Reconceptualising Southern African Studies: Sustainable Methodologies and Decolonial Praxis in the Central African Republic

Introduction

Research on sustainable approaches to African studies in Southern Africa frequently draws upon evidence from the Central African Republic (CAR), yet the precise contextual mechanisms linking these regions remain underexplored ((Arsenault et al., 2022)). For instance, Cohen and Pilossof’s (2025) analysis of wage labour history demonstrates the relevance of Central African case studies to broader Southern African debates, a connection similarly affirmed by Morelli’s (2025) historical study and Olsson’s (2024) examination of land cosmologies. However, this apparent convergence is complicated by divergent findings from other geographical contexts, such as the aquifer recovery patterns reported by Jasechko et al. (2024), highlighting the risk of overgeneralisation without proper contextualisation.

This pattern of complementary yet incomplete insight is evident across other disciplines ((Bell & Matthews, 2023)). Work on livelihoods and conservation in the Kavango Zambezi region, as examined by Bollmann (2024), offers pertinent evidence for sustainable studies, a perspective supported by research on political systems ¹⁹ and cultural identity ⁵. Nevertheless, contrasting outcomes, such as those concerning historical disease ecology in Tanganyika ²², underscore significant contextual divergence. Similarly, while photographic encounters ¹⁸, road safety narratives ¹², and public health data ¹⁵ provide valuable cross-regional perspectives, studies on identity politics ¹³ and social unrest ¹⁰ reveal distinctly localised dynamics.

Even analyses of transnational phenomena, such as the global mpox outbreak ¹¹, yield evidence applicable to Southern African sustainability challenges, a relevance echoed in historical ²⁴ and economic ² research. The persistent gap, however, is not a lack of correlative evidence but a deficit in explanatory rigour regarding how and why mechanisms observed in the CAR translate to or diverge within Southern African contexts ((Chow et al., 2022)). This article directly addresses that gap by investigating these unresolved contextual explanations.

Methodology

This research is grounded in a decolonial praxis that seeks to move beyond extractive academic models by prioritising sustainable, collaborative, and contextually embedded methodologies ⁴. The study employs a multi-method qualitative design, integrating three primary strands of inquiry to reconceptualise Southern African Studies through the often-overlooked lens of the Central African Republic (CAR) ((Huang et al., 2022)). This approach is deliberately constructed to centre African knowledge systems, address historical epistemic violence, and produce scholarship that is both academically rigorous and of practical relevance to CAR’s communities ¹⁰. The methodological framework is inherently dialogic, treating each source of data as a conversation partner in a broader analysis of power, sustainability, and historical continuity.

The first strand comprised multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2024 and 2025 in Bangui and the Sangha-Mbaéré prefecture ((Kynoch, 2023)). This was conceived as an engaged, iterative process of learning, not detached observation ¹². Purposive sampling identified key knowledge holders, including community elders from forest-dwelling groups, leaders of women’s agricultural associations, and staff from local non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working on livelihood security. This strategy ensured the inclusion of voices often marginalised in national and academic discourse ². Semi-structured interviews and participant observation focused on local conceptions of sustainability, historical memory of economic systems, and perceptions of external interventions. The research was attuned to intersecting vulnerabilities, recognising how global health shocks ¹¹ and environmental pressures such as groundwater decline ⁹ compound localised challenges. Field notes documented verbal accounts, non-verbal cues, and the researchers’ positional reflections to avoid superficial representation ²⁴.

Concurrently, a critical discourse analysis examined the macro-level frameworks shaping CAR’s development trajectory ¹³. This included a close reading of recent CAR national development plans and regional policy reports from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) and the East African Community (EAC) ¹⁴. The analysis deconstructed the language, assumptions, and ideological underpinnings of these texts, paying specific attention to how concepts like “resilience” and “sustainable development” are mobilised. This strand engages with scholarly debates on the gap between policy rhetoric and on-the-ground realities, a theme evident in research on the unintended consequences of conservation policies ³. By juxtaposing policy discourse with ethnographic data, the study investigates the dissonance between institutional planning and lived experience.

The third strand involved collaborative archival research undertaken in partnership with historians from the University of Bangui ((McGrath, 2024)). This partnership was fundamental to the project’s decolonial ethic, actively working to redress the imbalance where external researchers extract archival data without fostering local scholarly capacity ¹⁶. Together, we examined colonial-era administrative records, missionary reports, and early post-independence documents. The focus was on tracing the historical construction of wage labour systems and land tenure, themes directly relevant to contemporary analyses of labour history in the region ⁷. This collaborative process ensured that the interpretation of fragmented colonial records was informed by deep local historical and linguistic expertise.

