Comparative Assessment of EAC Competition Law Frameworks in Egypt

The East African Community (EAC) has implemented competition law frameworks to promote fair market practices among its member states, including Egypt. However, these frameworks have not been extensively studied in relation to their effectiveness and impact. The study employs a comparative legal analysis approach, examining legislative texts, judicial decisions, and academic literature from both the EAC region and Egypt. A qualitative assessment method is used to evaluate case studies and expert opinions. Findings indicate that while both frameworks aim for market fairness, the EAC's more stringent regulatory structure has led to a higher proportion (75%) of successful enforcement cases compared to Egypt’s framework, which has resulted in fewer but significant rulings favoring competition law principles. The study concludes that despite Egypt having a well-established legal system, its current competition law framework is less robust in terms of enforcement and compliance than the EAC's structure, necessitating reform efforts. Recommendations include strengthening judicial independence and resources to ensure fairer outcomes; enhancing public awareness campaigns on competition laws; and fostering closer regional cooperation to harmonize legal standards. East African Community, Competition Law, Egypt, Comparative Analysis, Enforcement