Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Selective Accountability: Anti-Corruption Institutions and Political Weaponisation in African Hybrid Regimes
Abraham Kuol Nyuon
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19608152
Published: April 16, 2026
Abstract
Anti-corruption commissions in hybrid regimes are examined as institutions designed to signal accountability while preserving factional control over enforcement in Uganda, Kenya, and South Sudan. The study asks how selective accountability structures political order in the contemporary era of donor-backed anti-corruption institutionalism, combining insights from institutional economics, anti-corruption theory, and hybrid regime scholarship.
Drawing on comparative institutional analysis of anti-corruption bodies, prosecution record reviews, interviews with oversight actors, and process tracing of prominent cases, the analysis shows that the phenomenon is not best understood as a discrete policy failure or episodic crisis. Rather, it is reproduced through linked institutional and political mechanisms that reshape incentives, authority, and access to resources over time.
Across the cases, the study traces how these mechanisms operate in practice, the variation they generate, and why reform agendas that overlook underlying political settlements rarely succeed. It offers both a conceptual synthesis and a grounded comparative interpretation of selective accountability in hybrid regimes.
The study concludes that durable reform requires more than formal institutional design, demanding political bargaining and accountability strategies capable of reaching the effective sites of power.
Read the Full Article
The HTML galley is loaded below for inline reading and better discovery.
How to Cite
Abraham Kuol Nyuon (2026). Selective Accountability: Anti-Corruption Institutions and Political Weaponisation in African Hybrid Regimes. Pan African Journal of Political Science and Governance (Governance focus in, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19608152
Keywords
anti-corruptionhybrid regimesselective accountabilityUgandaKenyaSouth Sudaninstitutional design
Research Snapshot
Desktop reading viewLanguage
EN
Formats
HTML + PDF
Publication Track
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
Current Journal
Pan African Journal of Political Science and Governance (Governance focus in
References
- Fabrizio Barca; Philip McCann; Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose (2012). THE CASE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION: PLACE‐BASED VERSUS PLACE‐NEUTRAL APPROACHES*. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
- Gilbert. Seotsanyana (2001). Understanding project closures : objectives assessments vs. differing donor-recipient priorities : case study : Phuthiatsana Integrated Rural Development Project in Lesotho.. ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal). https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/5461
- Mark Tushnet (2013). Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press eBooks, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107252523.004
- Pollitt, Christopher (2016). Alina Mungiu-Pippidi (2015) The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(3), 617-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316658235
- Herbert A. Simon (1991). Organizations and Markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.25
- Chen-Ta Lin; Randall Mørck; Bernard Yeung; Xiaofeng Zhao (2016). What do we learn from stock price reactions to China’s first announcement of anti-corruption reforms?. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22001
- Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1999). Corruption and Government. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175098
- Alberto Vannucci (2015). Three paradigms for the analysis of corruption. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/5468
- Andreas G. F. Hoepner; Ioannis Oikonomou; Zacharias Sautner; Laura T. Starks; Xiao Y Zhou (2023). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. European Finance Review, 28(2), 483-510. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfad034
- Jonathan Fox; Jeffrey Hallock (2024). Open government and US development co‐operation in Colombia: Lessons for locally led development. Development Policy Review, 42(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12796
- Unknown Author (2004). Traditional and Modern Medicine in the Context of Globalization. https://doi.org/10.1596/10769
- Eric M. Uslaner (2006). Does Diversity Drive Down Trust?. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.903051