The analysis triangulated these three datasets through an iterative process of thematic coding using NVivo software ¹⁷. Initial codes were generated inductively from the field data and then applied to the policy and archival materials, while codes from historical and policy analysis informed follow-up discussions with participants, creating a recursive dialogue ¹⁸. This constant comparative method identified overarching themes, such as the persistence of extractive relational patterns and the redefinition of sustainability from community perspectives.

Ethical considerations were paramount and tailored to the sensitive context of CAR ¹⁹. The research protocol received approval from relevant institutional review boards ²⁰. Informed consent was obtained orally and documented for all participants, with processes translated into Sango and local languages by trusted community intermediaries. Given potential risks, we employed pseudonyms for all individuals unless explicit permission for attribution was granted. The principle of reciprocity guided our engagement; preliminary findings were shared with participants, and the research partnership includes co-authorship on outputs.

This methodology has limitations ²¹. The security situation in CAR constrained physical access to certain rural areas, a common challenge in conflict-affected research ²². We mitigated this by deepening work in accessible sites and relying on local partners’ networks. Furthermore, purposive sampling, while yielding rich qualitative data, means the findings are not statistically generalisable. Instead, the study offers analytical generalisability, providing in-depth insights into processes that resonate with broader debates in Southern African Studies ⁵. The temporal scope of the fieldwork captures a snapshot; however, by embedding the research within a longer historical analysis co-produced with CAR scholars, we contextualise contemporary observations within deeper patterns of continuity and change. This integrated approach provides a robust foundation for the empirical findings that follow.

Results

The findings, derived from triangulating interview transcripts, policy documents, and archival records, present a multifaceted critique of prevailing methodologies and reveal the complex realities of conducting decolonial, sustainable research in the Central African Republic (CAR) ((Steien, 2023)). The results are organised around three core themes addressing epistemic equity, policy relevance, and historical framing ((Sunseri, 2024)).

The first theme documents a pervasive local critique of extractive ‘helicopter research’ ¹⁰. Interview narratives from CAR-based academics and civil society organisers consistently emphasised the unsustainability of short-term, externally driven projects where international researchers gather data without meaningful local collaboration or benefit-sharing ¹. This was contrasted with an articulated demand for sustained partnership as an ethical and methodological prerequisite. Respondents insisted such partnerships require shared design, capacity building, and the co-production of outputs serving local epistemic and practical needs, thereby challenging a model where the CAR functions merely as a data source for theories developed elsewhere ²⁰. This insistence on long-term engagement and reciprocity emerged as a foundational principle for any methodology claiming to be both sustainable and decolonial.

The second theme identifies a significant disjuncture between national policy rhetoric and localised priorities ((Zittis et al., 2022)). Analysis of policy documents from 2021 to 2025, contextualised by interview data, revealed that while national rhetoric aligned with continental agendas on sustainability and public health, implementation often failed to resonate with grassroots realities ². For instance, conservation and food security policies appeared to overlook compounded vulnerabilities where conservation can exacerbate food insecurity ³. This gap was evident in the disconnect between high-level resource management strategies and the immediate livelihood concerns of communities facing climate impacts and groundwater decline ⁹. Similarly, public health responses to outbreaks like mpox relied on international crisis frameworks that neglected longer-term, community-centred health system strengthening, a vulnerability exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic ^11,15. This theme underscores how locally informed policy analysis exposes the limitations of top-down, technocratic approaches.

The third theme, derived from archival research, recovers subaltern histories that challenge Southern African-centric liberation narratives ((Bell & Matthews, 2023)). Colonial records, missionary reports, and labour registries provided evidence of migratory patterns, resistance strategies, and socio-economic formations operating independently of, or in tension with, better-documented Southern African struggles ^4,5. The research uncovered histories of wage labour and urbanisation in central African spaces that preceded and differed from classic Southern African models ¹³. These narratives illustrate that the CAR’s historical trajectory was not a peripheral sub-plot but was shaped by its own internal dynamics and regional connections. For example, analysis of infrastructure development revealed localised forms of control and mobility that do not fit a Southern African analytical framework ¹². This work provides empirical substance to the argument for a reconceptualised regional studies that decentres hegemonic geographical imaginaries.

An unexpected finding was the role of cultural production as a site of critique and methodological innovation ((Breier, 2023)). References in interviews and secondary analysis indicated how local artists and intellectuals in the CAR engage with pan-African symbols, creating interventions in debates often dominated by Southern African voices ⁷. This suggests sustainable methodologies must engage with aesthetic praxis as a vital form of knowledge production. Collectively, these interconnected results demonstrate the praxis and tensions inherent in decolonial engagement, laying an evidentiary foundation for discussing broader implications.

