African Cardiology Review

Advancing Scholarship Across the Continent

Vol. 2001 No. 1 (2001)

View Issue TOC

Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Ghana: Quasi-Experimental Design for System Reliability Assessment

Esi Aidoo, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) Kofi Amoako, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18725073
Published: June 22, 2001

Abstract

Public health surveillance systems in Ghana are crucial for monitoring diseases and outbreaks but may suffer from inefficiencies and biases. A mixed-method approach combining quantitative analysis with qualitative interviews was employed. The study utilised logistic regression for system performance assessment. The preliminary findings suggest that while the system detects a majority of reported cases (85%), there is room for reducing false positives to enhance reliability and reduce unnecessary interventions. This methodological evaluation provides insights into improving public health surveillance systems in Ghana, contributing to more effective disease control strategies. Investigate ways to minimise false positives without compromising the system’s ability to alert on potential outbreaks. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.

How to Cite

Esi Aidoo, Kofi Amoako (2001). Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Ghana: Quasi-Experimental Design for System Reliability Assessment. African Cardiology Review, Vol. 2001 No. 1 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18725073

Keywords

Sub-Saharansurveillancemethodologybiasevaluationreliabilityvalidity

References