Author Guidelines

African Social Geography (Geography/Social) accepts manuscripts that are prepared for formal editorial handling and peer review. Before starting a submission, authors should confirm that the work is within the journal's scope, that the manuscript is written in clear UK English, and that all authors approve the submitted version.

Author Responsibilities

Authors should evaluate fit carefully. This journal prioritises manuscripts in interdisciplinary scholarship and expects a visible connection to Geography/Social. Papers that are too generic, poorly referenced, or only loosely connected to the stated field are likely to be returned at editorial screening.

• Submit work that clearly contributes to Social, Geography.
• Ensure the abstract accurately summarises the question, approach, and main contribution.
• Confirm that tables, figures, equations, and appendices are cited correctly in the manuscript.
• Check that institutional affiliations, ORCID identifiers where available, and contact details are accurate.

Formatting Expectations

Manuscripts should normally contain a title, author details, abstract, keywords, main text, acknowledgements where relevant, declarations, and references. Depending on study type, authors may also need appendices, supplementary files, data notes, figure legends, or protocol material. For this journal, preferred reporting practice includes appropriate disciplinary or interdisciplinary methods, transparent evidence handling, and clear reporting standards.

Authors should use section headings that suit the type of work submitted. Original empirical studies should present a clear research problem, methods, findings, and discussion. Review or conceptual papers should explain the logic of selection, synthesis, or argumentation rather than relying on broad descriptive summary.

Declarations and Transparency

Every manuscript must include the declarations relevant to its design and content. These may include ethics approval, participant consent, animal care statements, funding acknowledgement, conflicts of interest, author-contribution notes, and data or code availability. The journal expects well-defined questions, reproducible or inspectable methods, and honest presentation of scope and limitation.

Where the manuscript involves sensitive data, restricted datasets, or institutional permissions, the submission should explain the constraint and describe what can still be shared for verification or scholarly reuse.

Editorial Workflow

After submission, the editorial office undertakes initial checks before deciding whether the manuscript proceeds to peer review, revision, or desk rejection. Authors should expect an initial editorial response within approximately 42 days for a routine submission, although timing varies with reviewer availability and manuscript complexity.

If revisions are requested, authors are normally expected to respond within 15 days unless a different schedule is communicated. Revised submissions should be accompanied by a point-by-point response that explains how each editorial or reviewer concern has been addressed.