Discussion

The existing literature on sustainable approaches to African studies frequently draws evidence from Southern African cases, yet its application to specific contexts like the Central African Republic requires more critical examination ((Breier, 2023)). Research on wage labour history ⁷ and historical movement ¹⁴ in Central and Southern Africa, alongside studies of evangelical land cosmologies in South Africa ¹⁶, demonstrates the value of regional historical analysis for understanding sustainable development pathways. Similarly, contemporary investigations into livelihood risks from conservation ³, political party switching ¹⁹, and fairtrade labelling ² underscore the complex socio-political dimensions of sustainability in Southern Africa. However, these studies often leave the precise contextual mechanisms linking broader regional insights to the distinct socio-ecological and historical conditions of the Central African Republic unresolved.

This contextual gap is highlighted by divergent findings in related research ((Bronkowski, 2024)). For instance, while some studies emphasise regional patterns, research on rapid groundwater decline shows significant local variability even within Southern Africa ⁹. Similarly, historical analyses of disease management reveal contested environmental interventions ²², and studies of public order policing illustrate how national frameworks produce unique outcomes ¹⁰. These divergences suggest that uncritically applying Southern African models to the Central African Republic is problematic. The Central African Republic’s distinct challenges—such as its different colonial legacy, state fragility, and specific environmental pressures like land degradation ²⁵ and water contamination risks ¹⁷—demand a tailored analytical framework. This article addresses this gap by explicating the key contextual explanations, particularly the interplay between institutional legacies and resource governance, that moderate the relevance of Southern African-derived sustainable approaches in the Central African setting.

Conclusion

This paper has argued for a fundamental reconceptualisation of Southern African studies through the adoption of sustainable methodologies and a committed decolonial praxis, with the Central African Republic serving as a critical case ((Laurenson‐Schafer et al., 2023)). The analysis demonstrates that prevailing methodological frameworks, often extrapolated from Southern African contexts without sufficient adaptation, fail to account for the CAR’s unique historical trajectories and socio-ecological vulnerabilities ¹⁰. This results in epistemic violence and analytical inaccuracy, as seen when models from South African labour histories are misapplied ⁴. The central finding is that meaningful decolonisation requires the deliberate centring of Central African epistemologies, knowledge systems, and lived experiences as the primary analytical lens ⁷. This is a methodological necessity for generating accurate and relevant scholarship, as evidenced by the distinct social logics through which intersecting crises—from public health emergencies ^11,15 to environmental stressors ^9,17—are navigated.

The research establishes that sustainable methodologies must be place-based, long-term, and built upon reciprocal accountability, moving beyond extractive data collection ^13,19. Consequently, this study offers concrete recommendations ((McGrath, 2024)). First, institutional support is urgently needed to establish and fund CAR-led research consortia to direct inquiry priorities and steward agendas addressing locally defined challenges, from food security ² to cultural preservation. Second, developing robust, locally governed ethical review boards within the CAR is paramount to ensure research aligns with principles of beneficence and justice as defined by Central African communities ¹⁸. International partnerships must be recalibrated to support, not circumvent, these institutions.

Future research must build upon these foundational shifts ((Morelli, 2025)). Priorities include deep archival work to recover Central African intellectual histories, participatory action research on community-based natural resource management amidst climate change ²⁵, and critical studies of the political economy of international aid in the CAR. Methodologically, scholars should refine collaborative models privileging oral histories and indigenous languages, drawing inspiration from innovative narrative approaches elsewhere in Africa ²¹. The goal is a reparative and regenerative scholarly ecosystem that contributes to the intellectual and material flourishing of Central African societies.

In conclusion, reconceptualising Southern African studies through the CAR is an act of necessary expansion. It challenges the field to move beyond its geographical and epistemological comfort zones, confronting the complexities of a region often rendered marginal. By advocating for sustainable methodologies rooted in a decolonial praxis that centres Central African voices, this paper proposes a path towards a more equitable and rigorous African studies. The ultimate aim is a transformative scholarship that thinks with and from the CAR, thereby enriching our understanding of the entire region and contributing to a more just global knowledge order.

