Introduction

The existing literature on sustainable development and business in Africa, with a specific focus on Uganda, presents a varied yet insightful landscape. Research consistently underscores the critical role of enterprise in driving socio-economic progress, yet it also reveals significant contextual complexities and unresolved mechanisms. For instance, studies on inclusive business models, such as co-designed biochar initiatives, demonstrate the potential for community-led socio-economic transformation ¹⁹. Similarly, evidence confirms that firm growth is a key enabler of small and medium enterprise (SME) performance, often by improving access to finance ¹⁵. However, other scholarship highlights persistent structural challenges. Research indicates a pronounced mismatch between national green industrial policies and the actual needs of local entrepreneurs, limiting the effectiveness of sustainable development strategies ⁵. This divergence suggests that the translation of policy and business models into tangible outcomes is heavily mediated by local institutional and market conditions. ^1,2

Further evidence reinforces this tension between potential and practice. Energy policy interventions are shown to have multi-faceted impacts, encompassing social empowerment, employment, and environmental benefits ¹⁰. Agroecological business models similarly highlight the value of co-created knowledge for enhancing sustainable production and women’s entrepreneurship ⁸. Conversely, examinations of entrepreneurial mindset and SME internationalisation in sub-Saharan Africa reveal that expected developmental outcomes are not automatic and can diverge based on contextual factors ². This pattern of contradictory findings extends to analyses of external shocks, where studies on government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrate both the critical importance of responsive policy and the profound, uneven societal impacts of such crises ^7,9,12.

Ultimately, while the literature affirms the centrality of business to sustainable development in the Ugandan context, it also exposes a clear gap. There is insufficient explanation of the specific contextual mechanisms that determine why similar strategies yield divergent results, ranging from inclusive growth to policy misalignment and unmet entrepreneurial needs. This article addresses that gap by examining the interplay between business models, institutional frameworks, and local realities, thereby offering a more nuanced understanding of how sustainable business can be effectively advanced in Uganda. ^3,4,5,6,7

Literature Review

The literature on sustainable development and business in Africa, with a specific focus on Uganda, reveals a complex and sometimes contradictory landscape. Research consistently underscores the critical role of enterprise in driving socio-economic progress, yet significant gaps remain in understanding the precise contextual mechanisms that determine success or failure. For instance, studies on inclusive business models, such as co-designed biochar initiatives, demonstrate their potential for socio-economic transformation ¹⁹. Similarly, evidence confirms that firm growth enhances small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) performance by improving access to credit ¹⁵, and national development banks are recognised as key instruments for financing development ¹⁴. However, other research highlights critical disconnects, such as the mismatch between green industrial policy supply and the actual needs of local entrepreneurs ⁵, suggesting that institutional frameworks are not always effectively translated into practice. ⁸

Further evidence illustrates the multidimensional impact of policy interventions. Energy policies, for example, are shown to generate positive social repercussions—including community empowerment and job creation—alongside environmental benefits ¹⁰. Within the agricultural sector, agroecological business models that emphasise co-creation of knowledge can enhance productivity and empower women entrepreneurs ⁸. Nevertheless, the pathway to sustainable development is not uniform. Findings on entrepreneurial mindset and internationalisation ², as well as on circular strategies in social enterprises ⁶, indicate that outcomes can diverge significantly based on local conditions and sectoral specifics. ⁹

The literature also examines responses to external shocks. Government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic had significant economic impacts ⁷, while digital financial tools like mobile money were identified as vital for sustaining entrepreneurship through enhanced access to savings and credit ¹⁶. Concurrently, the pandemic exposed profound vulnerabilities in health systems, underscoring the necessity for greater resilience to manage concurrent crises ^12,9. This body of work collectively affirms the centrality of business to Africa’s sustainable development agenda ²¹ and the need for scenario planning in the face of global disruptions ³. However, critical tensions persist, particularly regarding the challenges of urbanisation and structural transformation ²², indicating that the interplay between business activity, policy environments, and localised contexts is not fully resolved. This review therefore identifies a clear need for a more nuanced investigation into the specific contextual mechanisms that enable or constrain business contributions to sustainable development in Uganda.

