African Hydrogeology (Earth Science)

Advancing Scholarship Across the Continent

Vol. 2000 No. 1 (2000)

View Issue TOC

Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Off-Grid Systems in Ugandan Communities

Sempaire Amama, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) Otim Mwesigwa, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Busitema University Okello Ayirei, Kyambogo University, Kampala Kabasa Kizza, Department of Research, National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18711213
Published: January 5, 2000

Abstract

Off-grid communities in Uganda face significant challenges in accessing sustainable energy solutions. A Bayesian hierarchical model was developed to assess the financial viability and sustainability of different off-grid system configurations for Ugandan communities, accounting for variability across geographical regions and community sizes. The model indicated that solar home systems were generally more cost-effective than hybrid systems in terms of per capita investment costs over a five-year period (mean: £500 vs. £700). Bayesian hierarchical modelling provides a robust framework for evaluating the economic performance and sustainability of off-grid energy solutions, offering insights into resource allocation and policy-making. Communities should prioritise solar home systems in their energy planning to minimise per capita investment costs while ensuring long-term energy security. Policy makers could consider subsidies or grants for these technologies. The empirical specification follows $Y=\beta_0+\beta^\top X+\varepsilon$, and inference is reported with uncertainty-aware statistical criteria.

How to Cite

Sempaire Amama, Otim Mwesigwa, Okello Ayirei, Kabasa Kizza (2000). Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Off-Grid Systems in Ugandan Communities. African Hydrogeology (Earth Science), Vol. 2000 No. 1 (2000). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18711213

Keywords

UgandaBayesianHierarchicalModelCost-EffectivenessSustainabilityMethodology

References