African Hydrology Research (Earth Science focus)

Advancing Scholarship Across the Continent

Vol. 2000 No. 1 (2000)

View Issue TOC

Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in South Africa Using Difference-in-Differences Modelling for System Reliability Assessment

Sibusiso Mkhwanazi, African Institute for Mathematical Sciences (AIMS) South Africa Nomalanga Nkosi, Department of Internal Medicine, Nelson Mandela University
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18710303
Published: June 23, 2000

Abstract

Public health surveillance systems in South Africa are crucial for monitoring outbreaks of infectious diseases such as influenza and tuberculosis (TB). These systems rely on timely data collection and analysis to inform public health interventions. A DiD model will be applied to historical data from two provinces: Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal. The model will estimate the impact of a new reporting standard on surveillance accuracy, using province-specific pre- and post-intervention trends as control variables. The analysis indicates that the new reporting standard improved the detection rate of TB cases by 15% in Gauteng, with a confidence interval of ±3.0%. The DiD model demonstrated its effectiveness in evaluating system reliability, providing actionable insights for enhancing public health surveillance in South Africa. Future research should expand the DiD application to additional provinces and incorporate real-time data sources to further validate system performance. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.

How to Cite

Sibusiso Mkhwanazi, Nomalanga Nkosi (2000). Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in South Africa Using Difference-in-Differences Modelling for System Reliability Assessment. African Hydrology Research (Earth Science focus), Vol. 2000 No. 1 (2000). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18710303

Keywords

AfricanGeographicSurveillanceReliabilityDifference-in-DifferencesQuasi-experimentalEvaluation

References