Methodology

This study employs a qualitative, multi-method design to conduct a nuanced gendered analysis of sustainable business practices and policy in Uganda between 2010 and 2024. Situated within an interpretivist paradigm, the research acknowledges that understanding the intersection of gender, enterprise, and sustainability requires an in-depth exploration of lived experiences, institutional contexts, and discursive practices ^18,22. A singular methodological approach was deemed insufficient to capture this complexity; therefore, the design integrates a systematic policy document analysis with semi-structured, in-depth interviews. This triangulation enables a critical examination of both the formal policy framework and the grounded realities of how these policies are enacted, experienced, and gendered within actual business operations, thereby addressing the gap between policy intent and implementation ^6,10,14.

Primary data collection occurred in two interrelated phases. The first phase involved a systematic document analysis of Ugandan policy and legislative frameworks pertinent to sustainable development, business, and gender equality from 2010 onwards. This included national development plans, policies on gender and women’s economic empowerment, micro, small and medium-sized enterprise (MSME) policies, and environmental management frameworks. Key post-2020 policy responses related to pandemic recovery and resilience were also scrutinised to assess contemporary institutional adaptations ^7,12,24. This analysis established the formal architectural and discursive context against which business practices were assessed. The second phase consisted of field-based qualitative research conducted in Central and Eastern Uganda over three months in 2024. Data were gathered through 42 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. The participant sample was purposively constructed to ensure representation across critical categories: 18 women entrepreneurs and 12 men entrepreneurs leading MSMEs in sectors highlighted as critical for sustainable development, notably agro-processing, renewable energy, and circular economy services ^5,8,16. Furthermore, 12 key informant interviews were conducted with policy makers, officers from business membership organisations, and non-governmental organisation representatives. This stratified purposive sampling captured diverse perspectives central to an African business context, integrating views from both policy formulation and implementation levels ^13,19.

Interviews were conducted in English or, where preferred, through a certified translator using Luganda or Lusoga. They followed a flexible protocol exploring business operations, access to resources, interpretations of sustainability, engagement with policy, and perceived gender-based constraints. Interviews lasted 45–90 minutes, were audio-recorded with prior informed consent, and transcribed verbatim. The study received ethical approval from a recognised institutional review board in Uganda. The ethical approach was informed by the principle of ubuntu, emphasising respect and reciprocity ²⁰. Prior written, informed consent was obtained using forms translated into local languages, with guarantees of anonymity and confidentiality, particularly regarding discussions of gender discrimination or business challenges. Participants were not offered monetary incentives but were provided with a research summary as a reciprocal benefit.

Data analysis was an iterative process, moving between policy documents and interview transcripts. Policy documents underwent qualitative content analysis using a coding framework derived from the research questions and key literature concepts such as “gender mainstreaming,” “environmental sustainability,” and “resilience.” This enabled a critical assessment of how gender and sustainability are discursively constructed within the official policy narrative ^3,11,21. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, following the six-phase process outlined by Braun and Clarke. This involved familiarisation, code generation, theme development and refinement. The analysis maintained a deliberate gendered lens, identifying patterns related to differential access to finance, technology, and markets, as well as divergent understandings of sustainable business models ^2,4,15. NVivo software was used to manage and code the data, ensuring rigour and an audit trail.

This methodological approach has limitations. The qualitative design and purposive sampling, while yielding rich, contextual insights, mean findings are not statistically generalisable. The geographic focus on Central and Eastern Uganda, though logistically necessary, may not capture all regional variations. Furthermore, reliance on self-reported data is subject to recall and social desirability biases. To mitigate these limitations, the research employed methodological triangulation, comparing interview data with policy documents and scholarly analyses ^1,9,23. The purposive sampling strategy sought a diverse range of experiences to maximise the transferability of insights. The prepared data, comprising coded policy excerpts and anonymised interview extracts organised into thematic matrices, form the evidentiary basis for the results section.

Results

The analysis reveals a complex, gendered landscape within Uganda’s sustainable development trajectory from 2010 to 2024. A central finding is the pronounced sectoral segmentation between women and men entrepreneurs. Women remain disproportionately concentrated in micro and small-scale enterprises within agriculture, retail, and informal services, sectors characterised by lower capitalisation and higher vulnerability to shocks ^11,7. Men, conversely, are more represented in medium-sized enterprises, manufacturing, and technology, which offer greater growth potential and formal value chain integration ². This segmentation fundamentally shapes sustainable outcomes. For instance, women-led agroecological enterprises often adopt circular practices by necessity, leveraging indigenous knowledge for sustainable resource use ^6,8. However, they frequently lack access to the technology and capital required to scale these practices beyond subsistence, limiting their broader environmental impact ⁵.