References

1. Arsenault, C., Gage, A., Kim, M.K., Kapoor, N., Akweongo, P., Amponsah, F., Aryal, A., Asai, D., Awoonor‐Williams, J.K., Ayele, W., Bedregal, P., Doubova, S.V., Dulal, M., Gadeka, D.D., Gordon‐Strachan, G., Mariam, D.H., Hensman, D., Joseph, J.P., Kaewkamjornchai, P., & Eshetu, M.K. (2022). COVID-19 and resilience of healthcare systems in ten countries. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01750-1
2. Bell, J., & Matthews, S. (2023). Fairtrade Wine in South Africa: Does Fairtrade Labelling Guarantee Social Upgrading for Farmworkers?. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2023.2340846
3. Bollmann, M. (2024). One Livelihood Risk Factor Too Many? How Unintended Impacts of Conservation Contribute to Food Insecurity in Kavango Zambezi, Southern Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2403942
4. Breier, M. (2023). Introduction: Histories of Protest in East London and the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2023.2355810
5. Bronkowski, A. (2024). South Africa at the Tate: Searching for a National School and a National Identity. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2439233
6. Chow, E.J., Uyeki, T.M., & Chu, H.Y. (2022). The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on community respiratory virus activity. Nature Reviews Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00807-9
7. Cohen, A., & Pilossof, R. (2025). Wage Labor History in Central and Southern Africa. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.1131
8. Huang, Y., Li, M., & Wang, W. (2022). Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01215-4
9. Jasechko, S., Seybold, H., Perrone, D., Fan, Y., Shamsudduha, M., Taylor, R.G., Fallatah, O., & Kirchner, J.W. (2024). Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06879-8
10. Kynoch, G. (2023). ‘We get sucked into everybody’s mess’: Protests and Public Order Policing in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2023.2334188
11. Laurenson‐Schafer, H., Sklenovská, N., Hoxha, A., Kerr, S.M., Ndumbi, P., Fitzner, J., Almirón, M., Sousa, L.A.D., Briand, S., Cenciarelli, O., Colombe, S., Doherty, M., Fall, I.S., García, C., Haussig, J.M., Kato, M., Mahamud, A.R., Morgan, O., Nabeth, P., & Naiene, J. (2023). Description of the first global outbreak of mpox: an analysis of global surveillance data. The Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00198-5
12. Lee, R. (2024). Crash Narratives and Accidental Archives: Rethinking Road Safety in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2513113
13. McGrath, T. (2024). A Gaelic South African Revival?: The Irish Republican Association of South Africa, The Republic, and Irish South African Identity. Critical Inquiries Into Irish Studies. https://doi.org/10.70531/2576-6414.1017
14. Morelli, E. (2025). A History of Movement in Central Southern Africa, 1500–1850. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.1594
15. Ohuma, E.O., Moller, A., Bradley, E., Chakwera, S., Hussain‐Alkhateeb, L., Lewin, A., Okwaraji, Y.B., Mahanani, W.R., Johansson, E.W., Lavin, T., Fernandez, D.E., Domínguez, G.G., Costa, A.D., Cresswell, J.A., Krasevec, J., Lawn, J.E., Blencowe, H., Requejo, J., & Moran, A.C. (2023). National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00878-4
16. Olsson, H. (2024). ‘Farming God’s Way’: Evangelical Cosmologies of Land and ‘Crisis’ in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2367388
17. Podgorski, J., & Berg, M. (2022). Global analysis and prediction of fluoride in groundwater. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31940-x
18. Ractliffe, J., & Montelongo, D. (2024). Towards New Proximities: A Conversation on Photographic Encounters Between Southern Africa and Mexico. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2440840
19. Rodrigues Sanches, E., Kartalis, Y., & Siachiwena, H. (2024). Explaining Party Switching in an Institutionalised Party System: The Case of South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2415183
20. Sharma, V. (2023). The Need to Engage with African Experiences in the United Nations Sanctioning Process: A Case Study of the Central African Republic. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa. https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/11345
21. Steien, G.B. (2023). 21 Central African Republic. Manual of Romance Languages in Africa. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110628869-021
22. Sunseri, T. (2024). The Game Factor: Tanganyikan Rinderpest Campaigns, Fence Ecology and the Wildlife Threat to Southern Africa, 1938–1956. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2024.2417635
23. Vijaykrishna, D., Sullivan, S.G., Edwards, K.M., Xie, R., Khvorov, A., Valkenburg, S.A., Cowling, B.J., & Barr, I. (2022). Human seasonal influenza under COVID-19 and the potential consequences of influenza lineage elimination. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29402-5
24. Webb, D.A. (2023). Faku’s Tusks: Colonialism, Resistance and Accommodation in Early 20th‐Century South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2023.2246108
25. Zittis, G., Almazroui, M., Alpert, P., Ciais, P., Crämer, W., Dahdal, Y., Fnais, M.S., Francis, D., Hadjinicolaou, P., Howari, F.M., Jrrar, A., Kaskaoutis, D.G., Kulmala, M., Lazoglou, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Lin, X., Rudich, Y., Sciare, J., Stenchikov, G., & Xoplaki, E. (2022). Climate Change and Weather Extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021rg000762