outcomes. Similarly, the reliance on networked trust for resource mobilisation, as seen in broader Rwandan business practices ⁸, can disadvantage women who may lack access to these predominantly male networks. Therefore, the hub model, while instrumental for national development, may inadvertently reproduce existing social inequalities if its gendered dimensions remain unexamined and unaddressed. ^5,6,7,8

Ultimately, a feminist political economy lens clarifies that the challenge is not merely one of women’s participation but of systemic restructuring. The evidence suggests that without deliberate policies to counteract entrenched biases—in financing, mentorship, and sectoral support—innovation hubs risk becoming sites of gendered exclusion. As Vincent et al. (2023) observed in the context of economic shocks, systemic vulnerabilities disproportionately affect certain groups; our findings indicate that similar patterns manifest within innovation ecosystems. Moving forward, fostering genuinely inclusive entrepreneurship requires moving beyond access to spaces and towards transforming the underlying rules, relationships, and resource flows that constitute them ^1,2. ^9,10,1

Conclusion

This study has provided a critical feminist political economy analysis of the gendered dynamics within Kigali’s innovation hub ecosystem. The findings demonstrate that while these hubs are vital instruments of national development strategy, they function as contested social spaces where gender inequalities are often perpetuated rather than dissolved. The primary contribution of this research is its empirical exposition of how the physical, financial, and social infrastructures of innovation remain deeply gendered, systematically shaping women entrepreneurs’ access to resources, networks, and authority ^3,5.

The analysis underscores that achieving inclusive ecosystem development requires moving beyond gender-blind approaches. Policymakers and hub managers must implement intentional designs that directly counter the specific barriers faced by women. This includes addressing gendered risk aversion in finance ⁹, creating programmes to bridge access to high-value networks, and fostering female-led investment channels. Furthermore, the long-term viability of these ecosystems depends on integrating robust sustainability and risk management principles, ensuring hubs are financially resilient and responsive to local socio-economic contexts ^4,10.

Several avenues for future scholarship are evident. Detailed mapping of the flow of alternative investment capital to women-led ventures is urgently needed, as is longitudinal research tracking entrepreneurial journeys beyond initial hub incubation. Comparative studies with other regional ecosystems would help distinguish uniquely Rwandan dynamics from broader structural challenges. Ultimately, the success of Kigali’s innovation ecosystem should be measured not merely by commercial metrics, but by its capacity to dismantle gendered architectures of opportunity and foster transformative, broad-based economic participation.

References

1. Amanya, F.S., & Njenga, G. (2022). Construction Delays and Project Cost Overrun: A Case of Regional Cybercrime Center in Gasabo District, Rwanda. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2049
2. Brou, T.Y. (2023). Urban densification and urban heat islands in Kigali, Rwanda, Densification urbaine et ilots de chaleur urbains à Kigali, Rwanda. Carnets de Recherches de l'océan Indien. https://doi.org/10.61736/carnets-oi_0905
3. Habineza, V., & Kengere, O.A. (2022). Project Planning and Welfare of Households: A Case of Biogas Project in Huye District, Rwanda. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2054
4. Hakizimana, J. (2023). Project Risk Management Practices and Performance of Construction Projects: A Case of Horizon Construction in Kigali, Rwanda. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2153
5. Iradukunda, P., Mwanaumo, E., & Kabika, J. (2023). Hydroclimatic Trend Analysis and Projection in Africa Tropical Urban Regions: Case of Lusaka, Zambia and Kigali, Rwanda. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4388053
6. M, N., FM, H., F, M., J, N., & A, M. (2022). Parental Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Antibiotics Use for Childhood Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Kicukiro District, Rwanda. Austin Public Health. https://doi.org/10.26420/austinpublichealth.2022.1018
7. Ngendahayo, I. (2023). Assessment of Food Safety Control Measures and Organisational Sustainability: A Case of Selected Hotels in Kigali, Rwanda. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4223
8. Ntaganira, S., & Irechukwu, E.N. (2022). CAMEL Approach and Financial Sector Sustainability of Commercial Banks in Rwanda: A Case of Bank of Kigali, Rwanda. Journal of Finance and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2059
9. Oline, E. (2023). Role of Project Risk Assessment on Performance of Credit Products at Bank of Africa, Rwanda. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project management. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4211
10. Vincent, K., Innocent, K., & Sauda, U. (2023). The Covid -19 Pandemic and Unemployment in Kigali City, Rwanda. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-44