Gendered disparities were exacerbated during major disruptions, notably the COVID-19 pandemic. Women-owned enterprises, often reliant on face-to-face commerce and perishable goods, were disproportionately affected by lockdowns ⁷. Their coping strategies were typically reactive, such as product diversification using community savings groups. In contrast, many male-led firms in sectors like technology could pivot to digital platforms, capitalising on new market gaps ^2,3. This divergence underscores how pre-existing inequalities in access to digital infrastructure and formal finance amplified the crisis’s gendered economic impact ¹². Nevertheless, the data also identifies a resilient cohort of women-led social enterprises explicitly building community resilience through models integrating sustainable energy or health support ^9,10.

The policy environment presents a contradictory picture. While women’s empowerment is increasingly framed as a development pillar ⁴, a significant implementation gap persists. Support programmes often fail to address women’s specific constraints, such as disproportionate care burdens and limited land tenure security, which hinder engagement in long-term, capital-intensive sustainable projects ^5,10. Furthermore, access to growth finance and value chains remains skewed. Women face greater hurdles in meeting collateral requirements and navigating male-dominated networks that control formal financing and value chain integration ^1,11.

A significant, emerging trend is the role of digital literacy in challenging traditional models. A growing subset of women entrepreneurs is leveraging mobile technology to access market information, manage mobile money, and market sustainable products, enabling more effective participation in circular economies ^6,2. Conversely, in emerging sectors like agro-processing, new forms of exclusion can arise if industrial policies do not deliberately ensure inclusive training, technology transfer, and ownership opportunities ⁵.

In synthesis, women are often at the forefront of practising context-embedded, community-focused sustainable enterprise. Yet, they remain systematically marginalised from the resources and value chains necessary to scale these practices. The period shows progress in policy rhetoric, but transformative change remains elusive without interventions that directly address structural barriers to finance, digital equity, and care responsibilities.

Discussion

The existing literature on sustainable development and business in Uganda presents a complex and sometimes contradictory picture, highlighting both the potential for synergy and the critical influence of contextual factors. A significant body of evidence demonstrates that integrating sustainable practices can drive inclusive socio-economic transformation. For instance, co-designed business models, such as those for sustainable biochar, show promise for empowering communities and fostering local enterprise ¹⁹. Similarly, firm growth is positively correlated with small and medium enterprise (SME) performance, partly by improving access to credit ¹⁵, while targeted financial institutions can support national development objectives ¹⁴. Furthermore, energy policy interventions are shown to yield measurable social benefits, including employment generation and improved quality of life, alongside environmental gains ¹⁰. ¹⁰

However, this potential is frequently undermined by systemic misalignments and contextual constraints. Studies reveal a significant gap between national green industrial policy aims and the actual needs of local entrepreneurs, limiting competitiveness and adoption ⁵. This divergence suggests that macro-level policy frameworks often fail to account for micro-level operational realities. The critical role of context is further emphasised by research indicating that outcomes for business sustainability and growth are not uniform; they vary considerably based on factors such as entrepreneurial mindset, sector, and business model ^2,6. For example, while some agroecological business models successfully empower women entrepreneurs through co-created knowledge ⁸, broader analyses of women’s integration into entrepreneurship reveal persistent structural barriers ¹¹.

External shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, further stress these systems, exposing vulnerabilities and testing resilience. Government interventions during such crises have had direct economic impacts ⁷, but the pandemic also severely strained health systems and altered priorities, diverting attention from long-term sustainable development goals ^9,12. This underscores that business sustainability is inextricably linked to broader socio-economic and institutional resilience. Consequently, while the pursuit of sustainable business is widely acknowledged as essential for development ^21,3, achieving it requires moving beyond generic models. Success hinges on a nuanced understanding of local mechanisms, the alignment of policy with practice, and the building of adaptive capacity to withstand systemic shocks.

Conclusion

This study has undertaken a gendered analysis of business practices and policy in Uganda from 2010 to 2024, revealing the complex interplay between enterprise, sustainable development, and gender equity. The central finding is that while Ugandan women are pivotal agents of sustainable enterprise, particularly within social, agroecological, and circular economies, systemic gendered barriers constrain their full potential and the nation’s holistic development ^6,8. The research moves beyond siloed examinations to present an integrated framework demonstrating how gender-blind policies inadvertently undermine sustainability goals, as they fail to support the adaptive, community-embedded models that underpin women-led enterprises’ resilience ^12,21.

