African Law of Evidence

Advancing Scholarship Across the Continent

Vol. 2008 No. 1 (2008)

View Issue TOC

Constitutional Review Processes and Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry

Abimbola Adekanmi, Department of Advanced Studies, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881644
Published: February 17, 2008

Abstract

Nigeria's constitution has undergone several reviews since independence in , reflecting its complex political landscape and challenges to democratic consolidation. A mixed-methods approach is employed, integrating semi-structured interviews with a national survey to investigate perceptions and practices related to constitutionality changes in Nigeria. Findings reveal that approximately 70% of respondents associate frequent constitutional amendments with democratic erosion, emphasising the need for more stable legal frameworks. The study concludes that while periodic reviews are necessary, they must be conducted with caution to avoid undermining democratic processes and institutions. Policy makers should prioritise public engagement in constitution-making processes and adopt a balanced approach to constitutional amendments to ensure stability and legitimacy.

How to Cite

Abimbola Adekanmi (2008). Constitutional Review Processes and Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry. African Law of Evidence, Vol. 2008 No. 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18881644

Keywords

NigeriaSub-Saharan AfricaQualitative ResearchQuantitative AnalysisMixed MethodsDemocratic TheoryConstitutional Law

References