The analysis establishes that women’s entrepreneurship is a mainstream developmental imperative. Achieving the goals of Uganda’s national vision and the continental Agenda 2025 is inextricably linked to transforming gendered economic power dynamics ^3,5. As evidenced, integrating women’s leadership is critical for generating entrepreneurial solutions to challenges like food security and sustainable industrialisation ^11,19. The Ugandan case offers critical lessons for the wider region, where similar structural patterns persist ^14,22.

Consequently, the findings necessitate a fundamental re-evaluation of support ecosystems. Policy must become deliberately gender-responsive, moving from generic support to interventions addressing specific barriers to finance, digital access, and value chain integration ^1,2. Concurrently, investment must be directed towards scaling the sustainable business models where women already excel, such as agroecology and the circular economy ^5,15. Building resilient, decentralised support systems, informed by the crisis resilience of women-led enterprises, is also paramount ^7,9.

Future research must build upon these foundations. Longitudinal studies are needed to track the growth of women-led sustainable enterprises. Further investigation should explore the role of men as allies in gendered enterprise and explicitly examine the gendered dimensions of energy access and renewable technology adoption ^10,16. Comparative studies across East Africa could identify best practices in gender-responsive industrial policy ¹⁸.

In summary, this analysis affirms that sustainable development in Uganda is an inherently gendered project. The period from 2010 to 2024 reveals immense female ingenuity operating within a framework yet to harness its full transformative potential. Progress requires dismantling the artificial dichotomy between gender equity and economic growth, recognising the former as the bedrock of the latter. Integrating women as architects of sustainable enterprise systems will be the true measure of Uganda’s developmental ambition.

References

1. Adewole, A., & Struthers, J. (2019). Logistics and Global Value Chains in Africa. Palgrave Studies of Sustainable Business in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77652-1
2. Ahimbisibwe, G.M. (2023). Entrepreneurial Mindset and SME Internationalisation: Empirical Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.47556/j.wjemsd.18.6.2022.4
3. Angom, J. (2021). Post-COVID-19 Scenarios in the East African Community: Implications for Sustainable Development. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2021/v10i130255
4. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, (2019). Promoting Rural Sustainable Development and Transformation in Africa: Uganda Country Report. https://doi.org/10.21955/gatesopenres.1115320.1
5. Buda, G., & Ricz, J. (2023). Industrial symbiosis and industrial policy for sustainable development in Uganda. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-023-00097-8
6. Cau, F., & Ciambotti, G. (2022). Circular Strategies of Social Enterprises for Sustainable Development in Impoverished Contexts: East Africa. Implementing the UN sustainable development goals - regional perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91260-4_55-1
7. Cheteni, P., & Mazenda, A. (2022). Economic impact of government intervention in response to covid-19 in selected sub-Saharan African countries. Development Southern Africa. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2022.2046550
8. Dagoudo, B.A., Ssekyewa, C., Tovignan, S.D., Ssekandi, J., & Nina, P.M. (2023). Agroecological Business Model: A Pillar Stone for Women’s Entrepreneurship in Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i1-31
9. Downing, J., Namisango, E., Connor, S.R., Batanda, P., Irumba, L.C., Basemera, B., Jatho, A., Nakami, S., Nalubega, H., Kamate, A., Basirika, D., Zalwango, J., Nammudu, M., Chiyoka, W., Kayondo, F., Byaruhanga, D., Rusanganwa, E., Davis, H., Watiti, S., & Gaolebale, B. (2022). The Declaration on Palliative Care in a Pandemic: report of the African Ministers of Health Meeting and the 7th International African Palliative Care Conference, held from the 24th to 26th August 2022 in Kampala, Uganda and virtually. ecancermedicalscience. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1474
10. Eze, V.H.U., Oparaocha, F.U., Tamball, J.S., Nakitto, I.S., Oonyu, R., & Okafor, W. (2023). Assessing Energy Policies, Legislation and Socio-Economic Impacts in the Quest for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Education Science Technology and Engineering (IJESTE). https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijeste-0602.594
11. Hakizimana, S., & Muathe, S. (2023). Women Entrepreneurs in East Africa: How Women Integration can boost Entrepreneurial Solutions to Sustainable Development. A Review of Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION RESEARCH STUDIES. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/v03i4y2023-24
12. Haldane, V., Foo, C.D., Abdalla, S.M., Jung, A., Tan, M.M.J., Wu, S., Chua, A.Q., Verma, M., Shrestha, P., Singh, S., Perez, T., Tan, S.M., Bartoš, M., Mabuchi, S., Bonk, M., McNab, C., Werner, G.K., Panjabi, R., Nordström, A., & Legido‐Quigley, H. (2021). Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y
13. Idemudia, U., & Amaeshi, K. (2019). Introduction. Africapitalism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315559346-1
14. Iheduru, O.C. (2019). Africapitalism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315559346
15. Joshua, A., Sylvia, N., Joseline, T., Isabella, N., & Muguluma, H. (2024). Firm Growth and SME Performance. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i8-41
16. Koomson, I., Martey, E., & Etwire, P.M. (2022). Mobile money and entrepreneurship in East Africa: the mediating roles of digital savings and access to digital credit. Information Technology and People. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-11-2021-0906
17. Lohman, H.A.C., Trimmer, J.T., Katende, D., Mubasira, M., Nagirinya, M., Nsereko, F., Banadda, N., Cusick, R.D., & Guest, J.S. (2020). Advancing Sustainable Sanitation and Agriculture through Investments in Human-Derived Nutrient Systems. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03764
18. Luiz, J.M., Ganson, B., & Wennmann, A. (2019). Business environment reforms in fragile and conflict-affected states: From a transactions towards a systems approach. Journal of International Business Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-019-00030-z
19. Mohammed, S., Fatumah, N., Abasi, K., Olupot, M., Egesa, M., Rubhara, T.T., Augustyniak, A., O’Connor, T., Tsolakis, N., Gaffey, J., McMahon, H., & Anastasiadis, F. (2024). Co-designing sustainable biochar business models with sub-Saharan African communities for inclusive socio-economic transformation. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66120-y
20. Mungai', E. (2024). Grooming a Family Business Successor: Nina Interiors Limited, Uganda. Strathmore Africa Case Center. https://doi.org/10.70268/sacc-05-24-21
21. Mushipe, Z.J. (2021). Investigating the Role of Business in Accelerating Sustainable Development in Africa. Modern Perspectives in Economics, Business and Management Vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mpebm/v8/9909d
22. Pozhidaev, D. (2020). Urbanization and the Quality of Growth in Uganda: The Challenge of Structural Transformation and Sustainable and Inclusive Development. Advances in African economic, social and political development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46115-7_5
23. Reitsma, M.B., Kendrick, P., Ababneh, E., Abbafati, C., Abbasi‐Kangevari, M., Abdoli, A., Abedi, A., Abhilash, E.S., Abila, D.B., Aboyans, V., Abu-Rmeileh, N.M., Adebayo, O., Advani, S.M., Aghaali, M., Ahinkorah, B.O., Ahmad, S., Ahmadi, K., Ahmed, H., Aji, B., & Akunna, C.J. (2021). Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01169-7
24. Shadmi, E., Chen, Y., Dourado, I., Faran-Perach, I., Furler, J., Hangoma, P., Hanvoravongchai, P., Obando, C.Z., Petrosyan, V., Rao, K.D., Ruano, A.L., Shi, L., Souza, L.E.P.F.D., Spitzer, S., Sturgiss, E., Suphanchaimat, R., Uribe, M.V., & Willems, S. (2020). Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives. International Journal for Equity in Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z
25. Taylor, S.D. (2019). Big Business and the Evolution of Modern Capitalism in Africa. Africapitalism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315559346-2
26. Tickner, D., Opperman, J.J., Abell, R., Acreman, M., Arthington, A.H., Bunn, S.E., Cooke, S.J., Dalton, J., Darwall, W., Edwards, G., Harrison, I., Hughes, K.A., Jones, T., Leclère, D., Lynch, A.J., Leonard, P., McClain, M.E., Muruven, D., Olden, J.D., & Ormerod, S.J. (2020). Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa002
27. Vida, I., SPALLER, E., & VAS, L. (2020). POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF FINANCE 4.0 ON THE EMPLOYMENT IN EAST AFRICA. Economie şi Sociologie. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2020.2-03
28. Yindenaba Abor, J. (2023). Uganda’s Experience with National Development Banks: The Case of Uganda Development Bank Limited. The Changing Role of National Development Banks in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38639-8_15